alphaQuad wrote:
> Some of the greatest supporting evidence for the theory of god, that is,
> intelligent design, and god defined as intelligence greater than ours, are the
> medicinal plants. Yah right, these plants could NOT have been designed they
> must have occurred randomly, NOT!
> 
Yeah, because they are so "perfect" that a) they change effectiveness 
based on when they are picked, how they are grown, the weather that 
year, how they are dried, how old they are when used, etc. and b) to 
make most of them "effective" we had to manufacture the active chemicals 
in a lab, give them odd names, then produce them in "known" dosages..

Ok, Mr. Confort, now tell us how the Banana is the "perfect food", and 
therefor a sign of intelligent design...

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message

Stephen wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2009 10:51:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>> Congratulations,
> 
> AQ season ;)

Wabbit season!

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Insanity is a small city on the western
   border of the State of Mind.

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:50:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 12 Jun 2009 10:51:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Congratulations,
> 
> AQ season ;)

Excuse me, I've just fallen out of my chair laughing. :-)

Duck season!

Jim

Post a reply to this message

alphaQuad wrote:
> Real Americans V. The Plague
> 
> When a REAL American sees a topic they don't agree with, they usually ignore it

> of view, I'll defend to my death your right to say it".

Or they do like what many non-Americans do:  Argue interminably without 
persuading the other side.

> The plague of mankind will try to silence someone when his or her meager
> intellect is threatened by a new idea. Like the Jews wanted Jesus silenced,
> like Warp and Jim Henderson want me silenced.

They want you to stop blathering; that's not the same as wanting you 
silenced.

And don't compare yourself to Jesus.  That gets you even less sympathy 
from Christians than it will from non-Christians.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message

Tis the season of your poisoning, but seemingly most of you are of the average
brain density making you completely clueless and ignorant of the horrifying
reality.

At the risk of a gross generalization, god you people are stupid, proving that
water fluoridation is working at keeping you that way.

And I CAN compare myself to Jesus in more than one way, if you cant see it, that
is your severe IQ limitation, not mine. And its just a story and no one knew him
but the religious sheep will fight to the death defending their personal
relationship with him. Thats just too brainwashed. If only you could think for
yourself.

http://www.just-think-it.com/f-facts.htm

Its just good I don't have to speak in public like Jesus did and that I don't
throw temper tantrums in the temple like he did.

No wonder no help is coming, obviously too few on earth are worth the trouble.
What a bunch of twits. And if the shoe doesn't fit, the statements herein are
about the other guy and won't bother you. MOST of you definitely have the same
shoe size and they don't make hats small enough to fit your pointy heads. LOL



The link is way more than I need to see how obvious all of this is. Virtually
none of you are guilty of independent thought.

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:18:26 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> On 12 Jun 2009 10:51:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>> Congratulations,
>> 
>> AQ season ;)
>
>Wabbit season!

North Korea season ;-)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 12 Jun 2009 20:30:56 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:50:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12 Jun 2009 10:51:13 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Congratulations,
>> 
>> AQ season ;)
>
>Excuse me, I've just fallen out of my chair laughing. :-)
>

<Takes a bow>

>Duck season!
>
Anything but Fluoride season.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> alphaQuad wrote:
>
> > If wasn't a molecule it would not exist, a compound (molecule) containing a
> > fluorine atom is a still a molecule, an ion is a charge. So there should be an
> > ionic attraction method to remove the MOLECULE, now that you mention it
>
> There are many fluoride compounds (compounds that contain the fluoride
> ion) Can you be more specific? Do you mean sodium fluoride, magnesium
> fluoride, cesium fluoride? or maybe cobalt fluoride perhaps? iron
> fluoride? hydrogen fluoride? or maybe you mean potassium fluoride?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride
>
> Once you reveal which /compound/ you're blathering about *then* we can
> talk about toxicity.
>
> --
> ~Mike

It is difficult to pin down because it is manufacturing waste in many forms
being sold to cities for disposal, rather than spending the money it would take
to properly dispose.

Again it is not me blathering, because it is ALL toxic and blathering about the
difference is just an attempt to be "non-alarmist", or is it a profit motive?

NaF is apparently 50 times more toxic than that of NaF2.

I still await your catch-up.

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:42:28 -0500, Shay wrote:
>
> > alphaQuad wrote:
> >> not even worthy of a reply, now your just nitpicking
> >>
> >>
> > you're
>
> Heh, yeah, he got that wrong in the other thread as well.  But the other
> way around ("you're" where he meant "your").
>
> Jim

My Dear John Dense Rim, (note I use ALL the letters of his name)

You really have few clues running around in you're cob webs.


When I first saw shay's "you're" I wanted to say no sh|t shay, but no one would
have gotten that, and it would have seemed derogatory, so I opted for the
"person of few words" feigning ignorance. Skipped right off you're knoggin.

I once ran across a wed site devoted the difference between your and you're. The
guy was claiming his amazement at the people "who don't understand" the
difference between the two. So I wrote him explaining that the common
occurrence just happens even tho they do in fact understand it.

When I type, MY thoughts are into the next the paragraph while fingers TRY to
keep up. And the common mistake does happen often, this time I do it
intentionally just to make a humorous, albeit annoying, point. My thoughts are
EM based and at the speed of light while you'res just skip off the pond.


It just shows that you have lots of time at you're slow thought pace to sweat
the little stuff. And of course you're only purpose is to find fault, again
showing you're limited and slow thought pattern and the lack of intelligence to
focus on the important stuff that is so far beyond you're comprehension.

I should devote a whole web site to the brain density of the average human.

And of course you're only purpose is to find fault in an attempt to cause some
emotional expense to me(showing of what your made), if that were even possible,
but you have not gotten that clue either.

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

> > Jim


Oh and "Jim", All my love to you in an attempt fill your void. I am working on a
solution to your condition.

Post a reply to this message