POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Oops.. Server Time
30 Sep 2024 07:24:51 EDT (-0400)
  Oops.. (Message 11 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Gail
Subject: Re: Oops..
Date: 30 Dec 2008 14:10:21
Message: <495a721d@news.povray.org>
"Patrick Elliott" <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote in message 
news:495a6cc0$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Since when is "binaries" the same as "code", since that is the only other 
> interpretation of that sentence that makes sense at all. Mind, its 
> possible the author is too stupid to know the difference, but...
>

I haven't read the article yet, but from what I've heard from other sources, 
all that's leaked is the beta that was going to be publically released in 
just over a week.

Gail


Post a reply to this message

From: Gail
Subject: Re: Oops..
Date: 30 Dec 2008 14:18:34
Message: <495a740a@news.povray.org>
> "Patrick Elliott" <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote in message
> news:495a6cc0$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> Since when is "binaries" the same as "code", since that is the only other 
>> interpretation of that sentence that makes sense at all. Mind, its 
>> possible the author is too stupid to know the difference, but...
>>

Having read the article, there is no way that the writer means source code 
when he talks about code

"So if Microsoft wanted a broad collection of users to have access to the 
code, the company could easily make it freely downloadable and would not 
need to leak it."
"One reason a company might give the code to a selected number of people 
prior to release is to get some positive reaction to build excitement for 
the eventual release,"

Neither of those statements could possibly apply to the source code

Gail


Post a reply to this message

From: Patrick Elliott
Subject: Re: Oops..
Date: 31 Dec 2008 14:20:18
Message: <495bc5f2$1@news.povray.org>
Gail wrote:
> 
>> "Patrick Elliott" <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote in message
>> news:495a6cc0$1@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>> Since when is "binaries" the same as "code", since that is the only 
>>> other interpretation of that sentence that makes sense at all. Mind, 
>>> its possible the author is too stupid to know the difference, but...
>>>
> 
> Having read the article, there is no way that the writer means source 
> code when he talks about code
> 
> "So if Microsoft wanted a broad collection of users to have access to 
> the code, the company could easily make it freely downloadable and would 
> not need to leak it."
> "One reason a company might give the code to a selected number of people 
> prior to release is to get some positive reaction to build excitement 
> for the eventual release,"
> 
> Neither of those statements could possibly apply to the source code
> 
> Gail

Yeah, well. One can always hope for a bigger screw up.. lol

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Oops..
Date: 31 Dec 2008 14:56:39
Message: <495bce77$1@news.povray.org>
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Yeah, well. One can always hope for a bigger screw up.. lol

I'm honestly rather surprised that such things happen so rarely, myself.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
   see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.