![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
message de news: 4ba73122@news.povray.org...
>
> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
> news:web.4ba55e60e21b6680914fd7390@news.povray.org...
>> Not very roomy, but cheap enough to maintain!
>>
>
> Excellent work indeed! Woodgrain is very natural looking overall. Also
> good use of DoF. For once, I agree ;-)
>
Woaw PrtSc! ;)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Not very roomy, but cheap enough to maintain!
very cool image!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Here's an update with changes in texture layout and an isosurface rock.
Isosurface sure slows things down a lot.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'toy_boat.jpg' (174 KB)
Preview of image 'toy_boat.jpg'
![toy_boat.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.4bae7c49f00f113dab8b233e0%40news.povray.org%3E/toy_boat.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
jhu schrieb:
> Here's an update with changes in texture layout and an isosurface rock.
> Isosurface sure slows things down a lot.
Looks like it's worth it though.
As for the other changes, I'm not sure what to think of them:
- The holes for the "plug-ins" appear too prominent to me; I'd actually
bevel the holes' edges, while making them tight enough that the holes
themselves aren't actually seen.
- The beveling radius of the chimney seems a bit too large in my eyes. I
think this needs very subtle tweaking.
- I think the new wood surface texture doesn't look too good; seems like
you tried to achieve blurred reflections, but the noise is too prominent.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
An amazing image!
To flavor what clipka says, it is damp wood, maybe the boat still has
some water on it. The noise looks realistic to me, but I never had
wooden boats, only plastic ones. The glare, my mind reads as water or
maybe glaze, varnish, or what ever it is called.
The holes might look better beveled, but it was the very last thing I
noticed. The first thing I went looking for was the reflection of the
camera in the water.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 27/03/2010 9:44 PM, jhu wrote:
> Here's an update with changes in texture layout and an isosurface rock.
> Isosurface sure slows things down a lot.
Very nice, the varnish looks a tad rough and needs to be sanded down and
a new coat applied :-P
The word that Clipa and Sabrina are looking for is countersink or
countersunk.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Here's another one with a smoother varnish and beveled holes.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'toy_boat.jpg' (168 KB)
Preview of image 'toy_boat.jpg'
![toy_boat.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.4bb4bc85f00f113dab8b233e0%40news.povray.org%3E/toy_boat.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 01.04.2010 17:32, schrieb jhu:
> Here's another one with a smoother varnish and beveled holes.
Looks pretty good now to me.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 2/04/2010 2:32 AM, jhu wrote:
> Here's another one with a smoother varnish and beveled holes.
mmm, very nice.
zutroi
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |