 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> All good people will be together soon, leaving the dorks and dweebs to their
> nightmare .. tick tock,
> aQ
>
Bye, aQ. Don't let the door get you on your way out, watch that first
step, it's a doozy. Don't go away angry, just go away.
Rich.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> Does anyone know what has happened and if it will be able to be repaired.
It appears that the libmagick++ function used to detect image types
broke during the updates; hence, the program we use to pick up the
binaries from the news server and put them into the database was not
able to determine when an attachment was an image. It should be working
now for new posts. I will repair the old ones shortly (I'll have to
write some code to hit the DB and re-detect the type for the messages
already in there).
-- Chris
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Cason <new### [at] DELETE THISpovrayorg> wrote:
> Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> > Does anyone know what has happened and if it will be able to be repaired.
>
> It appears that the libmagick++ function used to detect image types
> broke during the updates; hence, the program we use to pick up the
> binaries from the news server and put them into the database was not
> able to determine when an attachment was an image. It should be working
> now for new posts. I will repair the old ones shortly (I'll have to
> write some code to hit the DB and re-detect the type for the messages
> already in there).
>
> -- Chris
Thank you for avoiding the pointless bickering and solving the problem.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
By the way, I have noticed that messages posted in the web interface lack
the end boundary marker when read through NNTP. It seems that the web
interface creates all messages as "multipart/mixed" -- and the start
boundary marker is always present -- but the end marker is omitted when
there is only one part (i.e. no attachment).
This is not something caused by the server upgrade; I see it in messages
from 2005 (which is as far back as my archive goes). I only noticed it
recently because Opera 10 points it out when earlier versions did not.
--
FE
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris Cason <new### [at] DELETETHISpovrayorg> wrote:
> Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> > Does anyone know what has happened and if it will be able to be repaired.
>
> It appears that the libmagick++ function used to detect image types
> broke during the updates; hence, the program we use to pick up the
> binaries from the news server and put them into the database was not
> able to determine when an attachment was an image. It should be working
> now for new posts. I will repair the old ones shortly (I'll have to
> write some code to hit the DB and re-detect the type for the messages
> already in there).
>
> -- Chris
Appears as if it may be working again. Thanks for fixing if indeed you did
Chris. (Or whomever was responsible)
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> Is there anyone that can actually figure out and fix what is wrong with the web
> interface? Looking at the image digest, it appears that the last valid images
> were posted:
>
> by Mike Raiford on 16 Sep 2009 17:19:20
> in 'Re: make_gemstone macro, old fashioned 8-cut'
>
Are you inferring I broke the web interface? :)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trevor G Quayle wrote:
>
> > Is there anyone that can actually figure out and fix what is wrong with the web
> > interface? Looking at the image digest, it appears that the last valid images
> > were posted:
> >
> > by Mike Raiford on 16 Sep 2009 17:19:20
> > in 'Re: make_gemstone macro, old fashioned 8-cut'
> >
>
> Are you inferring I broke the web interface? :)
> --
> ~Mike
Blame needs to be cast if you are volunteering.
It appears to be fixed now, plus the images from the time it broke to when it
got fixed are all there now, so you should get off with a light sentence: 100
reflective spheres on a checkered plane.
-tgq
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trevor G Quayle schrieb:
> It appears to be fixed now, plus the images from the time it broke to when it
> got fixed are all there now, so you should get off with a light sentence: 100
> reflective spheres on a checkered plane.
You forgot the "ego te absolvo" :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
