 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=65805
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=65805
It's a pitty that you need a top-of-the-line gaming computer monster which
costs an arm and a leg if you want to play the game at full quality.
I bought the game, and my 3.4GHz P4 with a Radeon HD 3850 can only run it
acceptably at medium (or perhaps slightly above that if you don't mind having
about 10FPS refresh rate at points) settings. Still looks quite good (better
than eg. HL2), but not that good.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=65805
I LOLed at the "Now if only they could make it fun" comment. I've played too
many Peter Moleneaux games not to.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=65805
>
Those all look like the ToD screenshots that were posted a while back.
The quality is amazing, but how is this particular ToD mod different?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 escreveu:
> http://boards.polycount.net/showthread.php?t=65805
Looks like just regular Crysis with increased texture definition.
These look far more impressive:
http://www2.picturepush.com/photo/a/1673205/img/Crysis/Crysis-2009-05-03-00-02-57-70.png
http://www3.picturepush.com/photo/a/1662311/img/Crysis/Crysis-2009-04-30-20-06-28-60.png
http://img4.abload.de/img/2pblu.jpg
I see more of Crysis as an intense research in interactive CG than as a
game.
Some of the settings are pretty instructive as well:
; Post Processing
r_ColorGrading = 1
r_DepthOfField = 2
r_MotionBlur = 4
r_Flares = 1
r_MotionBlurShutterSpeed = 0.02
r_Coronas = 1
r_MultiGPU=1
; Shaders and Lighting
r_SSAO=1
r_ssao_amount=0.5
r_SSAO_darkening=1.255
r_SSAO_quality=2
r_SSAO_radius=2
r_SSAO_blur 4
r_SSAO_blurriness 1
r_Usepom = 1
r_sunshafts = 1
r_Beams=3
r_BeamsDistFactor = 0.01
r_BeamsMaxSlices=300
;HUMAN EYE
r_EyeAdaptationBase=0.001
r_EyeAdaptationFactor=1
r_EyeAdaptionBase=0.0
r_EyeAdaptionClamp=2.75
r_EyeAdaptionSpeed=0.1
r_HDRBrightOffset=128
r_HDRlevel=0.7525
; Shadows
e_shadows = 1
r_ShadowsMaskResolution=0
e_shadows_on_alpha_blended=1
e_shadows_from_terrain_in_all_lods = 1
e_shadows_cast_view_dist_ratio = 0.8
r_ShadowBlur=3.0
e_shadows_max_texture_size=1024
r_ShadowJittering=1.1
r_SSAO_downscale_ztarget=0
; Object Detail
e_obj_quality=4
ca_useDecals=1
e_decals_allow_game_decals=1
e_decals_life_time_scale=2
i_rejecteffects=1
sys_flash_curve_tess_error=2
e_view_dist_ratio=120
e_max_view_dst_spec_lerp=1
es_DebrisLifetimeScale=1
e_cbuffer_resolution=256
e_dissolve=1
ca_DrawFaceAttachments=1
ca_AttachmentCullingRation=60
e_terrain_occlusion_culling = 1
e_terrain_occlusion_culling_max_dist=200
; Vegetation
e_foliage_wind_activation_dist = 35
es_DebrisLifetimeScale = 1
r_DetailNumLayers = 2
r_VegetationSpritesTexRes = 128
r_DynTexAtlasSpritesMaxSize = 32
r_TexAtlasSize = 2048
e_vegetation_bending = 2
e_vegetation_min_size=0
e_proc_vegetation=1
e_vegetation_use_terrain_color=1
q_shaders=3
; Particles
e_particles_quality=4
e_water_ocean_soft_particles= 1
e_particles_max_emitter_draw_screen = 64
e_particles_object_collisions=1
r_UseSoftParticles = 1
e_particles_thread=1
; Water
r_WaterReflectionsQuality = 4
r_WaterUpdateDistance = 0
r_WaterCaustics=1
r_WaterRefractions=1
r_WaterReflections=1
r_WaterGodRays = 1
e_water_ocean_fft=1
e_water_tesselation_amount = 10
e_water_tesselation_swath_width=10
q_ShaderWater=4
e_phys_ocean_cell = 0.3
r_WaterUpdateFactor = 0
; Misc
e_max_entity_lights = 20
g_battleDust_enable = 1
g_breakage_particles_limit = 250
g_ragdollDistance = 35
g_ragdollMinTime = 15
e_terrain_ao=1
e_terrain_normal_map=1
i_lighteffects = 1
; LODs
e_vegetation_sprites_distance_custom_ratio_min = 1
e_vegetation_sprites_distance_ratio=1.8
e_cull_veg_activation = 90
e_view_dist_ratio_vegetation = 85
e_particles_lod=0.6
es_MaxPhysDist=60
es_MaxPhysDistInvisible=25
e_terrain_lod_ratio=0.6
e_view_dist_ratio_detail=80
e_lod_ratio=10
e_lod_min=0
e_lods=0
e_detail_materials_view_dist_xy=8192
e_detail_materials_view_dist_z=512
r_DetailDistance=20
e_terrain_texture_lod_ratio=0.1
e_view_dist_ratio=200
; FPS Gain commands
r_UseEdgeAA=2
r_TerrainAO_FadeDist=1
r_GeomInstancing=1
e_vegetation_static_instancing=0
e_gsm_lods_num = 5
e_gsm_range = 4
e_gsm_cache = 0
e_ram_maps = 1
e_dissolve = 1
source:
http://www.overclock.net/pc-games/498803-photorealistic-crysis-real-lifesis-mod-discussion-16.html
and more:
http://images.google.com/images?q=crysis+photorealistic+mod
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I see more of Crysis as an intense research in interactive CG than as a
> game.
It's not a bad game either. I have definitely played worse and more boring
games (even modern ones). Maybe not in the same league as eg. HL2 (there is
just something special about that game), but still a good game.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> I see more of Crysis as an intense research in interactive CG than as a
>> game.
>
> It's not a bad game either. I have definitely played worse and more boring
> games (even modern ones). Maybe not in the same league as eg. HL2 (there is
> just something special about that game), but still a good game.
I liked Crysis more than HL2, so I guess it's up to what you want out of
a game.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the thing that makes it most realistic is that the textures don't
seem to repeat. Maybe they do and it's very hard to see. Like, I see some
repetition on the panels with the letters, but nothing on the streaked bits
just above the wheel carriage below the letters up on the left.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I think the thing that makes it most realistic is that the textures don't
> seem to repeat. Maybe they do and it's very hard to see. Like, I see some
> repetition on the panels with the letters, but nothing on the streaked
> bits just above the wheel carriage below the letters up on the left.
Also they got the contrast between light and shade areas correct (a lot of
games get this totally wrong), and they use a global illumination system.
Those two things make a big difference to the believability of the scene
IMO.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> Also they use a global illumination system.
No, they don't.
According to Wikipedia, they use "occlusion mapping", which is a
comparatively cheap way to fake global illumination. (E.g., it works in
realtime, so if stuff moves around, the lighting changes.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
