 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I revisited an older scene from 2002-2003 and updated/changed/added to it,
then rendered in version 3.7 beta 31. The smaller image is the old original.
I clearly had a strange notion at that time, of how media should look like
:-)
Still, in the latest version, some improvements are yet possible in media
samples, radiosity count and smoother aa. However, I am already satisfied
with this.
Elephant from the Taschen Collection.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Elephant Dream_revisited_05.jpg' (130 KB)
Download 'Elephant dream_original.jpg' (41 KB)
Preview of image 'Elephant Dream_revisited_05.jpg'
Preview of image 'Elephant dream_original.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> I revisited an older scene from 2002-2003 and updated/changed/added to it,
> then rendered in version 3.7 beta 31. The smaller image is the old original.
> I clearly had a strange notion at that time, of how media should look like
> :-)
>
> Still, in the latest version, some improvements are yet possible in media
> samples, radiosity count and smoother aa. However, I am already satisfied
> with this.
Very strong motif!
I don't like the contrast of the revisited shot, though. A *bit* more light on
the dreaming elephant, please!
Also, the shot looks to me like there is a wall outside, which I reckon is *not*
intentional.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Makes much more sense than the Blender movie. ;)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
news:web.49cbbfa84439681293bfb07f0@news.povray.org...
>
> Very strong motif!
Thanks!
>
> I don't like the contrast of the revisited shot, though. A *bit* more
> light on
> the dreaming elephant, please!
Correct. Between the two images, a backwall (with window) and a roof have
been added, and a spotlight removed.
>
> Also, the shot looks to me like there is a wall outside, which I reckon is
> *not*
> intentional.
Oh, but there is a wall indeed! and intentional too! :-) Between the two
farthest elephants. The dream is layered, you see?
However, the intention is to make the wall more irregular.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"nemesis" <nam### [at] gmail com> schreef in bericht
news:49cbe835$1@news.povray.org...
> Makes much more sense than the Blender movie. ;)
>
<grin>
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
>
> Correct. Between the two images, a backwall (with window) and a roof have
> been added, and a spotlight removed.
>
I kind of *like* the spotlight effect--looks more 'pictorial' (if less
realistic.) This is just my personal preference in images: more theatrical!
Almost to the point of non-realism. The way I 'see' my own images is with more
of a cinematographer's eye--heightened realism and lighting, as opposed to
plain old dull realism ;-)
KW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> schreef in bericht
news:web.49cc97ef44396812f50167bc0@news.povray.org...
> I kind of *like* the spotlight effect--looks more 'pictorial' (if less
> realistic.) This is just my personal preference in images: more
> theatrical!
> Almost to the point of non-realism. The way I 'see' my own images is with
> more
> of a cinematographer's eye--heightened realism and lighting, as opposed to
> plain old dull realism ;-)
>
I might indeed restore the spotlight (or spotlights even) but much dimmer
than in the original, and possibly more colorfull...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> Oh, but there is a wall indeed! and intentional too! :-) Between the two
> farthest elephants. The dream is layered, you see?
Oh - okay... that indeed explains why it *looks* like that ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
news:web.49ccff6a44396812208afb30@news.povray.org...
>
> Oh - okay... that indeed explains why it *looks* like that ;)
Yes, I know, the wall does not look too good here. It is a fast 'n dirty
difference of cylinders. My usual method of work: first a dirty job, then
cleaning the mess up :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I don't like the contrast of the revisited shot, though. A *bit* more light on
> the dreaming elephant, please!
I have viewed the new image on two different computers, and the contrast looks
completely different. On my Mac at home the contrast is looking pretty okay;
you can clearly make out the details of the little elephant. However, on my
Windows machine at work is pretty much solid black, hardly distinguishable from
the rest of its surroundings.
This is something I still struggle with with my own images as well. Depending on
the computer, the image format, or even the application I use to view it, the
image can look significantly different. This makes fine-tuning of the color and
light settings quite difficult of course.
Anyway, I like where this image is going.
Cheers,
Erwin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
