|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like it, but th elighting is almost too dramatic for me - Imy eyes have
trouble seeng what is happening. I would move the bricks just a titch
closer together (even if there is only the occasional suggestion of
mortar-lines, the mind will fill in the rest), and give a little fill
lighting so that the inside is not so completely black.
But it is a really interesting construct, and well carried out. Nice.
-s
5TF!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Seasonal salutations to you all.
>
> Following on from my tentative trefoil knot last year, here is a more recent
> and complete version. It still lacks people, and may well be altered
> somewhat in the field of texturing, but it looks pretty damn dramatic I
> reckon.
>
> Who wants to guess how long it took to render?
>
> Bill
Wow! This and your tetrahedral planetoid posts indicate some fine abilities!
I hope you keep up with the surreal constructions.
This is looking very good, but to my eyes it is a little dark and hard to
make out. Of course this could just be monitor gamma differences. Maybe if
you lit it just a little brighter?
Are you going to have figures on both sides of the stairs, or just the...
umm.. "top"? :)
-Stefan
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell spake:
> Seasonal salutations to you all.
>
> Following on from my tentative trefoil knot last year, here is a more
> recent and complete version. It still lacks people, and may well be
> altered somewhat in the field of texturing, but it looks pretty damn
> dramatic I reckon.
>
> Who wants to guess how long it took to render?
>
> Bill
Erm... a week?
Looks pretty nice, by the way...
--
Stefan Viljoen
Software Support Technician / Programmer
Polar Design Solutions
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is fantastic! You've got to put a person (at least) on those central
cross-over sections to finish it (or, just to see what it looks like
anyway).
Very nice work so far.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Seasonal salutations to you all.
>
> Following on from my tentative trefoil knot last year, here is a more recent
> and complete version. It still lacks people, and may well be altered
> somewhat in the field of texturing, but it looks pretty damn dramatic I
> reckon.
>
> Who wants to guess how long it took to render?
>
> Bill
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Nice.
The railing introduces a focral elements, does it not, a direction, a
difinitive "up"? Not sure I like that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.43ba7abd7585287e731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> Who wants to guess how long it took to render?
.099 zillion hours? ;)
~Steve~
>
> Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:43bacdf6@news.povray.org...
> The railing introduces a focral elements, does it not, a direction, a
> difinitive "up"? Not sure I like that.
But isn't it 'up' and/or 'down' too Jim?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.43ba7abd7585287e731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> Seasonal salutations to you all.
>
> Following on from my tentative trefoil knot last year, here is a more
recent
> and complete version. It still lacks people, and may well be altered
> somewhat in the field of texturing, but it looks pretty damn dramatic I
> reckon.
>
> Who wants to guess how long it took to render?
>
> Bill
excellent! i really like the lighting, but I think the background could be
more interesting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very interesting. Like nightmare:)
Hasan.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
> news:43bacdf6@news.povray.org...
>
>> The railing introduces a focral elements, does it not, a direction, a
>> difinitive "up"? Not sure I like that.
>
>
> But isn't it 'up' and/or 'down' too Jim?
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
Good point! Great shades of relativity.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |