![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> - 1U rack-mount form factor. (It's bloody heavy BTW.)
>
> No, it's not. DL380G5 on 2U in size.
Really? It seems to be the same size as all the other 1U equipment.
(Unless I got the model number wrong or something...)
>> - When mine arrived, I had to open it up and install the optional extras
>> myself. In particular, it is highly non-obvious how to remove the air
>> baffle. (And I don't want to break a £4,000 server in five minutes!) I
>> had to install the second CPU and the second pair of RAM boards.
>
> You grab a hold on the baffle and take it out upwards. Yes, you'll need
> to sort out the SAS cables and possibly RAID-controllers battery, but
> it's no big deal.
It's more that it seems to be fixed in place, and you seem to need a
surprising amount of force to get it to move.
OTOH, putting it *back* was way harder...
> Yes, the installation tool sucks. I've always removed the processor from
> it and installed the proc by hand.
Heh. Damned thing...
>> WHAT THE HELL MORE DO YOU WANT?!?!! >_<
>
> Free tea? :)
LOL! That's about all that's missing...
>> ...although, having just said all that, the cable arm isn't as nice as
>> the Dell one. It's a bit flimsy, and bends in planes it shouldn't.
>
> Is it attached properly? It is flimsy if it's attached poorly, but
> pretty good when properly in place.
Well, there's a little catch that's supposed to make the arm stop and
retain it in place. But it's so flimsy the arm easily rides over the top
of it. :-/
(The fun part was that you can "invert" the arm, so it doesn't look like
in the drawings. Took ages to figure that one out - especially as the
springs hold it in a position that looks different to the manual.)
>> Also,
>> the automated installer doesn't support Windows 2000 Server, which is
>> what the company IT department wanted me to use. Wasted a few hours on
>> that one. But that's about all I can actually find to complain about.
>
> Try 7-series Smartstart:
We tried an older version, but it didn't like our Windows CD. (The CD
contains Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, and Windows
2000 Professional on the same CD. It seemed to not like that.)
>> PS. What *the hell* is a "PPM"? And why is it 80% heatsink??
>
> Processor Power Module. It regulates the power for the processor (that's
> why it's 80% heatsink).
Um... OK. That's pretty weird tho.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> - 1U rack-mount form factor. (It's bloody heavy BTW.)
>>
>> No, it's not. DL380G5 on 2U in size.
>
> Really? It seems to be the same size as all the other 1U equipment.
> (Unless I got the model number wrong or something...)
Really :). I've installed 6 DL380G5's and 1 DL385G2 (which is pretty
common to DL380G5, just with AMD technology) within 2 weeks. There
usually are little triangles at racks, 2U has two of them and six square
holes within its size.
> It's more that it seems to be fixed in place, and you seem to need a
> surprising amount of force to get it to move.
Well yes, it's a bit tricky at first, but not *that* hard.
> OTOH, putting it *back* was way harder...
True :). But when you find the way, it just click to its place.
> Well, there's a little catch that's supposed to make the arm stop and
> retain it in place. But it's so flimsy the arm easily rides over the top
> of it. :-/
True.
> (The fun part was that you can "invert" the arm, so it doesn't look like
> in the drawings. Took ages to figure that one out - especially as the
> springs hold it in a position that looks different to the manual.)
True, it's a bit tricky at first (am I repeating myself?), but when you
get it sorted out, it's ok.
> We tried an older version, but it didn't like our Windows CD. (The CD
> contains Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, and Windows
> 2000 Professional on the same CD. It seemed to not like that.)
Ah yes, I think it needs the "real" CD at hand (or an ISO image, for
that matter).
>>> PS. What *the hell* is a "PPM"? And why is it 80% heatsink??
>>
>> Processor Power Module. It regulates the power for the processor (that's
>> why it's 80% heatsink).
>
> Um... OK. That's pretty weird tho.
>
Why? That way it's replaceable, if it should ever break down.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>>>> - 1U rack-mount form factor. (It's bloody heavy BTW.)
>>> No, it's not. DL380G5 on 2U in size.
>> Really? It seems to be the same size as all the other 1U equipment.
>> (Unless I got the model number wrong or something...)
>
> Really :). I've installed 6 DL380G5's and 1 DL385G2 (which is pretty
> common to DL380G5, just with AMD technology) within 2 weeks. There
> usually are little triangles at racks, 2U has two of them and six square
> holes within its size.
Hmm, OK. Maybe I was wrong then... :-S
>> It's more that it seems to be fixed in place, and you seem to need a
>> surprising amount of force to get it to move.
>
> Well yes, it's a bit tricky at first, but not *that* hard.
>
>> OTOH, putting it *back* was way harder...
>
> True :). But when you find the way, it just click to its place.
More like, it makes a loud *snap* - as in "OMG, I think I broke it!"
...or, maybe I *did* break it?? o_O
>> Well, there's a little catch that's supposed to make the arm stop and
>> retain it in place. But it's so flimsy the arm easily rides over the top
>> of it. :-/
>
> True.
The Dell arm has a bracket that's the full height of the arm. No way
it's going to ride over that. It also has sprung-loaded folding clips to
hold the cables, rather than (non-reusable) cable straps like HP supply.
>> (The fun part was that you can "invert" the arm, so it doesn't look like
>> in the drawings. Took ages to figure that one out - especially as the
>> springs hold it in a position that looks different to the manual.)
>
> True, it's a bit tricky at first (am I repeating myself?), but when you
> get it sorted out, it's ok.
Heh. I just love the way I spent ages strapping down all the cables, and
*then* noticed the power cable anchors in the box... ;-)
>>>> PS. What *the hell* is a "PPM"? And why is it 80% heatsink??
>>> Processor Power Module. It regulates the power for the processor (that's
>>> why it's 80% heatsink).
>> Um... OK. That's pretty weird tho.
>
> Why? That way it's replaceable, if it should ever break down.
Yeah, but... why do you need to regulate this at all? Why does it need
to be a seperate device? And why does it get so hot?? (Also, why do no
other computers have these?)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Which is great if you just want something to happen when the
> user presses a button, but becomes problematic if you want things to
> happen while the user isn't pressing anything. (E.g., if you wanted to
> do something compute-bound, now the GUI stops responding until the
> compute task finishes.)
That's why the computer gods invented threads.
Seriously, it's the only sane way to do something compute-bound AND have a
GUI.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> Hmm, OK. Maybe I was wrong then... :-S
Apparently yes, but don't worry about being wrong, just learn more :).
> More like, it makes a loud *snap* - as in "OMG, I think I broke it!"
>
> ...or, maybe I *did* break it?? o_O
I don't think so. So far I haven't found a single way to break it
without intention to do so.
> The Dell arm has a bracket that's the full height of the arm. No way
> it's going to ride over that.
So did earlier HP's (4U ones), but it's easier to fit on the cables when
you can turn the arm backwards.
> It also has sprung-loaded folding clips to
> hold the cables, rather than (non-reusable) cable straps like HP supply.
That's a real fail with HP :/. We're using reusable Velcro-tape on that.
> Heh. I just love the way I spent ages strapping down all the cables, and
> *then* noticed the power cable anchors in the box... ;-)
:)
> Yeah, but... why do you need to regulate this at all?
Because the PSU won't provide the exactly correct voltage?
> Why does it need
> to be a seperate device? And why does it get so hot?? (Also, why do no
> other computers have these?)
They do, but on your desktop computer it's welded on the mobo, along
with other parts there, so you won't notice it as easily. And it doesn't
usually get so hot, but they (AND you) want to be sure to be sure it has
enough cooling area (even in extreme circumstances with 2-3 fans failed)
- that's why it's so big and heavy.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Saul Luizaga wrote:
> BTW guys have you read/heard news about the 5TB/sqr. inch HP tape
> back-up? I hope it could be in production so it arrives to my country in
> about 6 months-1 year aprox., but again the price... probably is about
> 1000 $us... :(
Sorry, that was IBM...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Mine is configured like this:
>
> - Dual redundant PSUs.
> - 2x quad-core Xeons at 2.0 GHz. (Yes, you read correctly. That's 8
> cores in total.)
> - 4x 1 GB RAM (i.e., 4 GB RAM on two channels.)
> - 6x SAS 72 GB HDs spinning at 10,000 RPM. (Configured as two RAID-1
> arrays with one hot spare and one cold spare.)
...OK, so I just got an Insight UK catelogue land on my desk. And what
does it have splashed across the front page?
THE WORLD'S BEST SELLING SERVER
ENTERPRISE-CLASS RACK SERVER
HP PROLIANT DL380 G5
1x 2.5 GHz Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420
2 GB memory expandable to 32 GB
Hot swap 2.5" bays
ASK FOR: HPIA0432B
other hand... well, you compare the specs. It looks like HDs are about
delivery, so they possibly charged us more for that.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
...and now I'm going to waste an afternoon looking at expensive server
hardware! :-D
Check this out:
http://uk.insight.com/apps/productpresentation/index.php?product_id=HPIA04379C
That's a nice piece of hardware, but pretty expensive. And what does the
enclosure cost??
Oh, "free enclosure"? *clicks* Ah, right. If you buy 8 blades, the
enclosure is free. Um, yeah. Tad expensive! :-P
Ah, here we go:
http://uk.insight.com/apps/productpresentation/index.php?product_id=HPOA03V0H
Look at that. A thousand pounds for an empty metal box. Heh. But hey,
this one is even better:
http://uk.insight.com/apps/productpresentation/index.php?product_id=HP40332100
Gotta love the way Insight can't manage to list the enclosure on the
page about the blade, or the blade on the page about the enclosure. :-P
Yeah, great website guys.
Still, realistically... if I just want something with silly amounts of
CPU power, there are cheaper ways to do that than a server. I just like
the way servers look cool, that's all. Way cooler than the "extreme
modded" gamer PCs! :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 3/3/2009 8:01 AM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Dangit! Now I have a the urge to write a C# version. I did the Towers of
> hanoi problem (with a solver) in C#, that entertained me for a while.
Did the world end when it finished? :0
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 3/3/2009 7:59 AM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> Then I changed it so it played itself.
And it realized the futility of war :)
--
...Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |