 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Saul Luizaga
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's Giving MoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswers Poorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 05:43:03
Message: <5423e3a7$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
BTW When I call something stupid is because I deemed so after reasoning,
not for the purpose on insult, private server or not, and probably I
give an explanation why if it's probably not obvious.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Saul Luizaga
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's Giving MoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswersPoorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 05:51:49
Message: <5423e5b5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And I accept your apology the same way.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Saul Luizaga
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's Giving MoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswersPoorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 05:59:01
Message: <5423e765$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So you can reason... now use it on my post you rejected.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswers Poorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 06:02:37
Message: <5423e83d$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/09/2014 10:42, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> BTW When I call something stupid is because I deemed so after reasoning,
> not for the purpose on insult, private server or not, and probably I
> give an explanation why if it's probably not obvious.
FYI The English language is unforgiving with things like that. I believe
French is a more diplomatic language.
But we are using English here. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswers Poorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 06:09:13
Message: <5423e9c9$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/09/2014 10:39, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> I thought about it, it took my 2 seconds, both are possibilities, for
> example a myth like religion is false, because better thinking and
> methods debunks it, that doesn't mean that the few atheist that were
> tortured/killed were crazy/wrong, it's about reasoning and seeing which
> is more probable, I have, and will as long as I can. I'm always glad
> about friendship that comes through, which I consider as true friendship.
Well the problem with most religions is that they rely on Faith which is
outside of science. So no one can win.
You can prove something forever but if the other person believes (for no
other reason that he believes) you will not be believed. And your proof
dismissed.
Also the established religions have a lot of wealth and power from long
ago. They are strong.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswersPoorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 06:09:52
Message: <5423e9f0$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/09/2014 10:51, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> And I accept your apology the same way.
We are friends?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswersPoorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 07:14:46
Message: <5423f926$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-9-2014 12:02, Stephen wrote:
> On 25/09/2014 10:42, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>> BTW When I call something stupid is because I deemed so after reasoning,
>> not for the purpose on insult, private server or not, and probably I
>> give an explanation why if it's probably not obvious.
>
But that is assuming your reasoning is true. There may be several
solutions or your reasoning might be false. In that sense another
opinion is never 'stupid'.
> FYI The English language is unforgiving with things like that. I believe
> French is a more diplomatic language.
> But we are using English here. :-)
>
True indeed.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: andrel
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswers Poorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 09:04:00
Message: <542412B0.4050103@gmail.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What part of "don't answer this post" did you not understand?
On 25-9-2014 11:39, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> I thought about it, it took my 2 seconds, both are possibilities, for
> example a myth like religion is false, because better thinking and
> methods debunks it, that doesn't mean that the few atheist that were
> tortured/killed were crazy/wrong, it's about reasoning and seeing which
> is more probable, I have, and will as long as I can. I'm always glad
> about friendship that comes through, which I consider as true friendship.
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: clipka
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswers Poorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 14:11:49
Message: <54245ae5$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 25.09.2014 11:39, schrieb Saul Luizaga:
> I thought about it, it took my 2 seconds,
Ouch.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: clipka
Subject: Re: Senator Asks Official Why He's GivingMoreMoneyToPeopleWhoBreakTheLaw.HeAnswersPoorly.
Date: 25 Sep 2014 14:17:11
Message: <54245c27$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 25.09.2014 13:14, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 25-9-2014 12:02, Stephen wrote:
>> On 25/09/2014 10:42, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>>> BTW When I call something stupid is because I deemed so after reasoning,
>>> not for the purpose on insult, private server or not, and probably I
>>> give an explanation why if it's probably not obvious.
>>
>
> But that is assuming your reasoning is true. There may be several
> solutions or your reasoning might be false. In that sense another
> opinion is never 'stupid'.
... plus, labeling an opinion as "stupid" is usually taken to imply that
only "stupid" people can be of that opinion.
If it's "probably not ovious" why an opinion is "stupid", then how can
it be "stupid" in that sense?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
