 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:16:46 +0100, Stephen <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com>
did spake, saying:
> "scott" <sco### [at] scott com> wrote:
>
>> When you get a packet or tin of something that says pull/tear here, only
>> it's physically impossible to actually pull/tear without making a huge
>> mess.
>
> Always have a sharp knife to hand (No Glasgow jokes please, Andrew)
> I always carry a small but sharp penknife for opening things.
Aren't those classed as offensive weapons now; I heard Glasgow jokes were
one of the biggest causes of death in some parts of Scotland?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:19:14 +0100, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>Aren't those classed as offensive weapons now; I heard Glasgow jokes were
>one of the biggest causes of death in some parts of Scotland?
inches long. It also has a nail file and a tiny pair of scissors so I could give
you a pretty vicious manicure. The knife blade is always kept sharp enough to
cut paper.
As for the Glasgow jokes, received wisdom says it's classed as suicide ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:19:14 +0100, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>>
>>Aren't those classed as offensive weapons now; I heard Glasgow jokes were
>>one of the biggest causes of death in some parts of Scotland?
>
> I don't know the current regulations/laws but the blade on mine is only 1
> ¼ inches long. It also has a nail file and a tiny pair of scissors so I
> could give you a pretty vicious manicure. The knife blade is always kept
> sharp enough to cut paper.
I think Phil said the *jokes* are offensive weapons :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:22:41 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>
>I think Phil said the *jokes* are offensive weapons :)
He might have but who can tell with a Brum accent? :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:22:41 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
> wrote:
>
>> I think Phil said the *jokes* are offensive weapons :)
>
> He might have but who can tell with a Brum accent? :)
Sorry, could you repeat that a bit more slowly. Did you say it in Gaelic?
John (speaking RP)
--
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:41:00 +0100, Doctor John <joh### [at] homecom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:22:41 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think Phil said the *jokes* are offensive weapons :)
>>
>> He might have but who can tell with a Brum accent? :)
>Sorry, could you repeat that a bit more slowly. Did you say it in Gaelic?
>
>John (speaking RP)
Seeyoujimmie, doesyermithersew?
Weel giter tay sew this ya bammpot!
:)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> Seeyoujimmie, doesyermithersew?
> Weel giter tay sew this ya bammpot!
>
> :)
omg, violence on p.o-t :-)
John
--
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:45:42 +0100, Doctor John <joh### [at] homecom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>>
>> Seeyoujimmie, doesyermithersew?
>> Weel giter tay sew this ya bammpot!
>>
>> :)
>
>omg, violence on p.o-t :-)
>
>John
No a sign of affection :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:36:39 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
did spake, saying:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:19:14 +0100, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Aren't those classed as offensive weapons now; I heard Glasgow jokes
>> were
>> one of the biggest causes of death in some parts of Scotland?
>
> I don't know the current regulations/laws but the blade on mine is only
> 1 ¼ inches long. It also has a nail file and a tiny pair of scissors so
> I could give you a pretty vicious manicure. The knife blade is always
> kept sharp enough to cut paper.
Anything with a blade or a point except a folding knife unless it has an
edge over 3 inches in length. That said you can get away with it if it's
for either a) work, b) education, c) religion, or d) national costume;
note that e) hobby doesn't appear so extreme whittlers can be locked up
for the safety of us all.
> As for the Glasgow jokes, received wisdom says it's classed as suicide ;)
Nicolas managed to decipher my thick Brummie accent correctly.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:22:52 +0100, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>Anything with a blade or a point except a folding knife unless it has an
>edge over 3 inches in length. That said you can get away with it if it's
>for either a) work, b) education, c) religion, or d) national costume;
>note that e) hobby doesn't appear so extreme whittlers can be locked up
>for the safety of us all.
>
I'm from Glesgie so that makes it c) religion, d) national costume, if I tuck it
in my sock and a) work, if you go back a few decades.
So I'm probably safe from Stop And Search. Do you know how hard it is to cut
paper at least with a clean edge?
>> As for the Glasgow jokes, received wisdom says it's classed as suicide ;)
>
>Nicolas managed to decipher my thick Brummie accent correctly.
You're lucky, no one understands me except for my wife and she understands me
only too well ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
