 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
*2* - *4* - *7* are my favourites from your list. I am sure there are
more...
Thomas
"Carlo C." <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
news:web.4979be26667ea30256efd9890@news.povray.org...
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1 - I believe in this philosophy: too much is better than too little, even
> for
> the HOF. :-D
> 2 - Because *fame* in Italian means *hunger*. And... I'm famished!
> 4 - Because I pove LOV... delete... I love POV-Ray! ;-)
> 5 - Just for fun, of course.
>
> 20 entry... are too many? Then I will choose 3: * 2 * - * 7 * - * 11 *
>
> Suggestions? (wink)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> *This list is not exhaustive (only reported in newsgroups, only 2008)*
>
> 1- http://news.povray.org/web.4783bd40ede40cd7c150d4c10%40news.povray.org
> 2- http://news.povray.org/47961654%40news.povray.org
> 3-
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/plus-something/2203032114/in/set-72157603745147634/
> 4- http://news.povray.org/web.47b1299720742c82ae42298f0%40news.povray.org
> 5- http://news.povray.org/47b13fd8%40news.povray.org
> 6- http://news.povray.org/web.47b154efd4d8861b2c03ad830%40news.povray.org
> 7- http://news.povray.org/480e840a%40news.povray.org (I wish both Donna
> Reed!)
> 8- http://news.povray.org/4838c4ef%40news.povray.org
> 9- http://news.povray.org/web.4865c0a3bd7cef9af06fe4d50%40news.povray.org
> 10- http://news.povray.org/web.4884733ae928bccebd1b3ad10%40news.povray.org
> 11- http://news.povray.org/web.48a3212ced5dba694adca9c0%40news.povray.org
> 12- http://news.povray.org/48bf7e44%40news.povray.org
> 13- http://news.povray.org/web.48e79b7c570d422cbd1b3ad10%40news.povray.org
> 14- http://news.povray.org/web.48fbd297b212fa4bd1b3ad10%40news.povray.org
> 15- http://news.povray.org/48ff3e3c%40news.povray.org
> 16- http://news.povray.org/web.490675f067d4b8052d55026c0%40news.povray.org
> 17- http://news.povray.org/492e46c0%40news.povray.org (a WIP!)
> 18- http://news.povray.org/web.4951bf16a9fdfb46bd1b3ad10%40news.povray.org
> 19- http://news.povray.org/web.47b97aa82625857d731f01d10%40news.povray.org
> 20- http://news.povray.org/web.477bb3e0cbfc471ab05f96f70%40news.povray.org
>
>
> --
> Carlo
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <tDOTdegroot@interDOTnlANOTHERDOTnet> wrote:
> *4*
Flattered, but does anyone have a more original mesh to put into the scene? I
think the HOF images should all show technique as well as artistic merit.
Needless to say, it would boost the latter of the two if it weren't just a
standard mesh on a simple background, in the style of a previous image. In
other words, "I'm not worthy! I'm not worthy!"
Oh, and 2, 7, 8, 17, 18
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan Connelly <djc### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> >
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.47b1299720742c82ae42298f0%40news.povray.org%3E/drag
on.jpg
>
> I love the effect of the subsurface scattering. It'll be exciting when that gets
into the 3.7 release.
AIUI, this shot was made with media effects to sim the SSS, so it can be done
with 3.6.1 as well...
But something that gives almost as good results at faster speed would be a great
thing of course.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Whoa, man! Thanks for taking your time to research into this. Nice
montage, some I've seen before but others are nice additions. p.b.i
really contain many gems... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka escreveu:
> Plus, add that "unfinished sphere" shot, by all means - if only for the sake of
> the ingenious concept!
Yes! :D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan Connelly wrote:
>>
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Cweb.47b1299720742c82ae42298f0%40news.povray.org%3E/dragon.jpg
>>
>
> I love the effect of the subsurface scattering. It'll be exciting when
> that gets into the 3.7 release.
Where can I find the dragon model? Is it available for free?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> clipka escreveu:
> > Plus, add that "unfinished sphere" shot, by all means - if only for the sake of
> > the ingenious concept!
>
> Yes! :D
I second that!
Here's something to contemplate: Should the HOF showcase images that only show
off POV-Ray's impressive 'strengths'? Or should it also include POV images that
have pictorial beauty, regardless of what techniques were used? (Of course,
having both at the same time is the ideal; but they are different philosophical
concepts.) I kind of sense that the general attitude is for including, first and
foremost, the 'strengths' side of things. I don't disagree; but that may be
slighting some of the more intrinsically beautiful or complex images in p.b.i,
those that have great subject matter, composition or what-not, but which may
not have gobs of radiosity, depth-of-field, SSS, etc.
Either type of image would be most welcome, IMO.
Ken W.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think #7 should be the one in color--er, Technicolor!
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C48114f66%40news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=297711&toff=350
Also, don't forget "The Tiffany Cheerio"...gorgeous.
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3Cweb.481a558661e81a8d97fbe7c20%40news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=297711
&toff=350
KW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:14:55 EST, "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
>nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> clipka escreveu:
>> > Plus, add that "unfinished sphere" shot, by all means - if only for the sake of
>> > the ingenious concept!
>>
>> Yes! :D
>
>I second that!
>
>Here's something to contemplate: Should the HOF showcase images that only show
>off POV-Ray's impressive 'strengths'? Or should it also include POV images that
>have pictorial beauty, regardless of what techniques were used?
Both IMO.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Severi Salminen <sev### [at] NOTTHISsaunalahtifiinvalid> wrote:
> Where can I find the dragon model? Is it available for free?
It is available at both
http://graphics.stanford.edu/data/3Dscanrep/
and
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/projects/large_models/
My strategy for getting it into POV-Ray was to import the GA Tech .ply model
into Blender, then use my own converter from .obj to mesh2, although you could
export a .obj file into Wings3D, then export it into POV-Ray. There's nothing
difficult about it; it just takes a couple steps to find programs that
import/export the right formats.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
