![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 4/5/2011 3:14, Invisible wrote:
> I would pay serious money to obtain hardware and software which isn't
> infuriatingly awkward to use. But unfortunately, that doesn't appear to be
> an option. Nobody makes it.
I have found that is just plain how it works in video. I'm not sure why. I
haven't been able to find a capture card that will process HD coming off a
TV cable, in spite of every TV having this capability. The few capture cards
that *seem* to have this capability require you to use their custom playback
software that only runs on the same machine where you have the card plugged
in, which kind of defeats the purpose of capturing the stuff in the first place.
Find a set-top box that'll play files *and* record TV.
Don't even get me started on the PS3 usability failures. :-)
Every day I notice 101 minor things where I say "with a little thought (or,
if they didn't make the compromise this way) it would have been much less
annoying."
> I doubt integrating whatever 3rd party code they bought into their own
codebase was a five minute job.
You'd be surprised.
> What, fundamentally, can we do about this?
Shop someplace like Amazon where people give reviews that the company
doesn't get to vet.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Coding without comments is like
driving without turn signals."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 05/04/2011 04:50 PM, scott wrote:
>> How does that help?
>
> You don't read reviews before buying something?
No. But generally I don't buy hardware from Amazon anyway...
(Usually I only buy music from Amazon. And then only when I already know
what I'm trying to buy, so the reviews are irrelevant.)
From what I've seen, the reviews for just about *everything* are
unwaiveringly positive.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:54:23 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 04:50 PM, scott wrote:
>>> How does that help?
>>
>> You don't read reviews before buying something?
>
> No. But generally I don't buy hardware from Amazon anyway...
>
> (Usually I only buy music from Amazon. And then only when I already know
> what I'm trying to buy, so the reviews are irrelevant.)
>
> From what I've seen, the reviews for just about *everything* are
> unwaiveringly positive.
That's not been my experience. But more to the point, if you had a
problem and you don't write a review, you're not helping the next buyer
make an informed decision.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 4/5/2011 11:54, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> From what I've seen, the reviews for just about *everything* are
> unwaiveringly positive.
Maybe for music...
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"Coding without comments is like
driving without turn signals."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 05/04/2011 8:16 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> That's not been my experience. But more to the point, if you had a
> problem and you don't write a review, you're not helping the next buyer
> make an informed decision.
I agree.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 05/04/2011 06:07 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 4/5/2011 7:41, clipka wrote:
>> Am 05.04.2011 16:09, schrieb Invisible:
>>
>>> I have absolutely no idea whether these "server-grade" drives really
>>> *are* more reliable, or whether it's just a sucker tax.
>>
>> Server drives are designed to endure continuous use.
>>
>> Desktop drives are designed to endure lots of power cycles.
>
> The drives in a NAS are exactly the same as what you'd buy off the shelf
> in an electronics store.
>
> Google has a whitepaper telling about the drive reliability based on
> statistics from half a million disk drives. There's little correlation
> between "category" and reliability.
So it *is* a sucker tax then.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 05/04/2011 08:33 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 05/04/2011 8:16 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> That's not been my experience. But more to the point, if you had a
>> problem and you don't write a review, you're not helping the next buyer
>> make an informed decision.
>
> I agree.
Well, perhaps. Perhaps if I actually bought hardware from Amazon instead
of the 10^17 other suppliers, and for every single one I wrote a long
description of why it sucks, the manufacturers might lose 0.02% of their
sales, and a tiny few people would be spared buying one sucky product
only to buy another equally sucky product. I doubt this is going to
bring quality back to the marketplace.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> You don't read reviews before buying something?
>
> No. But generally I don't buy hardware from Amazon anyway...
You don't need to buy it from amazon, but generally enough people have
that there will be a good range of reviews from people using it in
different ways. After reading a couple of pages of comments it usually
becomes quite obvious if there are problems with the features you are
interested in.
Also check the "What people buy after looking at this page" section, it
seems to me like bad reviews certainly affect what people buy.
Is the recorder you have listed on amazon? If it is then I'd definitely
leave a review highlighting the points you mentioned here - you'll get a
much bigger audience and actually influence future purchasers. You
didn't even mention the make/model number here, so how are we meant to
avoid it :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Well, perhaps. Perhaps if I actually bought hardware from Amazon instead
> of the 10^17 other suppliers, and for every single one I wrote a long
> description of why it sucks, the manufacturers might lose 0.02% of their
> sales,
Amazon has about a 10% market share for online sales...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 06/04/2011 09:18 AM, scott wrote:
>> Well, perhaps. Perhaps if I actually bought hardware from Amazon instead
>> of the 10^17 other suppliers, and for every single one I wrote a long
>> description of why it sucks, the manufacturers might lose 0.02% of their
>> sales,
>
> Amazon has about a 10% market share for online sales...
How did you calculate that?
Also, what percentage of the total market is online sales?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |