jel### [at] M-yahoocom news:4076f89a@news.povray.org

> Taking the liberty to link to Rune's site:
> 
> This is the logo (by the way, I really like it...): 
> http://runevision.com/misc/povraylogo/logodisplay/logo01b.gif
> 
> This is what I think you should be doing: 
> http://runevision.com/misc/povraylogo/logodisplay/logo01e.jpg

So in fact You are suggesting exacly oposite of Runs idea - to make more 
complex, not simpler iamge :)

I will do both thing then, to be precise:

A) real logo, as You can put on paper, label box using it, put on pencil, 
etc - very simple.

B) complex logo-base image i.e. for a poster, or splash screen on WWW page, 
somethig like 
http://runevision.com/misc/povraylogo/logodisplay/logo01e.jpg.
This logo would be even more complex (as You suggested - more 3D, and point 
above "i" and "j" made only from atoms, not from spheres).

Images posted in this treat are aimed ad "B" - logo-base-image.

Assuming that this is my goal (to make a splash screen / poster image with 
IFJ-logo-motive in it), You thing that this render is going in good 
direction +/- ?

Now Im going to cleanup code and parametrize all options, so then I can 
quickly adjust logo.

Thanks for all comments, this gaved me inspiration to continue work :)


-- 
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics

Post a reply to this message

run### [at] runevisioncom news:4076d9fb@news.povray.org

> Yes, but then it's not a logo, it's just some image with a logo in it
> amongst other things.

> Yes, but if you include that small-scale atom, then it's not a logo
> anymore IMHO. Logos don't have small details like that.

Ok. I think I dont explain it correctly what was my goal, sorry - this 
image is aimed to be logo-based-image (not a real Logo).

Like image for a poster, splash screen.  Assuming this is the goal, You 
think this image is any good for that purpose?

And for a WWW splash screen - also is it too complex?

> I still don't think it's a logo. It's more like an image which has
> the logo, plus some extra details in it. A real logo is more simple.
 
>> Hmm I quess I could also go back to oryginal conception, two balls
> That's my suggestion.

...and I will make real Logo (simple) as we discussed above, thanks :)


-- 
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics

Post a reply to this message

Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> So in fact You are suggesting exacly oposite of Runs
> idea - to make more complex, not simpler iamge :)

Hehe, you're right... Well, my main point was the importance of knowing
what is what. :)

> I will do both thing then, to be precise:
>
> A) real logo, as You can put on paper, label box
> using it, put on pencil, etc - very simple.
>
> B) complex logo-base image i.e. for a poster, or
> splash screen on WWW page

That's cool then. I think Jellby's suggestions were good. I still think
you should also take advantage of the features of the original logo, and
use the 3d effects to enhance them, rather than ignore them...

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
rune|vision:  http://runevision.com **updated Mar 9**
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message