 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just uploaded an image with colored spheres in the p.b.i. newsgroup:
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.430ee1b94bbce914726bd13c0%40news.povray.org%3E/
I decided to render this one using POV-Ray 3.7 beta 8 to and I posted the
result in the same thread. I like the more vibrant looking colors, but see
a lot of artifacts and the soft shadow is even looking worse than in the
original.
I hope you developers can use this example to improve things again.
Best regards, NumbC
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NumbC wrote:
> I just uploaded an image with colored spheres in the p.b.i. newsgroup:
>
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.430ee1b94bbce914726bd13c0%40news.povray.org%3E/
>
> I decided to render this one using POV-Ray 3.7 beta 8 to and I posted the
> result in the same thread. I like the more vibrant looking colors, but see
> a lot of artifacts and the soft shadow is even looking worse than in the
> original.
In the future, please check the list of known bugs before reporting them again:
o There is an issue with media and transparency. See
<42769324$1@news.povray.org>.
o The windows editor does not always detect new files as type 'povray'.
o In many cases speed is not as good as 3.6.
o Photon support is not yet completed.
o There are some differences in the way gamma correction works.
Also, when reporting bugs, please follow the bug reporting guidelines as
outlined in the faq group.
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> Also, when reporting bugs, please follow the bug reporting guidelines as
> outlined in the faq group.
To avoid any confusion: This is about what information to include, not
_where_ to report a bug!
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> o There is an issue with media and transparency. See
> <42769324$1@news.povray.org>.
> o The windows editor does not always detect new files as type 'povray'.
> o In many cases speed is not as good as 3.6.
> o Photon support is not yet completed.
> o There are some differences in the way gamma correction works.
Sorry, a bit too enthusiastic I reckon playing around with the candy :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> In the future, please check the list of known bugs before reporting them again:
>
> o There is an issue with media and transparency. See
> <42769324$1@news.povray.org>.
> o The windows editor does not always detect new files as type 'povray'.
> o In many cases speed is not as good as 3.6.
> o Photon support is not yet completed.
> o There are some differences in the way gamma correction works.
Are the square & line artifacts in the image a result of these known issues?
That was my main concern, not the media and transparency or photon support.
BTW, here is the missing 'proper' bug information:
POV-Ray version: 3.7.0.beta.8.icl8.win32
OS version: Windows XP SP2 UK
PC: Intel P4 2.6Ghz, 2GB RAM
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
NumbC wrote:
> Are the square & line artifacts in the image a result of these known issues?
> That was my main concern, not the media and transparency or photon support.
>
> BTW, here is the missing 'proper' bug information:
> POV-Ray version: 3.7.0.beta.8.icl8.win32
> OS version: Windows XP SP2 UK
> PC: Intel P4 2.6Ghz, 2GB RAM
That is not the important information. Important would be a minimal scene.
But yes, what you report is known, so no need to supply any of that for
this report as it is a duplicate already :-)
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Are you using assumed_gamma? If so, that's causing the difference in
brightness.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
