POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : These words Server Time
25 Dec 2024 13:31:55 EST (-0500)
  These words (Message 41 to 50 of 166)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 11:35:42
Message: <480e05ce$1@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:

>> 'on-TON-druh' might be a rough approximation (apologies to the French).
> 
> "Critics of ad hoc pronunciation schemes point out that such schemas are 
> inherently self-referential, since they rely on the ability of the 
> reader to already know how a large number of words are commonly 
> pronounced. In addition, such schemas often assume a certain language, 
> dialect or accent on the part of the reader, and due to its popularity 
> in the US, this is very often a US accent."

Fair enough. This example works fine for both british and US accents, 
though.

:P


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 11:42:10
Message: <op.t90q89yuc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:56:36 +0100, John VanSickle  
<evi### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:

> Invisible wrote:
>> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/268
>>  How many of these words can *you* figure out, without looking them up?
>
> lush:  (1) adj.  harboring great quantities of life, esp. plant life.  
> (2) n.  a person given to excessive alcohol consumption.

Also a possible abbreviation of luscious.

> Oedipus complex:  n.  A romantic attraction towards ones own parent of  
> the opposite sex.

Less noted is the Jocasta complex which is the romantic attraction of the  
mother to the son.

> defenestration:  seriously, the act of ejecting another person or thing  
> from a building through a window of said edifice.

Ah so that's where deportation came from ;-)

> MILF:  Acronym of Mother I'd Like to Fuck

Yet another Simpsons reference - this time from the game and the  
NeverQuest level

Homer: Wow Marge you are one hot MILF
Marge: The word is elf. Elf!

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 11:48:49
Message: <d52s04phoq5affc01f4elmqjqdo5tllc9c@4ax.com>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:24:55 +0100, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>
>Damn Romans got everywhere. :-)

Not quite everywhere ;)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 11:50:30
Message: <op.t90rm7dmc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:41:54 +0100, Shay <sha### [at] nonenone> did  
spake, saying:

> Invisible wrote:
>> http://blog.orphi.me.uk/archives/268
>>  How many of these words can *you* figure out, without looking them up?
>>  Am I just supremely illiterate, or are these words actually rare?
>>
> You're not knowing these words supports my low opinion of geek  
> television and literature [1], which I have found to be typically inane.  
> What I can't figure out is why? Why are such an intelligent group of  
> people drawn so strongly to children's books and poorly written pulp  
> magazine serials?

Answer 1: Because geeks work their brains so hard they sometimes need to  
give them the equivalent of a nice sit down and a cuppa.
Answer 2: Because socially and emotionally that's what what geeks relate  
to most.

Pick one or submit your own :-)

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 11:59:40
Message: <480e0b6c$1@news.povray.org>

> What? do you propose we use IPA?

*I* would understand that easier!


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 12:00:56
Message: <op.t90r4lewc3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:48:31 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>  
did spake, saying:

> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:24:55 +0100, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Damn Romans got everywhere. :-)
>
> Not quite everywhere ;)

Everywhere worth going to

'I say Cladius let's conquer Scotty land so as to partake of the wonderful  
natural ice-cold springs and wander in our togas amongst the many thistle  
farms enjoying the bracing ice winds and snow and the joyous keening sound  
of the bagpipes.'
'Or we could just build a bloody great wall along the border to discourage  
any other idiots like you from trying to visit and keep the natives penned  
up in that hellhole*'

:-P

*I forget, was Glasgow around back then?

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 12:02:19
Message: <480e0c0b@news.povray.org>

> burro:  From the Spanish word for donkey.  There may be a slang meaning 
> of which I am unaware.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burrito


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 12:12:27
Message: <oh3s04lmhpfifg72n29nden5k1ovdnoqin@4ax.com>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:25:11 +0200, "Gail Shaw"
<initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> wrote:

>
>p.s. if you want to improve your vocabulary -
>http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/list/
>

or
http://www.readersdigest.co.uk/wordpower/
:)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 12:12:29
Message: <480e0e6d@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> wrote:

> > 'on-TON-druh' might 
> > be a rough approximation (apologies to the French).

> "Critics of ad hoc pronunciation schemes point out that such schemas are 
> inherently self-referential, since they rely on the ability of the 
> reader to already know how a large number of words are commonly 
> pronounced. In addition, such schemas often assume a certain language, 
> dialect or accent on the part of the reader, and due to its popularity 
> in the US, this is very often a US accent."

  Personally I also oppose that type of "pronounciation syntax" which
looks more like the writer is having rough sex than anything else.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Phil Cook
Subject: Re: These words
Date: 22 Apr 2008 12:16:05
Message: <op.t90stsdec3xi7v@news.povray.org>
And lo on Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:59:56 +0100, Nicolas Alvarez  
<nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom> did spake, saying:

> Mike Raiford escribió:
>> What? do you propose we use IPA?
>
> *I* would understand that easier!

Okee dokee

dublɑ̃ˈtɑ̃drə/ or /ˈdʌbəl ɑnˈtɑndrə

with UTF-8 that should display correctly.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.