Am 25.09.2014 13:14, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> On 25-9-2014 12:02, Stephen wrote:
>> On 25/09/2014 10:42, Saul Luizaga wrote:
>>> BTW When I call something stupid is because I deemed so after reasoning,
>>> not for the purpose on insult, private server or not, and probably I
>>> give an explanation why if it's probably not obvious.
>>
>
> But that is assuming your reasoning is true. There may be several
> solutions or your reasoning might be false. In that sense another
> opinion is never 'stupid'.

... plus, labeling an opinion as "stupid" is usually taken to imply that 
only "stupid" people can be of that opinion.

If it's "probably not ovious" why an opinion is "stupid", then how can 
it be "stupid" in that sense?

Post a reply to this message