 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/04/2012 11:48 AM, Invisible wrote:
> On 30/04/2012 11:42 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> What was that sound? Oh, yes, the sound of the joke flying past and
>> hitting the ceiling.
>
> Do you have any idea who you're talking to here? :-P
Someone who thinks a naval destroyer is a hula hoop with a nail in it? :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:59:20 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 30/04/2012 11:48 AM, Invisible wrote:
>> On 30/04/2012 11:42 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> What was that sound? Oh, yes, the sound of the joke flying past and
>>> hitting the ceiling.
>>
>> Do you have any idea who you're talking to here? :-P
>
> Someone who thinks a naval destroyer is a hula hoop with a nail in it?
> :-)
Wouldn't that be a 'navel destroyer'?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/04/2012 12:03 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:59:20 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 30/04/2012 11:48 AM, Invisible wrote:
>>> On 30/04/2012 11:42 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>
>>>> What was that sound? Oh, yes, the sound of the joke flying past and
>>>> hitting the ceiling.
>>>
>>> Do you have any idea who you're talking to here? :-P
>>
>> Someone who thinks a naval destroyer is a hula hoop with a nail in it?
>> :-)
>
> Wouldn't that be a 'navel destroyer'?
>
Indeed it would ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Do you have any idea who you're talking to here? :-P
>
> Someone who thinks a naval destroyer is a hula hoop with a nail in it? :-)
CANNOT UNSEE. >_<
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30/04/2012 12:17 PM, Invisible wrote:
>>
>> Someone who thinks a naval destroyer is a hula hoop with a nail in it?
>> :-)
>
> CANNOT UNSEE. >_<
Mu (無)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 4/27/2012 4:14 AM, Invisible wrote:
> I'm a big fan of the TV series NCIS. But sometimes it really makes me
> laugh.
>
> For those that don't know, the series follows the exploits of a
> fictional team working for the US Navel Criminal Investigative Service.
> Considering it's a show about people who investigate murders and other
> violent crimes, it's actually surprisingly humorous. Naturally every
> investigation is different, and the guy who did it is never, ever who
> you think it was.
>
> The characters are pretty much what you'd expect:
>
> - There's the team leader, the intense, silent authority figure that
> everybody both fears and deeply respects. He has a strong sense of moral
> justice and can be guaranteed to always do what's right, regardless of
> what the rule book says. He can read people like a book, he knows how to
> make people talk, and he always figures it out before everybody else
> does. Being an older guy, he is completely inept with any technology
> more modern than a telephone.
>
> - There's the wildcard. The smug, annoying, arrogant self-important
> jerk. Always wisecracking, always quoting obscure movie references. He
> thinks he is The Big, Mr Big, The Cool Guy. And the ladies are always
> all over him - as he constantly reminds everybody, every three seconds.
> In short, he has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. And yet, everybody
> really likes him, for no defined reason.
I don't.
> - There's the obligatory computer nerd. He can crack any cipher, and
> hack any computer system. (Unless it doesn't suit the script writer for
> today's episode.) Naturally, the guy is a high-calibre wimp. Oh, he will
> tackle people to the ground. But somehow he manages to make even that
> look wimpy. And he's really easy to intimidate. (Although, there was
> that one episode... nevermind.)
And when he is temporarily reassigned to the cyberwarfare department,
the other geeks call him boss.
> Also, something bothers me: I'm PRETTY SURE that if a suspect refuses to
> give you a DNA sample, then you CANNOT simply offer them a drink, and
> then lift their fingerprints and DNA from the glass afterwards. It
> strikes me that there must be some kind of LAW against that kind of
> thing. (Otherwise why would you even need consent in the first place?)
Well, sometimes you want a sample without him knowing that you got one.
Generally speaking, if the police don't need your consent, then
cooperation is mandatory. (Telling an Icelandic policeman that you
won't be giving the blood sample he has requested results in you getting
held down by as many policemen as it takes. Or at least that's what
they told US military servicemen who were assigned to Iceland in 1992.)
The silly one I saw was when a computer in the lab was being hacked.
You could tell because windows kept opening up rapidly, JUST LIKE IN
REAL LIFE!!!111!!1!1!!! The Geek and the Lab Goth were both typing on
the same keyboard trying to stop this. (In a rare fit of accuracy, this
did not work.) The attack stopped when the Boss pulled the power cord
on the machine. (I would have pulled the network cable.)
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> - There's the wildcard. The smug, annoying, arrogant self-important
>> jerk. Always wisecracking, always quoting obscure movie references. He
>> thinks he is The Big, Mr Big, The Cool Guy. And the ladies are always
>> all over him - as he constantly reminds everybody, every three seconds.
>> In short, he has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. And yet, everybody
>> really likes him, for no defined reason.
>
> I don't.
Me neither. He's the most unlikeable guy in the show.
>> - There's the obligatory computer nerd. He can crack any cipher, and
>> hack any computer system. (Unless it doesn't suit the script writer for
>> today's episode.) Naturally, the guy is a high-calibre wimp. Oh, he will
>> tackle people to the ground. But somehow he manages to make even that
>> look wimpy. And he's really easy to intimidate. (Although, there was
>> that one episode... nevermind.)
>
> And when he is temporarily reassigned to the cyberwarfare department,
> the other geeks call him boss.
Yeah, but that's probably just out of reverence for a guy who's a bigger
nerd than they are.
>> Also, something bothers me: I'm PRETTY SURE that if a suspect refuses to
>> give you a DNA sample, then you CANNOT simply offer them a drink, and
>> then lift their fingerprints and DNA from the glass afterwards. It
>> strikes me that there must be some kind of LAW against that kind of
>> thing. (Otherwise why would you even need consent in the first place?)
>
> Well, sometimes you want a sample without him knowing that you got one.
> Generally speaking, if the police don't need your consent, then
> cooperation is mandatory. (Telling an Icelandic policeman that you won't
> be giving the blood sample he has requested results in you getting held
> down by as many policemen as it takes. Or at least that's what they told
> US military servicemen who were assigned to Iceland in 1992.)
Yeah, but not in the USA or the UK, AFAIK. Both of these countries
require consent before collecting fingerprint or DNA evidence (although
refusing might itself be considered suspicious).
> The silly one I saw was when a computer in the lab was being hacked. You
> could tell because windows kept opening up rapidly, JUST LIKE IN REAL
> LIFE!!!111!!1!1!!! The Geek and the Lab Goth were both typing on the
> same keyboard trying to stop this. (In a rare fit of accuracy, this did
> not work.) The attack stopped when the Boss pulled the power cord on the
> machine. (I would have pulled the network cable.)
I very much doubt that Gibbs knows the difference between a power cable
and a network cable. And either way, it doesn't stop hostile code
running on your system, it just stops the program's diabolical master
from talking to it.
But yeah, it's pretty stupid all round. I blame this on the fact that
99% of the population have NO IDEA how computers actually work...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Sometimes I have to wonder though... Who is their scientific advisor?
> And do they know what they're talking about?
An even better question: How do they make the model dead people?
Because, damn, those things look EXTREMELY REAL! o_O
They must have an entire department that just /makes/ dead bodies.
Because they sure find a lot of them...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle <evi### [at] kosher hotmailcom> wrote:
> The silly one I saw was when a computer in the lab was being hacked.
> You could tell because windows kept opening up rapidly, JUST LIKE IN
> REAL LIFE!!!111!!1!1!!! The Geek and the Lab Goth were both typing on
> the same keyboard trying to stop this. (In a rare fit of accuracy, this
> did not work.) The attack stopped when the Boss pulled the power cord
> on the machine. (I would have pulled the network cable.)
In fact, pulling the plug may make things worse. If the hacking is done
to a server, then pulling the plug from a terminal isn't going to help
anything (it's unlikely that the server would be plugged in to a wall
socket right there in the lab). The only thing it achieves is to stop
the people using the terminal from trying to stop the hacking, until
the terminal is booted up again.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/05/2012 03:08 PM, Warp wrote:
> In fact, pulling the plug may make things worse. If the hacking is done
> to a server, then pulling the plug from a terminal isn't going to help
> anything (it's unlikely that the server would be plugged in to a wall
> socket right there in the lab). The only thing it achieves is to stop
> the people using the terminal from trying to stop the hacking, until
> the terminal is booted up again.
Yeah. If it's not Abbey's personal computer that's being hacked,
shutting it down probably won't help. I hadn't even thought of that...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
