> "Patrick Elliott" <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote in message
> news:495a6cc0$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> Since when is "binaries" the same as "code", since that is the only other 
>> interpretation of that sentence that makes sense at all. Mind, its 
>> possible the author is too stupid to know the difference, but...
>>

Having read the article, there is no way that the writer means source code 
when he talks about code

"So if Microsoft wanted a broad collection of users to have access to the 
code, the company could easily make it freely downloadable and would not 
need to leak it."
"One reason a company might give the code to a selected number of people 
prior to release is to get some positive reaction to build excitement for 
the eventual release,"

Neither of those statements could possibly apply to the source code

Gail

Post a reply to this message