POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : The next chapter Server Time
29 Jul 2024 16:19:50 EDT (-0400)
  The next chapter (Message 25 to 34 of 104)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 11 Oct 2012 21:01:34
Message: <50776bee$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 07:35:52 -0400, Warp wrote:

> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> I'm curious how you manage to be within 17 feet of a computer when
>> you're skiing. ;)
> 
> He has a smartphone, of course...

#REF


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 17 Oct 2012 15:54:27
Message: <507f0cf3$1@news.povray.org>
>> Surely that is TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE! You're one of the 6 people in the
>> world working on cryptography!
>
> I'm not designing cryptographic methods - just employing existing ones.
> (Maybe.)

Actually... It turns out all of the cryptography is a 3rd party 
commercial library that we purchased. The code we wrote does no 
cryptography at all. Oh well...


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 13:15:19
Message: <5082dc27@news.povray.org>
On 10/7/2012 3:33, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> In terms of location, the building is literally 2 blocks from my front door.
> It's almost close enough to /walk/ to work.

TIL brits don't go outdoors. :-)

> I wrote quite a lot of C# code for somebody who doesn't "know" C# yet.
> Obviously it was all exercises. And they were really more interested in my
> problem-solving approach (and social skills) than the actual code produced
> (which was obviously trivial).

Congrats. This sounds like a great job to land.

> that after all this I can actually DO the job! O_O

Of course you can. C# is actually a pretty straight-forward imperative 
language unless you start getting into very weird-ass stuff like generating 
code on the fly or something like that. It's a pretty big language, most of 
which makes sense.

> PS. My quip about Mordor seems tame compared to some of the jokes I heard
> offered in the office. Indeed, that quip may even by why they invited me
> back in the first place... (But that's just speculation on my part.)

I wouldn't be surprised.

Again, congrats!

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "They're the 1-800-#-GORILA of the telecom business."


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 13:19:09
Message: <5082dd0d@news.povray.org>
On 10/8/2012 14:00, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> something called LINQ, which seems to be of very dubious usefulness. (Unless
> you're actually writing database applications, anyway...)

FWIW, LINQ is list comprehensions, except with a vaguely SQL-like syntax. 
Now you're good to go. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "They're the 1-800-#-GORILA of the telecom business."


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 13:28:32
Message: <5082df40$1@news.povray.org>
On 20/10/2012 6:15 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 10/7/2012 3:33, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:

>> It's almost close enough to /walk/ to work.
>
> TIL brits don't go outdoors. :-)

Strange! And here's me thinking that it was Americans who had forgotten 
how to walk. I've heard that you only go outdoors in an automobile.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 13:47:40
Message: <5082e3bc$1@news.povray.org>
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:28:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 20/10/2012 6:15 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> On 10/7/2012 3:33, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> 
>>> It's almost close enough to /walk/ to work.
>>
>> TIL brits don't go outdoors. :-)
> 
> Strange! And here's me thinking that it was Americans who had forgotten
> how to walk. I've heard that you only go outdoors in an automobile.

There are places that can be true, particularly in the colder climes.  I 
remember days growing up where it was -70F outside (with the wind chill) 
- you wouldn't WANT to go outdoors in that if you could avoid it. ;)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 13:53:40
Message: <5082e524$1@news.povray.org>
On 10/20/2012 10:28, Stephen wrote:
> On 20/10/2012 6:15 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> On 10/7/2012 3:33, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
>>> It's almost close enough to /walk/ to work.
>>
>> TIL brits don't go outdoors. :-)
>
> Strange! And here's me thinking that it was Americans who had forgotten how
> to walk. I've heard that you only go outdoors in an automobile.

That's just Los Angelos. San Diego walks everywhere. The rest of the country 
walks or rides depending how fat they are. :-)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "They're the 1-800-#-GORILA of the telecom business."


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 14:14:01
Message: <5082e9e9$1@news.povray.org>
On 20/10/2012 06:19 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 10/8/2012 14:00, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>> something called LINQ, which seems to be of very dubious usefulness.
>> (Unless
>> you're actually writing database applications, anyway...)
>
> FWIW, LINQ is list comprehensions, except with a vaguely SQL-like
> syntax. Now you're good to go. :-)

I'm also not a fan of list comprehensions. Everything they can do can 
also be done using monads. And in fact, in the latest GHC releases, 
"list" comprehensions can be used for any monad. So really, it's just 
different syntax for stuff you can already do. So why bother?


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 15:32:42
Message: <5082fc5a$1@news.povray.org>
On 10/20/2012 11:14, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> So really, it's just different
> syntax for stuff you can already do. So why bother?

Every programming language is just different syntax for stuff you can do 
already in assembler. So?

Once you work with a language that does *not* have monads or list 
comprehension, get back to me on whether it's useful to bother with. :-)

And you know what? What do you think LINQ is simplified syntax for? Look at 
the underlying routines it translates into, and tell me if it's equivalent 
to monads. I'm honestly curious.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "They're the 1-800-#-GORILA of the telecom business."


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: The next chapter
Date: 20 Oct 2012 15:33:47
Message: <5082fc9b$1@news.povray.org>
On 10/20/2012 10:53, Darren New wrote:
> On 10/20/2012 10:28, Stephen wrote:
>> On 20/10/2012 6:15 PM, Darren New wrote:
>>> On 10/7/2012 3:33, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>>>> It's almost close enough to /walk/ to work.
>>>
>>> TIL brits don't go outdoors. :-)
>>
>> Strange! And here's me thinking that it was Americans who had forgotten how
>> to walk. I've heard that you only go outdoors in an automobile.
>
> That's just Los Angelos. San Diego walks everywhere. The rest of the country
> walks or rides depending how fat they are. :-)

More exactly, Americans drive more, and more probably own cars, but that's 
because Paris to Berlin is like a short commute by car for Americans. People 
who live in cities usually don't take cars anywhere.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "They're the 1-800-#-GORILA of the telecom business."


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.