POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : The end of an era Server Time
1 Nov 2024 17:19:21 EDT (-0400)
  The end of an era (Message 1 to 10 of 52)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Invisible
Subject: The end of an era
Date: 3 Aug 2012 09:08:27
Message: <501bcd4b$1@news.povray.org>
OK, so I'm probably not supposed to tell you this, but I'm going to tell 
you anyway...



Around about April, a bunch of big wigs from the USA come over and call 
an "all hands meeting". They like doing this. It never used to happen in 
the old days. But recently, the company likes to hold lots of pointless 
meetings. Usually it's just so some visitor can say "hi, my name is 
Fred, and here's all the fabulous stuff I'm doing to help grow the company".

Of course, nobody actually gives a fig. We don't /care/ which companies 
you've visited or what your strategic plan is. We only care about when 
the next batch of samples are going to arrive through the door. But 
still, the company likes to hold these pointless meetings.

So everybody gets squished into this meeting room which isn't really big 
enough and doesn't have enough chairs. And then these two Americans 
start telling us how the future is black as darkest night, and that 
there is simply no hope. "Fundamentally, there is no place in the market 
for a business unit such as this."

OK, so, uh, where are you guys going with this? C'mon, we've been stood 
here for half an hour now. Spit it out. What are you trying to tell us?

"We may have to close the UK site. We are currently entering into a 
consultation period. This is your opportunity to give us ideas for how 
we can keep the site open."

Now let me back up here for a moment. When I first joined this company 
10 years ago, they were making several million USD in losses annually. 
As far as I know, for the last 10 years they have never, at any time, 
made any kind of profit. Sometimes we made a big loss, and sometimes we 
made a small loss. But we /always/ made a loss.

On a site-by-site basis, the UK was usually the only profitable site. 
But that changed after our only member of sales staff left and the order 
books emptied. Since that day, the UK has never really recovered. It's 
always been exceptionally quiet. Has been for years now.

But there is hope: Top management finally agreed to pay out for some 
very expensive brand-new mass spectrometers. Not quite state of the art, 
but certainly high-end. Previously ALL of our mass spec equipment has 
been old junk that we got cheap because somebody was throwing it in the 
skip. We've never owned *new* equipment like this before.

We also purchased shiny new HPLC systems to go with it. These systems 
are really quite impressive; they record a complete history of the pump 
pressure, oven temperature, and inside leg measurement of the operator. 
We also purchased the latest version of the mass spec control software; 
we've only just finished installing and testing it. All this new 
equipment has yet to analyse a single sample. (At least, one from a 
paying customer. Obviously we've run all sorts of test samples...)

In light of all this, we've just signed two huge contracts with two 
brand-new customers, within weeks of each other. These contracts are far 
larger than anything the UK has ever secured before. They promise to 
bring millions of dollars into the company.

...and they're closing us NOW?? Just as we've turned a corner? Just as 
the equipment you just bought for us has started delivering multiple 
major new contracts?

Are you mental??

So anyway, we have thirty days to discuss this with management and try 
to figure out a way to keep the UK site open. That was what they told us 
in the meeting.

Now obviously, many of the people who work here have three kids and a 
mortgage. The /last/ thing they want is to suddenly be unemployed. So, 
as you can imagine, people are pretty upset. And more to the point, 
people are horrified that we've worked our arses off and successfully 
secured these vital life-giving contracts, and we're being shut down 
before we can even /start/ them.



Next day, things took a turn for the worse. The CEO gives an all-hands 
meeting for all sites via video conference. And what /he/ said is 
completely at variance with what we've just been told.

   "The UK site is being closed. Unfortunately, due to legal 
complications, we can't just /close/ the UK site, we have to allow a 
thirty day consultation period first. But after that, the site will be 
closed."

In other words, this isn't thirty days to decide IF the site can be 
saved. The decision has already been made. It's just that the USA has 
employER protection laws, while the UK has employEE protection laws. And 
those pesky laws mean you can't just destroy people's lives on a whim. 
You have to consider other options.

Or rather, you have to /pretend/ to consider other options. Because it's 
now perfectly clear that the company has /no intention/ of listening to 
our suggestions. The decision-making process is over. Our jobs are gone. 
There is nothing we can do about it.

Some of us want to drag the process out as long as possible, so we can 
continue getting paid. But it turns out, because the company is publicly 
traded, we're not allowed to tell anyone that the site is closing. Which 
makes it A LITTLE BIT AWKWARD when customers phone up to enquire how 
their projects are going.

So anyway, we elect a team of staff representatives, and they (together 
with the site GM, who will also lose his job) put together a 
hard-hitting presentation to our CEO. They present the facts:

- We've just signed two huge contracts, which will have to be cancelled 
if the site closes.

- It will cost a /fortune/ to close the UK site.

   - We have to buy out of the lease on the new mass spectrometers.

   - We have to pay to have them shipped back. (It takes 6 people to 
move one of these things, they're extremely fragile, and they cost 
$250,000 *each*.)

   - We have to pay to turn the lab back into an office. (Hint: It's 
never /been/ an office. It was built as a lab when the building was 
constructed, because we specifically asked for it.)

   - We have to turn the archive room back into an office. (It's 
currently a concrete bunker with a thick steel door and no cabling inside.)


means emptying it, hiring contractors to dismantle it, hiring couriers 
to remove the equipment, and hiring more contractors to build an office 
there, with cables and floors and walls and so forth.)

   - We have to buy out of the lease on the building.

   - We have to pay redundancy money to people who've worked here 10+ years.

The CEO is dumbstruck. He simply has no reply. He had absolutely NO IDEA 
we had just secured new work. He didn't know the half of what it would 
cost. When we asked questions, he simply could not answer. He was unable 
to provide any justification.

And that's because, for all the statements about the company's 
"financial situation" necessitating this action, this is /clearly/ 
political, not financial. Financially it makes no sense at all. What's 
/really/ happening here is that the shareholders are screaming for 
blood, so the CEO has to be seen to be visibly "doing something".

The shareholders don't work here. They don't know what's really 
happening internally. So they don't know that this is an utterly stupid 
idea. But we do. The trouble is, the shareholders wanted blood, so the 
CEO just decided, on a whim, that this was the right course of action. 
Didn't consult anybody, didn't research anything, didn't do his 
homework. That's why he didn't know about the new contracts, and that's 
why he vastly underestimated both the time-scale and cost of the closure.

The trouble is, now he's told the board of directors "we are closing the 
UK". We can't then say "Oh, sorry, I didn't actually bother to check my 
god-damned FACTS. It turns out this is actually a really bad idea. Let's 
not do it any more." So basically he's now committed to closing us. Our 
staff representatives made a compelling, water-tight case against 
closure. The CEO had no reply. But still, he completely ignored all of 
our arguments. The site is still scheduled to close.



Given the total futility of trying to reason with somebody who's mind is 
already made up, we unanimously vote to end the consultation period 
early. That means that we can be officially told when are release dates 
are. And then, at the eleventh hour... another all-hands meeting.

The company's last official press release said that we were closing one 
site and "considering restructuring options" for the UK site. Which, to 
anyone with half a brain, means "closing the UK site". So a company saw 
this and phoned us up to ask if they could buy us.

Let me repeat that: "Fundamentally, there is no future in the market for 
a business unit like the UK." And yet, within /days/ of closure being 
announced, we already have a potential buyer.

Yes, /clearly/ no future in the market. :-P

It goes without saying that the CEO had made no attempt to /find/ a 
buyer. He just decided to close it and that's the end of it. But given a 
choice between /spending/ millions of dollars to close us or being 
/paid/ money to sell us, the company is understandably very, very keen 
to sell. And we'd all like to keep our jobs, thank you very much.

Trouble is, we've just spent the last few weeks telling customers that 
we're closing. We've been shredding old paper work, deleting files, 
disposing of equipment... and now we might /not/ close? Does anybody 
have an UNshredder?

Still, it shows how much the CEO knows about anything. The UK site is 
perfectly viable. That's why somebody wants to buy it. Well, there we 
are. When this site started, it was a small independent company. Then it 
got bought by the Americans. And now it looks like it's going to get 
bought again, and become a third company...



It would be nice if that's how it turned out, wouldn't it? Ultimately, 
there was no sale. We don't really know why. Perhaps the company 
demanded too much money. Perhaps it's the fact that /now/ we have a 
completely empty order book and no hope of ever filling it again 
ourselves. But whatever it was, after several months of the purchase 
process progressing steadily forwards without incident, it was abruptly 
halted.

So first we MIGHT be closing, then we WILL be closing, then we MIGHT be 
able to talk sense into management, then we WILL be closing, then we 
MIGHT be being bought, then we ARE being bought, and now we're NOT being 
bought, so we ARE closing... Jesus, what a ride!

But still, at least now we all know where we stand...



But wait. Another all-hands meeting. Hmm, the company say they /might/ 
not be able to afford to pay us. (!!!) I presume I don't need to 
describe the atmosphere in the room when that one went down.

No no, wait, calm down... What the company /actually/ says is that they 
might not be able to afford to pay out all this redundancy money all at 
once. But what every employee heard was "can't afford to pay"...

So yeah, it seems they can't afford to pay us all the money they legally 
owe us all at once. So what happens is that we all go home, and they 
keep paying us as normal, until we have all the money we're supposed to 
have. Which should take until about Christmas.



In summary, as of the end of this month, I am officially unemployed.

Yay, me. :-?


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 3 Aug 2012 12:17:55
Message: <501bf9b3$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:08:26 +0100, Invisible wrote:

> In summary, as of the end of this month, I am officially unemployed.
> 
> Yay, me. :-?

Motivation to step up the job search - and while being paid full time pay 
to do it.  Searching for a job is a full-time endeavour itself (or can 
be), so it seems you're quite lucky to be being paid full-time wages to 
do nothing more than search for a job.

It doesn't get much better than that when it comes to becoming unemployed.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: nemesis
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 3 Aug 2012 14:10:01
Message: <web.501c12decf7a08f5352a052d0@news.povray.org>
ok, this was a decent WTF.  It packs more drama than in waggy's dissertation
tale.

why don't you apply for a position of writer for magazines or blogs or
something?  You can show them your long curriculum here in p.o-t.

oh, wait...

anyway, good luck.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 3 Aug 2012 16:05:40
Message: <501c2f14$1@news.povray.org>
On 03/08/2012 2:08 PM, Invisible wrote:
> OK, so I'm probably not supposed to tell you this, but I'm going to tell
> you anyway...

It is not necessarily the end of the world. Quite a few years ago I was 
made redundant from a job that I had had for twelve years, It was a 
great shock.  But I was forced to change and I did. I even went to the 
other side of the world to improve my employability (is that even a 
word?). It is time to expand your horizons. And it could work out for 
you, if you take your chances.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 4 Aug 2012 04:48:57
Message: <501ce1f9@news.povray.org>
On 03/08/2012 09:05 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 2:08 PM, Invisible wrote:
>> OK, so I'm probably not supposed to tell you this, but I'm going to tell
>> you anyway...
>
> It is not necessarily the end of the world.

Oh, sure. I didn't say the end of the /world/, just the end of a 
particular era. I don't know what's coming next, but it won't be the same.

> It is time to expand your horizons. And it could work out for
> you, if you take your chances.

Well damn, I've wanted to leave this job for years. I guess now's my 
chance...


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 4 Aug 2012 04:59:49
Message: <501ce485$1@news.povray.org>
On 03/08/2012 07:05 PM, nemesis wrote:
> ok, this was a decent WTF.  It packs more drama than in waggy's dissertation
> tale.

It's been one hell of a rollercoaster ride. Every time you think nothing 
else can possibly happen... something else happens. I tried to bring 
that out, but one short page of text can't really convey 5 months of ups 
and downs.

> why don't you apply for a position of writer for magazines or blogs or
> something?  You can show them your long curriculum here in p.o-t.
>
> oh, wait...

Bukkake.

[The Wikipedia article has pictures now.]

Or perhaps that should be "anime"...

> anyway, good luck.

Yeah. I'll need it...


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: A small episode
Date: 4 Aug 2012 08:29:52
Message: <501d15c0$1@news.povray.org>
On 03/08/2012 02:08 PM, Invisible wrote:
> Around about April, a bunch of big wigs from the USA come over and call
> an "all hands meeting".

> "We may have to close the UK site. We are currently entering into a
> consultation period. This is your opportunity to give us ideas for how
> we can keep the site open."

> ...and they're closing us NOW?? Just as we've turned a corner? Just as
> the equipment you just bought for us has started delivering multiple
> major new contracts?
>
> Are you mental??

Heh. I left out the best part...



First, this meeting happened. And then, THE VERY NEXT DAY, I was 
checking an email and I noticed that I had a message from Google. You 
know, the famous Internet giant? THAT Google. It's a message from a 
recruiter wanting to set up a telephone interview with me.

So, one day I'm told I don't have a job any more, and THE NEXT DAY I'm 
told that Google want to interview me.

Can you say "fate"??



...well, that was April. As you can probably tell by the fact that I'm 
not dancing around the place in manic euphoria, I didn't get the job.

The interview seemed to be going great. And then the guy starts asking 
me questions like "how many entries does an I-node hold?" and "what is 
the name of the kernel function which returns most of the main 
information about a directory entry?"

Uh, yeah, I have absolutely no idea, man. I've used Linux once or twice, 
but I have NO FREAKING IDEA about really low-level details like 
filesystem data structures or kernel APIs or anything. (Apparently the 
answer to the second question is lstat(). I thought it might be fstat(), 
but that's for files, not directories...)

So... yeah. Apparently the specific job I applied for has really 
low-level knowledge of Linux as a /hard requirement/, not negotiable. So 
that was pretty much the end of the interview process. Within minutes 
the guy was off the phone.

Maybe it was fate. Fate trying to tell me that I'm aiming way, way too 
high. :-/


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: A small episode
Date: 4 Aug 2012 11:06:29
Message: <501d3a75$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>
> Maybe it was fate. Fate trying to tell me that I'm aiming way, way too
> high. :-/

Or more precise, too low(-level) :-P.

-Aero


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: The end of an era
Date: 4 Aug 2012 11:13:12
Message: <501d3c08$1@news.povray.org>
On 04/08/2012 9:48 AM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> Oh, sure. I didn't say the end of the /world/, just the end of a
> particular era. I don't know what's coming next, but it won't be the same.

That is always the case life moves on. Just when you are getting 
comfortable something will change.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid Win7 v1
Subject: Re: A small episode
Date: 4 Aug 2012 11:16:08
Message: <501d3cb8@news.povray.org>
On 04/08/2012 04:06 PM, Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it was fate. Fate trying to tell me that I'm aiming way, way too
>> high. :-/
>
> Or more precise, too low(-level) :-P.

*facepalm*


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.