POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.advanced-users : The Harcore Povrayer Test Server Time
30 Jul 2024 06:19:29 EDT (-0400)
  The Harcore Povrayer Test (Message 8 to 17 of 77)  
<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 13:57:00
Message: <3c59937c@news.povray.org>
In article <3c5977ae@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:

>   (My personal score is "only" 37, so it *is* a tough test.)

Mine is 36 - I really should _use_ POV-Ray more often...

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich
e-mail: mac### [at] povrayorg

I am a member of the POV-Ray Team.
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:02:34
Message: <3c5994ca@news.povray.org>
25.
But, uhm:
* You didn't know the answer to one of the above questions so you tried to find
it in the manual.

So you get a point for cheating?

cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x)               // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:09:31
Message: <slrna5j5jb.gn.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:02:27 +0100, Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> 25.
> But, uhm:
> * You didn't know the answer to one of the above questions so you tried to find
> it in the manual.
> 
> So you get a point for cheating?

Nope.  You get a point for trying to better yourself.  You don't get the
point for the question you had to look up the answer to.  Thus, the best
score you can get is 64.

-- 
plane{-z,-3normal{crackle scale.2#local a=5;#while(a)warp{repeat x flip x}rotate
z*60#local a=a-1;#end translate-9*x}pigment{rgb 1}}light_source{-9red 1rotate 60
*z}light_source{-9rgb y rotate-z*60}light_source{9-z*18rgb z}text{ttf"arial.ttf"
"RP".01,0translate-<.6,.4,.02>pigment{bozo}}light_source{-z*3rgb-.2}//Ron Parker


Post a reply to this message

From: ingo
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:55:54
Message: <Xns91A7D532EF6C9seed7@povray.org>
in news:3c5977ae@news.povray.org Warp wrote:

23,
...and they let me fool around with the docs....


Ingo


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 14:57:25
Message: <3c59a1a4@news.povray.org>
Zeger Knaepen <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote:
: * You didn't know the answer to one of the above questions so you tried to find
: it in the manual.

: So you get a point for cheating?

  The meaning of that is that you didn't know the answer to some question
and thus you didn't take a point in that question, but it interested you
so much that you tried to find the answer.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 15:00:49
Message: <3c59a271@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:
>   Some years ago I made a "Hardcore Povrayer Test" just for fun.

  Hmmm... only 21, and cheating a bit! Hardcore is not for me... I will 
better keep listening groove.

-- 
Jaime Vives Piqueres

La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Christoph Hormann
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 15:10:01
Message: <3C59A485.39D4EB53@gmx.de>
Warp wrote:
> 
>   Some years ago I made a "Hardcore Povrayer Test" just for fun. Here it is
> again, with small updates.
> 
>   For each statement which you feel is true in your case (be sincere), take
> one point. The number of points you get is your score. The maximum number
> of points is 65.
>   (My personal score is "only" 37, so it *is* a tough test.)

30, but with some questions i had doubts about the answer (and then
answered 'no').

A lot of questions are not very good, i picked out a few of them:

> * You never include the povray include libraries (like colors.inc) because
>   they slow parsing, but always define your colors, textures, etc by
>   yourself.

This is total crap of course, esp. with Povray 3.5

> * You only use the png format when working with povray.

Why does this qualify for a hardcore Pover?

> * You have made a modeller for povray.

Can you define 'modeller' please?

> * You know BOTH reasons why a mesh can't be used in CSG.

What is the second one?


I also have some suggestions:

* You have written isosurface functions by hand with more than X
characters (for 'X' use a reasonable value, for example 2000)

* You know the parameters of every internal function of Povray 3.5
(functions.inc) without looking it up. (that's a really hard one, maybe
just knowing every function is enough...)

* Your longest render was more than X days (X=5, 10, 20 or more)

-- 
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
IsoWood include, radiosity tutorial, TransSkin and other 
things on: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/


Post a reply to this message

From: Jan Walzer
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 15:12:39
Message: <3c59a537$1@news.povray.org>
25 ...

damn ...
maybe additional point for:

"you don't know .... but you know exactly where to find it in the docs ?"


--
#macro J(N A)#local a=mod(N 3);#local W=<int(mod(A,4)*2)int(-A/4)9>*2;#if
(!mod(a 2))sphere{W,2,2pigment{color rgb<a*5A/2W.x/A*5>}}#if(a<1)sphere{W
+<2,0>2 2pigment{color rgb<a*10A 10>}}#end#end#if(N>3)J(int(N/3)A+1)#end#
end blob{J(29229171 0)threshold 1translate<-6 3>}/******Jan Walzer******/


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 15:22:26
Message: <slrna5j9s3.in.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:09:41 +0100, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>> * You know BOTH reasons why a mesh can't be used in CSG.
> 
> What is the second one?

Oh, sure, we tell you and then you tell someone else and pretty soon
everyone has an extra hardcore point.

It's because (at least in 3.1) All_Mesh_Intersections doesn't actually
return all of the intersections; it just returns the closest one.

> * Your longest render was more than X days (X=5, 10, 20 or more)

I rendered the sample scenes on my old Amiga when I started using POV;
some of those took days to render.

-- 
#local R=<7084844682857967,0787982,826975826580>;#macro L(P)concat(#while(P)chr(
mod(P,100)),#local P=P/100;#end"")#end background{rgb 1}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.y)0,0
translate<-.8,0,-1>}text{ttf L(R.x)L(R.z)0,0translate<-1.6,-.75,-1>}sphere{z/9e3
4/26/2001finish{reflection 1}}//ron.parker@povray.org My opinions, nobody else's


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: The Harcore Povrayer Test
Date: 31 Jan 2002 16:06:19
Message: <3c59b1cb@news.povray.org>
In article <3C59A485.39D4EB53@gmx.de> , Christoph Hormann 
<chr### [at] gmxde>  wrote:

> * You have written isosurface functions by hand with more than X
> characters (for 'X' use a reasonable value, for example 2000)

Whatever size you pick up to the limit that functions allow, I have created
such a function ...  not that alternating sequences of x-x+y-y+z-z or similar
combinations make a lot of sense ;-)

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.