![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1650
Why does this never happen to me?
Oh, wait... MAYBE IT DOES!! O_O
Oh my god...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4bd15a8e$1@news.povray.org...
> http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1650
>
> Why does this never happen to me?
Totally unrealistic picture. Guy is too slim.
In my experience, the girth of a person is directly proportional to the
number of books he reads. You can either spend your spare time on reading or
exercise, but both at the same time does not really work out.
Not really advisable, too, if you are trying to read and drive a bike at the
same time, or if you are reading while jogging - those pesky lampposts
simply have no consideration at all and tend to get in your way. Trees won't
make way for you, either. Probably because what you are reading is printed
on a close relative...
Then, the number of young women being attracted to you is inversely
proportional to your girth. ;-)
So: completely unrealistic situation. Abandon all hope.
But it is probably all for the best, anyway, since women are the root of all
evil.
Can be scientifically proven: look here ;-)
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/off-topic-forum/109078-women-root-all-evil.html
Well, I must have eaten a clown for breakfast, today...
http://www.bitfreak.net/bitlog/pivot/entry.php?id=297
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
TC wrote:
> Well, I must have eaten a clown for breakfast, today...
This morning my wife asked what I was making, I said "A peanut butter jelly
sandwich." She said "I didn't know we had any jellyfish left." I had to
start over.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Linux: Now bringing the quality and usability of
open source desktop apps to your personal electronics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/04/2010 5:15 PM, Darren New wrote:
> TC wrote:
>> Well, I must have eaten a clown for breakfast, today...
>
> This morning my wife asked what I was making, I said "A peanut butter
> jelly sandwich." She said "I didn't know we had any jellyfish left." I
> had to start over.
>
I can understand her concern ;-)
That is one of the most disgusting sounding foods ever. OK I know that
what you call jelly is what we Brits call jam and our jelly is your
Jell-O but it still conjures up evil thoughts to me. My wife likes
peanut butter and jam but I prefer good old fashioned stir fried jellyfish.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen wrote:
> My wife likes
> peanut butter and jam but I prefer good old fashioned stir fried jellyfish.
I like them both. But they just don't go together.
FWIW, Americans have both jelly *and* jam. Jam is jelly with bits of fruit
in it. Sort of like the difference between chunky and smooth peanut butter.
So yeah, "jelly" technically *is* "Jell-O", which here is a brand of
gelatin. Jelly is just jell-o with a slightly different consistency and
flavoring.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Linux: Now bringing the quality and usability of
open source desktop apps to your personal electronics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:42:28 +0200, Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> So yeah, "jelly" technically *is* "Jell-O", which here is a brand of
> gelatin.
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/4/7/
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/04/2010 5:42 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> My wife likes peanut butter and jam but I prefer good old fashioned
>> stir fried jellyfish.
>
> I like them both. But they just don't go together.
>
No they don’t :-)
> FWIW, Americans have both jelly *and* jam. Jam is jelly with bits of
> fruit in it. Sort of like the difference between chunky and smooth
> peanut butter. So yeah, "jelly" technically *is* "Jell-O", which here is
> a brand of gelatin. Jelly is just jell-o with a slightly different
> consistency and flavoring.
>
Thanks and to confuse things further (for the English, Brits), in my
home town of Glasgow we called cheep jam (with very few bits of fruit)
jeely. As in a jeely piece or a jam sandwich. Made famous in the jeely
Piece song. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A7SAPmcwXA
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:23:18 +0200, TC wrote:
> You can either spend your spare time on reading or exercise, but both at
> the same time does not really work out.
I often see people at the gym working out (doing cardio) and reading at
the same time.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Why does this never happen to me?
>
> Totally unrealistic picture. Guy is too slim.
>
> In my experience, the girth of a person is directly proportional to the
> number of books he reads. You can either spend your spare time on reading or
> exercise, but both at the same time does not really work out.
False.
For almost my entire adult life, I spent a huge proportion of my time
sitting motionless in front of a computer (sometimes to the point that
my legs actually went numb) and eating nothing but high-calorie junk
food, and yet maintained a skinny physique.
Some people are just like that.
> Then, the number of young women being attracted to you is inversely
> proportional to your girth. ;-)
This, however, is true...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> For almost my entire adult life, I spent a huge proportion of my time
> sitting motionless in front of a computer (sometimes to the point that
> my legs actually went numb) and eating nothing but high-calorie junk
> food, and yet maintained a skinny physique.
>
> Some people are just like that.
I think most people were like that at some point earlier in their life :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |