 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2016-06-01 07:11, also sprach Jim Holsenback:
>
> Any opinions about well placed sarcasm?
Sarcasm is a sign of intelligence.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sarcasm+as+a+sign+of+intelligence
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 6/1/2016 12:11 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> As for your comments I think you were being sarky to her. My usage of
> sarky is that it is a mild form of sarcasm. To illustrate a point in
> your case.
hmmm sarky ... never heard that term before.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/1/2016 10:15 AM, Bald Eagle wrote:
> "snarky"
>
that's the one that my friend used ... /had/ to beg to differ as i
wasn't trying to be critical
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/1/2016 8:40 AM, clipka wrote:
> I'd say sarcasm can be an expression of cynicism, but isn't necessarily.
had to think about that for a moment ... given the other responses i'm
guessing delivery and audience are import factors to consider as well
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
> "graveyard humour" that some professions and people have can be quite
> shocking to people not used to it.
your mention of waiting to see if you had to buy the bottle and John's
comeback at scot's being frugal is what prompted my query ... i've also
been told that my sense of humor tends to be on the dark-ish side
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/2/2016 1:03 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 6/1/2016 12:11 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> As for your comments I think you were being sarky to her. My usage of
>> sarky is that it is a mild form of sarcasm. To illustrate a point in
>> your case.
>
> hmmm sarky ... never heard that term before.
>
It is, I think, a variation of snarky
>>
>> that's the one that my friend used ... /had/ to beg to differ as i
>> wasn't trying to be critical
I beg to differ. To my ears/eyes you were being critical. But there is
nothing wrong with criticism. It doesn't always mean negativity. You
were being positive trying to help. Most people I know would have
laughed and said. Yes my hand does hurt I must try not to pick up any
more hot bricks.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/2/2016 1:25 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> "graveyard humour" that some professions and people have can be quite
>> shocking to people not used to it.
>
> your mention of waiting to see if you had to buy the bottle and John's
> comeback at scot's being frugal is what prompted my query ... i've also
> been told that my sense of humor tends to be on the dark-ish side
>
You're ex-forces (military). You cannot be a shrinking violet and live
in that environment. Unfortunately most people in civvy street don't
understand.
Working offshore it was not out of place to ask someone who was being
medevaced if you could have their locker or what size boots they wore.
A good friend of mine was shocked after telling me that she had a couple
of dodgy flights. When I said. "Remind me not to fly with you."
That was before she knew me properly.
It was also another country where saying that I was so hungry I could
eat a horse. Silenced the company.
What! What did I say wrong? :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 02.06.2016 um 14:29 schrieb Stephen:
> On 6/2/2016 1:03 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2016 12:11 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> As for your comments I think you were being sarky to her. My usage of
>>> sarky is that it is a mild form of sarcasm. To illustrate a point in
>>> your case.
>>
>> hmmm sarky ... never heard that term before.
>>
>
> It is, I think, a variation of snarky
... or a variation of sarcastic? Or a chimera of the two?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/2/2016 3:12 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 02.06.2016 um 14:29 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 6/2/2016 1:03 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 6/2/2016 3:30 AM, Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2016 12:11 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> As for your comments I think you were being sarky to her. My usage of
>>>> sarky is that it is a mild form of sarcasm. To illustrate a point in
>>>> your case.
>>>
>>> hmmm sarky ... never heard that term before.
>>>
>>
>> It is, I think, a variation of snarky
>
> .... or a variation of sarcastic? Or a chimera of the two?
>
Possibly a regional variation, snarky is new to me. But both seem to
mean sarcastic.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think I heard sarky used first, though Merriam-Webster online doesn't list it.
Snarky seems to be in more general use where I live, and it's in M-W.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/snarky
If you're offended, go find your safe space. :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
