 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2016 11:02 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 4/25/2016 6:47 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 25.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
>>
>> Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: The more precisely you know how to
>> open a package, the less precisely you know where the contents will end
>> up in the process.
>
> Ah well ... thanks for the Sheldon Cooper-ish response. I WAS hoping for
> something a bit more whimsical
It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 26.04.2016 um 12:51 schrieb Stephen:
> On 4/26/2016 11:02 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 4/25/2016 6:47 PM, clipka wrote:
>>> Am 25.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>>> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
>>>
>>> Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: The more precisely you know how to
>>> open a package, the less precisely you know where the contents will end
>>> up in the process.
>>
>> Ah well ... thanks for the Sheldon Cooper-ish response. I WAS hoping for
>> something a bit more whimsical
>
> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
Not just fiendish, but satanistic.
Abolish gay marriage and abortion clinics, and God will assist you again
in opening with ease each and every package you desire the contents of.
(Not including condom packages of course.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2016 5:09 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 26.04.2016 um 12:51 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 4/26/2016 11:02 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2016 6:47 PM, clipka wrote:
>>>> Am 25.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>>>> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
>>>>
>>>> Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: The more precisely you know how to
>>>> open a package, the less precisely you know where the contents will end
>>>> up in the process.
>>>
>>> Ah well ... thanks for the Sheldon Cooper-ish response. I WAS hoping for
>>> something a bit more whimsical
>>
>> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
>
> Not just fiendish, but satanistic.
>
Should that not be spelt Satanistic?
Nevertheless you are probably right.
> Abolish gay marriage and abortion clinics, and God will assist you again
> in opening with ease each and every package you desire the contents of.
>
Oh! I'll join. How much will it cost? )
> (Not including condom packages of course.)
>
Ah! over here they are sold in packs of three. A sort of Trinity if you
know what I mean.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 2016-04-26 12:43, Stephen a écrit :
> On 4/26/2016 5:09 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 26.04.2016 um 12:51 schrieb Stephen:
>>> On 4/26/2016 11:02 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>> On 4/25/2016 6:47 PM, clipka wrote:
>>>>> Am 25.04.2016 um 21:06 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>>>>>> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
>>>>>
>>>>> Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: The more precisely you know how to
>>>>> open a package, the less precisely you know where the contents will
>>>>> end
>>>>> up in the process.
>>>>
>>>> Ah well ... thanks for the Sheldon Cooper-ish response. I WAS hoping
>>>> for
>>>> something a bit more whimsical
>>>
>>> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
>>
>> Not just fiendish, but satanistic.
>>
>
> Should that not be spelt Satanistic?
> Nevertheless you are probably right.
>
>> Abolish gay marriage and abortion clinics, and God will assist you again
>> in opening with ease each and every package you desire the contents of.
>>
>
> Oh! I'll join. How much will it cost? )
>
>> (Not including condom packages of course.)
>>
>
> Ah! over here they are sold in packs of three. A sort of Trinity if you
> know what I mean.
>
Second time I've told that joke today:
A kid and his dad are in a pharmacy. The son points to the condom
dispaly and asks:
- Dad, what are those?
- That's when you'll be a bit older and you go on a date.
- Ah... and the packs of 3?
- That's when you have a girlfriend: Friday, Saturday, Sunday.
- And the box of 12?
- Sigh. That's when you're married: January, February, March...
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/04/2016 08:06 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
Why is it that all the shirts I possess that say "easy iron" on them are
the *only* shirts that even require ironing in the first place?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2016 5:58 PM, Francois Labreque wrote:
>>
>
> Second time I've told that joke today:
>
> A kid and his dad are in a pharmacy. The son points to the condom
> dispaly and asks:
> - Dad, what are those?
> - That's when you'll be a bit older and you go on a date.
> - Ah... and the packs of 3?
> - That's when you have a girlfriend: Friday, Saturday, Sunday.
> - And the box of 12?
> - Sigh. That's when you're married: January, February, March...
LOL I've not heard that one before. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2016-04-26 06:51, also sprach Stephen:
>
> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
Trump 2016!
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2016 1:31 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 25/04/2016 08:06 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> Why is it "easy opening packaging" generally isn't?
>
> Why is it that all the shirts I possess that say "easy iron" on them are
> the *only* shirts that even require ironing in the first place?
>
exactly!!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/26/2016 5:57 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2016-04-26 06:51, also sprach Stephen:
>>
>> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
>
> Trump 2016!
>
not drinkin' that kool-aid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Holsenback <spa### [at] nothanks net> wrote:
> On 4/26/2016 5:57 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> > Am 2016-04-26 06:51, also sprach Stephen:
> >>
> >> It is a fiendish plot to undermine the American psyche.
> >
> > Trump 2016!
> >
>
> not drinkin' that kool-aid
Every "candidate" for presidency this year is peddling Hemlock under a different
name, but it still tastes like Hemlock.
"I'm pondering the immortal words of Socrates, who said: I drank what?" --
Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)
Regards,
A.D.B.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
