 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> The fact is that I don't care anymore. Let Disney rewrite history and
> Bird cite his own family inspirations for a plot that resembles so much
> that of a mature comic book classic...
Sounds like *your* motivation is to call Bird a liar, not to publish facts.
If you really want to know, I didn't find any similarities between Watchmen
and Incredibles. Now that you point it out, sure, there are some
similarities, primarily the "superheros are disliked and outlawed." But that
happens in a number of movies. Batman and Hancock and Star Trek and the
Bible spring to mind.
Mysterious island is a kind of obvious place to put out-of-the-way evil for
land-dwelling species. Citation: at least three or four Bond movies, for
example, as well as King Kong.
Villain lies to people about danger in order to be a hero. "Mission
Accomplished!" Except in Watchmen he didn't lie in order to be a hero. The
whole plot device wouldn't have worked if the villain was taken to be a hero
because of what he did. In Watchmen he makes a truly dangerous thing in
order to save the world without taking credit, while in Incredibles he makes
a supposedly harmless thing in order to take the credit for defeating it.
That the evil device was also based on a squid isn't really surprising
either. Gee, think Watchmen took the idea from Jules Verne?
If you're going to compare two plots, you have to compare all the major
points, not just the ones that match.
Watchmen: there's a hunt for the bad guy. Incredibles: there isn't.
Watchmen: they're normal people. Incredibles: they aren't.
Watchmen: lots of internal moral conflict. Incredibles: little to none.
Watchmen: Rape. Incredibles: No rape.
Watchmen: Prison break. Incredibles: No prison break.
Watchmen: Cancer. Incredibles: No cancer.
Watchmen: Mars. Incredibles: No mars.
Watchmen: Thermonuclear annihilation. Incredibles: No nuclear bombs.
Watchmen: Bad guy gets away with it. Incredibles: Bad guy gets caught.
Watchmen: No babies kidnapped. Incredibles: Babies kidnapped.
Watchmen: Good guy main character has secret high tech.
Incredibles: Bad guy main character has secret high tech.
Watchmen: Disfunctional families. Incredibles: Happily married families.
Watchmen: Good guy main character is insane psychopathic killer.
Incredibles: No insane psychopathic killers.
Watchmen: Bad guy motivated by love for humanity.
Incredibles: Bad guy motivated by hubris and vengeance.
Watchmen: Good guy motivated by fear.
Incredibles: Good guy motivated by boredom.
To me, they seem like completely different movies, with different moods,
morals, plots, motivations, and environments. I wouldn't have a problem
believing that Incredibles wasn't particularly inspired by Watchmen. It's
certainly not a retelling of the story in any sense.
I bet with enough work you could say that the Matrix has as many
similarities to Incredibles as Watchmen does.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
> > The fact is that I don't care anymore. Let Disney rewrite history and
> > Bird cite his own family inspirations for a plot that resembles so much
> > that of a mature comic book classic...
>
> Sounds like *your* motivation is to call Bird a liar, not to publish facts.
My motivation was to point out the similarities. Perhaps I went to far by going
for "inspiration" rather than just plainly pointing them out. This thread
however got to my nerves and I discounted on Bird. though he deserves...
> Now that you point it out, sure, there are some
> similarities, primarily the "superheros are disliked and outlawed." But that
> happens in a number of movies. Batman and Hancock and Star Trek
There was no plot like that before Watchmen. None at all. A critic hailed it
as Alan Moore's obituary for the whole super-hero concept.
> Mysterious island is a kind of obvious place to put out-of-the-way evil for
> land-dwelling species. Citation: at least three or four Bond movies, for
> example, as well as King Kong.
Yes, Bond is a reference in both The Incredibles and Watchmen. Watchmen's
Adrian Veidt was a caped crusader until retiring and becoming a wealthy
businessman. His early-Bond villain attire is noted, like his lynx pet and
enjoyment of ancient civilizations. Very Dr. No.
> The
> whole plot device wouldn't have worked if the villain was taken to be a hero
> because of what he did. In Watchmen he makes a truly dangerous thing in
> order to save the world without taking credit, while in Incredibles he makes
> a supposedly harmless thing in order to take the credit for defeating it.
I didn't say it was straight similar. I said both did it to feel heroic about
the act of saving the world. Feeling heroic about it doesn't require publicity
about it.
That's not the only plot twist The Incredibles got to get a plot similar yet
different: they also had, as you note below, real super-beings rather than the
strong, but humanized masked crime fighters. I also mentioned that the only
super-being in Watchmen doesn't care about mankind.
> That the evil device was also based on a squid isn't really surprising
> either. Gee, think Watchmen took the idea from Jules Verne?
Yes, but the point is: why The Incredibles had copy-cat all these same choices
of staple fantasy/scifi literature as Watchmen?
> If you're going to compare two plots, you have to compare all the major
> points, not just the ones that match.
> Watchmen: there's a hunt for the bad guy. Incredibles: there isn't.
Come again?
> Watchmen: they're normal people. Incredibles: they aren't.
Most obvious deviating plot. Watchmen set out to be a "realistic" super hero
comic book. No such need in an animation.
> Watchmen: lots of internal moral conflict. Incredibles: little to none.
> Watchmen: Rape. Incredibles: No rape.
Family movie.
> Watchmen: Prison break. Incredibles: No prison break.
Sure there's a prison break in Incredibles.
> Watchmen: Cancer. Incredibles: No cancer.
What about that mutating kid? Sure does not sound healthy in the long term...
:P
> Watchmen: Mars. Incredibles: No mars.
Mars is up there. ;)
> Watchmen: Thermonuclear annihilation. Incredibles: No nuclear bombs.
No bombs detonated in Watchmen, thanks to Veidt's intervention. One bomb
detonated by Bomb Voyage in Incredibles.
> Watchmen: Bad guy gets away with it. Incredibles: Bad guy gets caught.
Rorschach's journal is sent to a right-wing publication prior to going to
Ozymandias fortress. Not seen, but "bad guy" is caught in the act indeed.
> Watchmen: No babies kidnapped. Incredibles: Babies kidnapped.
Worse: children murdered.
> Watchmen: Good guy main character has secret high tech.
> Incredibles: Bad guy main character has secret high tech.
"Bad guy" too.
> Watchmen: Disfunctional families. Incredibles: Happily married families.
Sure. It's a family movie.
> Watchmen: Good guy main character is insane psychopathic killer.
> Incredibles: No insane psychopathic killers.
Prior to trying with Mr. Incredible, Syndrome had killed several past heroes
while bettering Omnidroid. That's pretty psychopathic to me.
> Watchmen: Bad guy motivated by love for humanity.
> Incredibles: Bad guy motivated by hubris and vengeance.
> Watchmen: Good guy motivated by fear.
> Incredibles: Good guy motivated by boredom.
I never said The Incredibles to be as deep as Watchmen. It's the opposite, a
light, family-geared, comic rather than realist take on the very same themes of
Watchmen. You just listed all the contrasting choices Pixar opted to uncover
the Watchmen main plot. They also mixed enough James Bond and Fantastic Four
and diverged a lot in the original plot to dismiss any further relations.
There's no bad guy in Watchmen, just human beings and dubious moral choices.
Ozymandias may not have been motivated solely by a love for humanity or the
desire to see a unified Earth: like all the other characters, other motives of
sexual or egomaniac nature may drive him. He resented The Comedian waking him
up to the uselessness of puerile heroism. Still, he sets as his main goal
through years to come to do exactly what Captain Metropolis says in that same
episode: "Who's going to save Earth?" He was still fantasizing of being a
hero, despite the seriousness and larger scale of the plan.
> To me, they seem like completely different movies,
Watchmen is not a movie. The movie based on Watchmen sucks like any Hollywood
shallow and puerile take on a serious subject matter. It sucks a bit less than
Hancock. There are none of the multilayered meanings, self-referencing forms,
crucial side-stories, homages to old comic books, or human emotion from the
book.
The finale is also very different from the comic book and the long fight with a
villainous Ozymandias completely unnecessary and dork. He has no super-powers
as the movie pictures it. It also completely ruined him as he's seen as a
flat, villainesque hero in bad rubber Batman suit and having The Flash speed...
> with different moods,
> morals, plots, motivations, and environments. I wouldn't have a problem
> believing that Incredibles wasn't particularly inspired by Watchmen. It's
> certainly not a retelling of the story in any sense.
Let's tell a very brief plot, shall we?
In the past, super-heroes were abound. Until the day their popularity fades
among the public and they are ruled out by a government act. A few years
later, some of them are living normal lifes, some of them still in undercover
activities. One of them still in activity discovers a malign plan hiding on an
Island and is killed. One of his old hero fellows begin investigating and is
led to believe there's a conspiracy to kill super heroes. He's caught and is
tortured. Some of his fellows go on to infiltrate and release him. They then
realize the plan of the villain to be a hero by faking an alien attack with a
huge monocular, tentacled monster.
The Incredibles or Watchmen? your choice...
> I bet with enough work you could say that the Matrix has as many
> similarities to Incredibles as Watchmen does.
I'll leave you to try your hand at those.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
*deadpan* I think you're taking this whole thing far too seriously.
Especially over a comic book, which everyone knows is for small
children. The imagery is crude and lacking artistic merit, especially
in the works of Alan Moore.
*runs away as fast as possible*
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I know and care less than nothing about either the Incredibles or
>> Watchmen, but my 2 cents says the text above reads very much like an
>> argument, not as an encyclopedic entry. Maybe that's the contention.
>> It's not an encyclopedia's job to make a point (and no, some bad
>> examples from Wikipedia don't change this rule) but to document well
>> established points. If you have a reference, only a single sentence
>> should suffice.
>
> Well stated - we've found something to agree on. :-)
>
> Jim
I'm sure enough people have noticed the similarity to find
citations via Google.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/bal-to.sragow13mar13,0,3736906.story
etc.
Still, it probably belongs in the critics section...
There's no telling what Brad Bird thought, or when he thought it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_subconscious
Comics often get pretty close to archetypes, that's just how it is.
It'd be more surprising if the monsters didn't have tentacles =P
Still, I've heard enough stories about writers having their
stories stolen by producers in Hollywood to think that
probably is what happened with The Incredibles.
DC comics or the original writers probably had grounds
for a lawsuit, but that would have soured their relationship
with Hollywood for other projects, like the Watchmen film.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> A more direct inspiration
Citation needed. How do you know it's an inspiration?
> is the comic book masterpiece
"masterpeice": opinion. "Original research."
> The main differences being that Watchmen's "villain" truly turns out to
> save the world by way of his machiavelic plan and that no hero is truly
> super: the only one with true superpower couldn't care less for mankind or
> living organisms
Interpretation of the plot: original research. Implication of relevance to
The Incredibles is also original research.
> Even the "no cape" is from Watchmen
Why say "even" unless you're trying to prove a point? Encyclopedias don't
try to prove points; they state facts.
In addition there are a few sentences with poor structure or vague
relevance. "is going on", "not in the watchmen movie though", and the "The
Omnidroid" sentence.
Although you have some interesting points which would be good for different
forums, the moderators were correct to remove this information as it was
implying conclusions that could not be verified by external sources.
Also, I'm drunk. =D
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Publish a paper on it on your website.
Then, in Wikipedia, reference that paper.
That should satisfy the "no original research" policy just fine.
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/15/2009 2:30 PM, nemesis wrote:
> I gave wikipedia's own Watchmen entry. Yeah, not respectable at all.
Actually, it isn't.
Wikipedia has huge credibility issues. With all the blatant lying,
fanaticism, and laziness on the part of its contributors, a great deal
of the content on it is just plain inaccurate. Several of my professors
have repeatedly stated that referencing Wikipedia in any way in a paper
will result in an instant fail grade for that paper.
As such, Wikipedia wants to improve their image, and one of their
requirements is that all claims be backed up with legitimate, outside
references.
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/15/2009 7:07 PM, nemesis wrote:
> How could he not be aware of this classic? You know Alan Moore was
> featured in a Simpsons episode? You know Brad Bird was creative
> consultant to the Simpsons? No, I don't know if the episode is from
> before or after he left, what I do know is:
Maybe you should put a disclaimer in, stating that "the striking
similarity between the two plots has lead some to speculate that Brad
Bird was inspired by the classic graphic novel, Watchmen. This,
however, remains unconfirmed."
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/15/2009 7:12 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Star Wars, The Belgariad, and Dune, and Magician:Apprentice (and its
> sequels) all have a common plot - the world is in trouble and then saved
> by a messiah character. That doesn't mean they were inspired by the
> Bible (or that any of their authors read the Bible or were even inspired
> by it).
Actually, I saw an interview with George Lucas once where he pretty much
stated that Star Wars was inspired by the Bible. His whole point in
making it was, "What if Jesus turned bad?" Of course, it took him more
than 20 years to really finish the whole story, but that's beside the
point...
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> *deadpan* I think you're taking this whole thing far too seriously.
> Especially over a comic book, which everyone knows is for small
> children. The imagery is crude and lacking artistic merit, especially
> in the works of Alan Moore.
>
> *runs away as fast as possible*
*throws a granade*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
