![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>
>> some sketches of mine:
>>
>> http://i38.tinypic.com/9sf4o2.jpg
>> http://i34.tinypic.com/rhtsur.gif
>> http://i35.tinypic.com/351z801.gif
>>
>> I'm yet to learn more painting technique to truly put the Gimp to
>> fire... but oh
>> man, love it!
>
> Some of us can't draw that well with a *real* pen. :-/
I love to draw ever since a child. In my youth, comics were my goal in
life... :D
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson escreveu:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>
>> even to the
>> point of making brush strokes and smearing the paint colors together
>> when you cross lines with different colors and such.
>
> Gimp will do that; I was playing around with mixing colours using the
> smudge tool, and that was pretty interesting.
But I believe he's talking about automatic smearing *while* stroking
with a paintbrush... like real paint strokes when on canvas. That'd be
cool to have in Gimp, but I'd more urgently wish more color-depth and
editable vector strokes.
Though now with a stylus vector strokes leading to smooth curves are
pretty low in my needs... :)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> I don't see the difference, except perhaps a more tiresome experience
> thanks no rest to the arm.
You can rest your arm. You just wind up cleaning the screen more often. :-)
It's handy because you can see just what you point at, like a touch screen
rather than a mouse, is all.
> the hand-eye coordination goes just smooth and natural, like as if
> directly drawing on paper...
That probably varies for different people.
The best game was Black & White, where your cursor is a grabby hand, and you
move around by grabbing the ground and dragging it towards you. *Very*
natural with a touch screen. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> But I believe he's talking about automatic smearing *while* stroking
> with a paintbrush...
Yes. The color sticks to your brush until you rinse the brush, in what's
said to be a very realistic way. (I.e., the point of *this* paint program is
to produce results as close to real paint as possible.)
Even then, if the water gets dirty, and you wash your brush, and then paint,
you leave watercolorish smears on the paper. You have to change the water to
get it clean again.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> I don't see the difference, except perhaps a more tiresome experience
>> thanks no rest to the arm.
>
> You can rest your arm. You just wind up cleaning the screen more often. :-)
>
> It's handy because you can see just what you point at
But there's a cursor showing exactly where you're pointing at. :)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> But I believe he's talking about automatic smearing *while* stroking
>> with a paintbrush...
>
> Yes. The color sticks to your brush until you rinse the brush, in what's
> said to be a very realistic way. (I.e., the point of *this* paint
> program is to produce results as close to real paint as possible.)
>
> Even then, if the water gets dirty, and you wash your brush, and then
> paint, you leave watercolorish smears on the paper. You have to change
> the water to get it clean again.
I see. Physically-based, unbiased painting, huh? ;)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:26:23 -0200, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson escreveu:
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>
>>> even to the
>>> point of making brush strokes and smearing the paint colors together
>>> when you cross lines with different colors and such.
>>
>> Gimp will do that; I was playing around with mixing colours using the
>> smudge tool, and that was pretty interesting.
>
> But I believe he's talking about automatic smearing *while* stroking
> with a paintbrush... like real paint strokes when on canvas. That'd be
> cool to have in Gimp, but I'd more urgently wish more color-depth and
> editable vector strokes.
Oh, yes, that would be nice. :-)
> Though now with a stylus vector strokes leading to smooth curves are
> pretty low in my needs... :)
It does make a big difference, doesn't it? I thought I could do fairly
well with a mouse, but there's absolutely no comparison.
The only thing is that it hasn't turned me into Da Vinci or Michaelangelo
yet. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:22:17 -0200, nemesis wrote:
> Jim Henderson escreveu:
>> Nice sketches - I wish I had that kind of talent.
>
> thanks, man!
>
>> Still, I'm finding
>> that my wrist hurts a *lot* less (I hardly notice it any more, in fact)
>> since I started using my Intuos4.
>
> It comes with a mouse too, but I'm loving the stylus alone! XD
Yeah, I do find myself using the mouse more and more - I use multiple
systems as a unified desktop, and while I could use relative positioning
with the pen, that's not as natural as using it with the mouse.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson escreveu:
> The only thing is that it hasn't turned me into Da Vinci or Michaelangelo
> yet. ;-)
Those guys had none of such babysitting techs around and yet provided
much richer art than most of today's art. Our buildings are geometric
and flat, our art abstract and noisy, our music all but drums, screams
and noise. Much better tools, much worse artists. Some say limitations
are an advantage for creativity and I tend to agree. A blank sheet
staring at me is an invitation to expression (as is a blinking cursor :).
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> I see. Physically-based, unbiased painting, huh? ;)
Quite a lot like that. I haven't painted enough to know how realistic it is,
but it sure *looks* more realistic than anything else i've found.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |