 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rats - I just read the note on the function { pigment { ... } } addition
to the latest superpatch release. I hadn't noticed this before and it
can probably duplicate my patch's efforts and do more besides. Well, I
suppose the programming practice was good for me, and it forced me to
figure out how to get PoV-Ray compiled with the Cygnus compiler ...
<grumble ... growl>,
Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What latest superpatch release ansd where can I get it!
Mick
Michael Andrews <M.C### [at] remove-this readingacuk> wrote in message
news:374ED78F.18035FE3@remove-this.reading.ac.uk...
> Rats - I just read the note on the function { pigment { ... } } addition
> to the latest superpatch release. I hadn't noticed this before and it
> can probably duplicate my patch's efforts and do more besides. Well, I
> suppose the programming practice was good for me, and it forced me to
> figure out how to get PoV-Ray compiled with the Cygnus compiler ...
>
> <grumble ... growl>,
> Mike Andrews.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Mick,
Ron's released his generic superpatch source - he gives the URL in his
second reply to the 'We need Fresnel reflectance.' thread on
povray.programming. The compilation is up to you :-)
Mike Andrews.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> What latest superpatch release ansd where can I get it!
>
> Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 1999 18:51:11 +0100, Michael Andrews wrote:
>and it forced me to
>figure out how to get PoV-Ray compiled with the Cygnus compiler ...
I won't tell you about the makefile and code patches I posted
to povray.binaries.programming a few days ago to do just that,
because it might upset you even more. Though, to be fair,
those were for a console-mode version. If you have a GUI-version
makefile for Cygwin, I'd be interested in seeing it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 1999 19:09:59 +0100, Michael Andrews wrote:
> Ron's released his generic superpatch source - he gives the URL in his
>second reply to the 'We need Fresnel reflectance.' thread on
>povray.programming. The compilation is up to you :-)
I'm not sure "released" is the right word. They've been there for a
long time now. I just finally told the world where to find them.
The good news is, we have a long weekend approaching and I might be
able to find a large enough block of time to finish the documentation
and put the binaries online at last. My documentation guy seems to
have disappeared, so it won't be as nice as I had hoped, but it will
at least be there. And, by popular request, I have thrown MS Word in
the trash.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Ron
As I neither have the facilities or the knowledge to complile my own copy I
would love to know if you are planning to produce a windows compile as you
did before?
ATB
Mick
Ron Parker <par### [at] fwicom> wrote in message
news:374edd73.0@news.povray.org...
> On Fri, 28 May 1999 18:51:11 +0100, Michael Andrews wrote:
> >and it forced me to
> >figure out how to get PoV-Ray compiled with the Cygnus compiler ...
>
> I won't tell you about the makefile and code patches I posted
> to povray.binaries.programming a few days ago to do just that,
> because it might upset you even more. Though, to be fair,
> those were for a console-mode version. If you have a GUI-version
> makefile for Cygwin, I'd be interested in seeing it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 1999 18:22:29 +0100, Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>As I neither have the facilities or the knowledge to complile my own copy I
>would love to know if you are planning to produce a windows compile as you
>did before?
Of course. In fact, I have one already, except for the splash screen.
I don't have the 3.1e GUI source yet, but this one might work with the
3.1e editor anyway (no guarantees, though. It works for me, so far.)
I just need to add a splash screen, rewrite some parts of the docs,
and make a web page to put it on now that twysted.net is down. That
part is the hard part, because I'm such a perfectionist that I won't
be able to abide a simple white-background-black-text-no-graphics
webpage.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> and make a web page to put it on now that twysted.net is down. That
> part is the hard part, because I'm such a perfectionist that I won't
> be able to abide a simple white-background-black-text-no-graphics
> webpage.
I know what you mean I tend to have the same problem - but I also lazy so
life is a battle between getting it done well and getting it done at all!
I look forward to the update of superpatch it has become indispensible to
me. Most of the pics I have done recently have used it extensively and would
not have been either possible or as good without it.
Keep up the great work
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> And, by popular request, I have thrown MS Word in
> the trash.
That's kinda good. So what format are they in now? .txt? .html?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
<juh### [at] kolumbusfi> wrote:
>> And, by popular request, I have thrown MS Word in
>> the trash.
>
>That's kinda good. So what format are they in now? .txt? .html?
Probably .txt until I get some more time to go to some other
format. I'm thinking docbook or texinfo for the source, translated
to text or html as needed.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
