|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
run### [at] runevision com news:4076d9fb@news.povray.org
> Yes, but then it's not a logo, it's just some image with a logo in it
> amongst other things.
> Yes, but if you include that small-scale atom, then it's not a logo
> anymore IMHO. Logos don't have small details like that.
Ok. I think I dont explain it correctly what was my goal, sorry - this
image is aimed to be logo-based-image (not a real Logo).
Like image for a poster, splash screen. Assuming this is the goal, You
think this image is any good for that purpose?
And for a WWW splash screen - also is it too complex?
> I still don't think it's a logo. It's more like an image which has
> the logo, plus some extra details in it. A real logo is more simple.
>> Hmm I quess I could also go back to oryginal conception, two balls
> That's my suggestion.
...and I will make real Logo (simple) as we discussed above, thanks :)
--
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |