 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very cool image, especially the lighting. Two thumbs up :)
--
Dan
GoofyGraffix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Excellent job!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> Yes looks good. Not an impossible object but rather improbable
> architecture, as far as I can see. I wonder if anyone tried to
> build this in real life for an exhibition or so ;)
http://www.hiphopmusic.com/inane/2005/12/
Brilliant.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paul Fuller <pgf### [at] optusnetcomau> wrote:
> Get the arches, posts, railings, figures and gardens in there (with the
> same true to the original style) and I'll buy a print for sure :)
It'll feel a bit different from the original I think; the lighting isn't at
all real. But I'm trying for the same look!
> Oh yea - Isn't there meant to be a door and small balcony on the top right ?
Yes, there is, I will add it at some point. Not so much a balcony as a
doorway with a guard rail...
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for the comments everybody. I shall post high-quality renders as they
materialise. Test renders are very quick if I use the base union (no bricks)
- only a few seconds - but take 2-3 hours for radiosity and bricks.
The railings and arches won't be difficult, just tedious, but I'm looking
forward to the people. Shall I go for realistic or mannekin?
:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Thanks for the comments everybody. I shall post high-quality renders as they
> materialise. Test renders are very quick if I use the base union (no bricks)
> - only a few seconds - but take 2-3 hours for radiosity and bricks.
>
> The railings and arches won't be difficult, just tedious, but I'm looking
> forward to the people. Shall I go for realistic or mannekin?
>
> :-)
>
I vote for: Mannequin
If you are taking requests, can you please make the trees in the gardens
in soft fuzzy round topiary style ? Somewhat Dr Seuss.
Thanks.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So good! This is going to be another of your fantastic worlds.
Escher would have been proud.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> The railings and arches won't be difficult, just tedious, but I'm looking
> forward to the people. Shall I go for realistic or mannekin?
I vote mannekin (well, realistic in this case is mannekin since the original
work got mannekins ;-)
> :-)
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I wouldn't mind seeing this as part of an office
entryway, maybe with some office types having
sack luches on a bench in the foreground, or
walking in and out ignoring the scupture.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: web.467bb2a924130b2d731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> Hi all, thought I'd post this cos it's starting to look good. I
> coded the
> geometry in an ancient version of RayShade almost 15 years ago,
> recently
> dug it out and extracted all my coordinates. It's built from the
> ubiquitous
> eroded blocks - I just ran a load of inside() tests on a grid
> through the
> plain union to get them in place. I need to do some pruning to get
> the
> memory usage down but I'm pretty happy with the structure and
> lighting now,
> maybe just a little brighter.
>
> There's still a lot of work left though; arches, railings, people,
> ground/grass, trees, a few props...
>
> Comments and so forth welcomed as always.
as always : waouuuu !
http://trese.cs.utwente.nl/taosad/SoftwareArchitecture/Images/relativity.jpg
--
klp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
