 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 31.07.2014 15:44, schrieb scott:
>> As a matter of fact, my new flat has LED downlighters in the ceiling of
>> the kitchen. Consequently, no matter where you stand, you are ALWAYS
>> casting a shadow over the work surface. A normal light, suspended just
>> below the ceiling and throwing light in all directions, doesn't seem to
>> suffer this problem nearly as much.
>
> That's because they are downlighter spots, nothing to do with the fact
> that they are LED. You'd have the same issue with halogen spots.
> Kitchens often used to have full-sized fluorescent tubes, which actually
> worked quite well, they just went out of fashion.
I don't know about the UK, but in Germany such kitchen lights would
often not be fluorescent tubes at all, but so-called "Linienlampen" -
incandescent light bulbs in a tubular shape with a long filament and
special sockets.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linienlampe#mediaviewer/Datei:Linestra_with_visible_filament.jpg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I don't know about the UK, but in Germany such kitchen lights would
> often not be fluorescent tubes at all, but so-called "Linienlampen" -
> incandescent light bulbs in a tubular shape with a long filament and
> special sockets.
>
>
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linienlampe#mediaviewer/Datei:Linestra_with_visible_filament.jpg
Ooh interesting, never seen or heard of that before. I don't think they
were very common, if available at all here. All the ones I remember
always had the starter ballast in the side, which presumably is not
needed for the Linienlampen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> As a matter of fact, my new flat has LED downlighters in the ceiling of
>> the kitchen. Consequently, no matter where you stand, you are ALWAYS
>> casting a shadow over the work surface.
>
> Just turn on radiosity, that will solve the problem.
> ;)
Win.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/07/2014 05:20 PM, scott wrote:
> And are you planning to make the animation public?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s7I80H96CM
Worth it, eh?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16/08/2014 18:17, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 28/07/2014 05:20 PM, scott wrote:
>> And are you planning to make the animation public?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s7I80H96CM
>
> Worth it, eh?
Actually, yes.
Could you do it from another angle?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Worth it, eh?
>
> Actually, yes.
> Could you do it from another angle?
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/08/2014 10:15, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>> Worth it, eh?
>>
>> Actually, yes.
>> Could you do it from another angle?
>
> FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
OFFFFFFFFFFFF! :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 19:17:45 +0200, Orchid Win7 v1 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> On 28/07/2014 05:20 PM, scott wrote:
>> And are you planning to make the animation public?
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s7I80H96CM
>
> Worth it, eh?
Awesome!
Now change it to glass beads.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17/08/2014 01:04 PM, Nekar Xenos wrote:
> Awesome!
>
> Now change it to glass beads.
I did try it with mirror beads... doesn't actually look all that good.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 29/07/2014 08:18, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Reminds me of this:
>
> http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-28402709
It reminds me of something Invisible posted years ago.
Connected with The Amiga IIRC.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
