Gail wrote:
> 
>> "Patrick Elliott" <sel### [at] npgcablecom> wrote in message
>> news:495a6cc0$1@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>> Since when is "binaries" the same as "code", since that is the only 
>>> other interpretation of that sentence that makes sense at all. Mind, 
>>> its possible the author is too stupid to know the difference, but...
>>>
> 
> Having read the article, there is no way that the writer means source 
> code when he talks about code
> 
> "So if Microsoft wanted a broad collection of users to have access to 
> the code, the company could easily make it freely downloadable and would 
> not need to leak it."
> "One reason a company might give the code to a selected number of people 
> prior to release is to get some positive reaction to build excitement 
> for the eventual release,"
> 
> Neither of those statements could possibly apply to the source code
> 
> Gail

Yeah, well. One can always hope for a bigger screw up.. lol

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message