 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I try not to install software I don't need. So could someone give an honest
opinion as to whether these pictures are good enough to justify downloading a
viewer?
There seem to have been 3 conversations about JPEG2000 and nobody's yet said if
the pictures are any good! :)
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spam here> wrote in message
news:nn2n4094eg36ee7ig8jljv9r5bf71r3mcj@4ax.com...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:32:39 -0800, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom>
wrote:
>I try not to install software I don't need. So could someone give an honest
>opinion as to whether these pictures are good enough to justify downloading a
>viewer?
Honest? Dear me - that's impossible. How can one be honest about such
things?
And ...
Can you really expect honesty from these people after I have had to
deal with them?
There will even less chance of objectivity now.
>
>There seem to have been 3 conversations about JPEG2000 and nobody's yet said if
>the pictures are any good! :)
Well I like them - they are nothing special though. Merely experiments
with isosurfaces that I had to satisfy myself with and one involving a
Poser model slice up.
As for getting a viewer that supports it, of course I would suggest
yes - get one. But if you feel happier about not doing so because of
your software-installation policy, then go with what makes you happy.
No one's forcing you do get this facility - it's merely a "suggested
serving".
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Can you really expect honesty from these people after I have had to
> deal with them?
Well I'm talking to the ones who've actually bothered downloading the viewer, so
they're probably not biased against you ;)
> No one's forcing you do get this facility - it's merely a "suggested
> serving".
Absolutely, I appreciate the suggestion. I tend to only install stuff if I know
I want it for some purpose, so if I start finding more jp2 files I'm sure I'll
get something that can handle them.
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in news:404baa37$1@news.povray.org:
>> Can you really expect honesty from these people after I have had to
>> deal with them?
>
> Well I'm talking to the ones who've actually bothered downloading the
> viewer, so they're probably not biased against you ;)
>
The images are quite nice ;)
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Look guys, it took *zilch* time for Irfanview to load this image
once the file extension was associated with my newsreader (OE). I
really don't see the problem here. Try it for yourselves and see. You
just click the filename in the attachment of the post, hit "open it"
as per normal, and bingo, image.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:404ba363$1@news.povray.org...
> I try not to install software I don't need. So could someone give an
honest
> opinion as to whether these pictures are good enough to justify
downloading a
> viewer?
You don't use Irfanview?? I'm surprised Tek. See my other post.
>
> There seem to have been 3 conversations about JPEG2000 and nobody's
yet said if
> the pictures are any good! :)
I appreciate the work that goes into them.
~Steve~
>
> --
> Tek
> www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
> news:nn2n4094eg36ee7ig8jljv9r5bf71r3mcj@4ax.com...
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:58:23 +0000, St. wrote:
>
> Look guys, it took *zilch* time for Irfanview to load this image
> once the file extension was associated with my newsreader (OE). I
> really don't see the problem here. Try it for yourselves and see. You
> just click the filename in the attachment of the post, hit "open it"
> as per normal, and bingo, image.
>
> ~Steve~
Unless Irfanview is available for linux (Hint: It isn't) I *DO* see a
problem.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tyler Eaves" <tyl### [at] NOSPAMml1net> wrote in message
news:pan### [at] NOSPAMml1net...
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:58:23 +0000, St. wrote:
>
> >
> > Look guys, it took *zilch* time for Irfanview to load this image
> > once the file extension was associated with my newsreader (OE). I
> > really don't see the problem here. Try it for yourselves and see.
You
> > just click the filename in the attachment of the post, hit "open
it"
> > as per normal, and bingo, image.
> Unless Irfanview is available for linux (Hint: It isn't) I *DO* see
a
> problem.
Yes, I knew this when I posted. I'm addressing the 'many' IE users
here.
~Steve~
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:404bc6bc@news.povray.org...
> You don't use Irfanview?? I'm surprised Tek. See my other post.
Well, call me lazy, but I find scrolling the window in Outlook Express is easier
than using another piece of software to view images.
No seriously, call me lazy, everyone else does. :)
> I appreciate the work that goes into them.
heh, thank you for that considered and informative opinion. ;)
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I couldn't see it.
"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
news:nn2n4094eg36ee7ig8jljv9r5bf71r3mcj@4ax.com...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
