 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/27/2011 10:17 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:27:56 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> Otherwise sane people, with jobs, claim they *know* that the government
>> is intentionally producing "chemtrails", on the basis of finding
>> Aluminum in water (the single most common element on the damn planet,
>> along side Silicon). Just saying...
>
> No, no, no, we all know it's because they've fluoridated the water. ;)
>
> Jim
Oh god, maybe they are doing both!!! lol
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/27/2011 10:18 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:48:25 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> Which is certainly true. But, the counter argument is that the guy that
>> stays on the plane, because he is sure that angels are carrying the
>> wings, will stay on the plane, while the guy that thinks they "zapped"
>> everyone, including the plane with an "anti-gravity ray", might just be
>> dumb enough to open the door and jump out. There may be no functional
>> difference between the two, but one has a bloody lot higher odds of
>> being right, or surviving, even if its by accident. lol
>
> I'm not sure what this is in reference to from what I wrote.....?
>
> Jim
Just saying, indirectly, that being right, for the wrong reasons, i.e.
belief in it, rather than knowing the facts, isn't *that* huge of a
problem, for the believer. They may be doing the right thing, for the
wrong reason, but they don't "step off the plane, in mid-flight", unlike
the twit that "believes" the exact opposite (such as believing that
climate is fake).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Patrick Elliott <sel### [at] npgcable com> wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 11:45 PM, Saul Luizaga wrote:
....
>
> Having a more modern, "We haven't a damn clue, but this sounds good!",
> version doesn't make it, or the witnesses, or the explanations, or the
> vague and inconclusive "evidence" that you see with UFOs any more
> reasonable.
Do not scoff. UFOs ARE REAL AND MOVE AMONGST US.
I have proof. Indisputable simulated photographic evidence exists which
confirms that UFOs (the Uncultured Financially Obsessed) not only walk
unchallenged among the human population, but also control each and every one of
the shadowy clandestine societies that secretly run the world, including the
Illuminati, the Trilateral Commission and the British Dental Association.
to the site.
,sdrager tseB
Mike the Elder
for a while and might actually get to it if another person or two would like to
join in the fun.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:36:13 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Just saying, indirectly, that being right, for the wrong reasons, i.e.
> belief in it, rather than knowing the facts, isn't *that* huge of a
> problem, for the believer. They may be doing the right thing, for the
> wrong reason, but they don't "step off the plane, in mid-flight", unlike
> the twit that "believes" the exact opposite (such as believing that
> climate is fake).
OIC. The problem is that being right for the wrong reasons reinforces
superstitious beliefs and other cognitive errors.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
either way, they could be either denying or acknowledging that
unidentified flying objects were alien tech indeed. From Russia.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/28/2011 8:25 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:36:13 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>
>> Just saying, indirectly, that being right, for the wrong reasons, i.e.
>> belief in it, rather than knowing the facts, isn't *that* huge of a
>> problem, for the believer. They may be doing the right thing, for the
>> wrong reason, but they don't "step off the plane, in mid-flight", unlike
>> the twit that "believes" the exact opposite (such as believing that
>> climate is fake).
>
> OIC. The problem is that being right for the wrong reasons reinforces
> superstitious beliefs and other cognitive errors.
>
> Jim
Yeah. But, if your the guy trying to fix something, you can at least
work with it. lol
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/10/2011 3:09 AM, Darren New wrote:
> On 10/27/2011 10:16, Stephen wrote:
>> On 27/10/2011 5:43 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> It's complete bunk.
>>
>> So, say you. Earthling!
>
> Say-a what you-a will, Monkey boy!
>
So insults we trade, corporeal being.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 28/10/2011 3:09 AM, Darren New wrote:
> > On 10/27/2011 10:16, Stephen wrote:
> >> On 27/10/2011 5:43 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> >>> It's complete bunk.
> >>
> >> So, say you. Earthling!
> >
> > Say-a what you-a will, Monkey boy!
> >
> So insults we trade, corporeal being.
Don't worry. When the New World Order is established by the One World
Government under the supervision of the reptilians, all such disagreements
will become obsolete.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:52:06 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> On 10/28/2011 8:25 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:36:13 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
>>
>>> Just saying, indirectly, that being right, for the wrong reasons, i.e.
>>> belief in it, rather than knowing the facts, isn't *that* huge of a
>>> problem, for the believer. They may be doing the right thing, for the
>>> wrong reason, but they don't "step off the plane, in mid-flight",
>>> unlike the twit that "believes" the exact opposite (such as believing
>>> that climate is fake).
>>
>> OIC. The problem is that being right for the wrong reasons reinforces
>> superstitious beliefs and other cognitive errors.
>>
>> Jim
> Yeah. But, if your the guy trying to fix something, you can at least
> work with it. lol
Read an interesting blog post by Jen McCreight last night, where she
posed the question "why is it that we don't grant people who believe that
airplanes fly because of fairies degrees in aeronautical engineering, but
we grant people who don't believe in evolution degrees in
microbiology?" (I'm paraphrasing here).
The "Puddingologists" don't get degrees in geology, either.
Funny, that. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:37:16 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> On 28/10/2011 3:09 AM, Darren New wrote:
>> > On 10/27/2011 10:16, Stephen wrote:
>> >> On 27/10/2011 5:43 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> >>> It's complete bunk.
>> >>
>> >> So, say you. Earthling!
>> >
>> > Say-a what you-a will, Monkey boy!
>> >
>> >
>> So insults we trade, corporeal being.
>
> Don't worry. When the New World Order is established by the One World
> Government under the supervision of the reptilians, all such
> disagreements will become obsolete.
Insert obligatory Douglas Adams quote here. :)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
