POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Pachelbel Rant Server Time
11 Oct 2024 03:17:22 EDT (-0400)
  Pachelbel Rant (Message 27 to 36 of 36)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 21 Jan 2008 19:33:50
Message: <479539ee$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> 
>  > While I haven't read the book, I talked to my brother who had.
>  > According to what he said, you're incorrect. Many people react the
>  > same way to music, inside the brain at least.
>  >
> 
> I'm no expert, but this doesn't "ring true." I feel like I have 
> completely different reactions "inside the brain" to different types of 
> music and that non-music things sometimes produce identical reactions to 
> some types of music. So, everyone's reacting to "music" in such a 
> universal way seems impossible. I suppose much depends on the "music" 
> used in the study. I could buy that most people react the same way to 
> Wagner ... but to Ween??
> 
> -Shay

You can have completely different reactions to different types of music 
but how do you know what components or the reaction are brain dependent. 
  I mean two people may react differently to music, even to the point 
where one doesn't even recognize the stimulus *as* being music, yet 
there may still be commonalities in how their brain function is 
affected.  It has always been my naive belief, for instance, that 
classical music with its pace and intricacies appealed more to the mind, 
while rock with its pounding rhythms was more addressed to the body, 
(even to the point of perceiving rock music directly through the tactile 
sensors of the body.) Now I can even imagine that those different styles 
actually induce activities in the brain in different ways in connection 
with the different characteristics and qualities of the music.  But I 
can also imagine that those same brain patterns are the same in widely 
different people, and can still lead to very different interpretations 
of the stimulus, including if it is music at all, if it is music I like, 
if it is music that suits my present mood etc.  Maybe some people or 
some cultures don't like having their pelvises awakened.  Or maybe, as 
Warp points out, they never learned that this stimulus was supposed to 
have that effect.  Yet their brain could be reacting just like the other 
guys brain.

Hoping Darren keeps us updated on this book.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 21 Jan 2008 20:50:38
Message: <47954bee$1@news.povray.org>
Shay wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> 
>  > While I haven't read the book, I talked to my brother who had.
>  > According to what he said, you're incorrect. Many people react the
>  > same way to music, inside the brain at least.
>  >
> 
> I'm no expert, but this doesn't "ring true." 

I also remember he said it discussed things like why some music sounds 
omnious/spooky, while other music sounds triumphant, why some makes you 
tap your foot and others make you nod your head.

I think you'd probably agree that you don't have to like the theme from 
Jaws to get apprehensive when you hear it, and you don't have to like 
classical music to agree that Ode to Joy is not a sad song.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.


Post a reply to this message

From: bluetree
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 03:10:01
Message: <web.4795a4394158ffb1d68b7c570@news.povray.org>
Perhaps I may be wrong, but I agree with the fact, that every human has same
biological reactions to a stimulus:
Hearing it -> the stimulus, translated to electric pulses, triggers the
distribution of electrical signals from neuron to neuron to that part of brain,
which interpretes it.
I thought, I read somewhere, that any sound (independent from what it is (noise,
music...)) might be at first stress for the body.
But it really depends on the volume. Listening to loud music is similar to
physical pain, also if the person likes to listen to that music.
On the other hand there are therapies using special frequencies to ease pain of
patients.
Regarding to these observations humans have to have similar brain reactions in a
biological way.

Regards

          bluetree


Post a reply to this message

From: bluetree
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 03:40:00
Message: <web.4795ab5a4158ffb1d68b7c570@news.povray.org>
BTW I don't know, what effect might music have to animals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfh4Vih1_G8

:-) Nice bird.


                    bluetree


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 07:07:34
Message: <4795dc86$1@news.povray.org>
"bluetree" wrote:
> BTW I don't know, what effect might music have to animals.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfh4Vih1_G8
>
> :-) Nice bird.

ROFL!

OMG it has far more sense of rythm than my girlfriend... :P

Rune
-- 
http://runevision.com


Post a reply to this message

From: bluetree
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 07:50:00
Message: <web.4795e5a24158ffb1d68b7c570@news.povray.org>
"Rune" <aut### [at] runevisioncom> wrote:
> "bluetree" wrote:
> > BTW I don't know, what effect might music have to animals.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfh4Vih1_G8
> >
> > :-) Nice bird.
>
> ROFL!
>
> OMG it has far more sense of rythm than my girlfriend... :P

Rough.
Be glad, that she doesn't read your post, does she.   ;-)

But to tell the truth, it is quite more lithesome than myself. :-D

bluetree


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 10:21:51
Message: <47960a0f$1@news.povray.org>
"bluetree" wrote:
> "Rune" wrote:
>> "bluetree" wrote:
>> > BTW I don't know, what effect might music have to animals.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qfh4Vih1_G8
>> >
>> > :-) Nice bird.
>>
>> ROFL!
>>
>> OMG it has far more sense of rythm than my girlfriend... :P
>
> Rough.
> Be glad, that she doesn't read your post, does she.   ;-)

No, but I don't think she'd mind though. She's the first to admit that she 
doesn't have much rythm, and besides, she have a sense of humor. ;) Also, 
she's improving.

> But to tell the truth, it is quite more lithesome than myself. :-D

Quite more than me too... :P

Rune
-- 
http://runevision.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 13:38:01
Message: <47963809@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
 >
 > I think you'd probably agree that you don't have to like the theme
 > from Jaws to get apprehensive when you hear it, and you don't have
 > to like classical music to agree that Ode to Joy is not a sad
 > song.

That's almost cheating. Songs could easily be chosen for which the 
response is not as obvious.

How about "Foggy Mountain Breakdown"?
Singing monks make some apprehensive, some pensive, some rapturous.
Bach: ominous on organ - regal on harpsichord.

It's easy to make the case in the book when we select from genre-ized 
music which has already been squeezed into categories based on how it 
makes most people feel.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 13:41:24
Message: <479638d4@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:
 >
 > You can have completely different reactions to different types of
 > music but how do you know what components or the reaction are brain
 > dependent.

Mood. Triggered memory. Pulse rate. All seem obviously "instinctive (or 
strongly conditioned) and subconscious."

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Pachelbel Rant
Date: 22 Jan 2008 15:56:46
Message: <4796588e$1@news.povray.org>
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message 
news:47952017$1@news.povray.org...
> Warp wrote:
>>   That may be a *conscious*, learned way of reacting, but I think the 
>> subject
>> was about how the brain reacts instinctively, subconsciously.
>
> Yah. I mean, everyone reacts to getting punched in the nose by feeling 
> pain. It's the *response* to that, running away, punching back, crying, 
> that differs. That's what I'm trying to say there.
>
> I'll bring it up again after I actually read the book. :-)

      Or get punched on the nose... ;)  Heh.

       ~Steve~




>
> -- 
>   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
>     It's not feature creep if you put it
>     at the end and adjust the release date.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.