POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : [ot] my work - 1 attachment Server Time
11 Aug 2024 21:21:58 EDT (-0400)
  [ot] my work - 1 attachment (Message 16 to 25 of 25)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: ABX
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 11:57:14
Message: <pmnk20l80po64rqfr21kkc2oimdkath86q@4ax.com>
On 11 Feb 2004 11:39:16 -0500, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256com> wrote:
> Sorry, please tell me witch of following attachments (in following posts 
> below this one) is viewable to You (1,2,... ?)

Rafal, this is not test group.
Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 11:58:34
Message: <402a5f3a$1@news.povray.org>
ABX wrote:

>>Yes, the image was _readable_, not viewable.
>>
>>You really have to configure your news client to make proper 
>>attachments. Or then I'll dump this Thunderbird I'm using...
> 
> 
> That image was fine for my Forte Agent and for news.povray.org
> http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/34631/

Then I take my words back and Thunderbird (v0.5) is to be blamed. I hope 
they'll fix the problem.

Severi


Post a reply to this message

From: Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 12:00:04
Message: <Xns948CB73E286DCraf256com@203.29.75.35>
abx### [at] abxartpl news:pmnk20l80po64rqfr21kkc2oimdkath86q@4ax.com

> Rafal, this is not test group.
> Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.

I used a realy small (10 lines) attachment, but ok - sorry.

(btw how about creating povray.test or povray.news-client.test group with 
expiration time of 3 days? if it isnt much work ofcourse, just an idea)

-- 
#macro g(U,V)(.4*abs(sin(9*sqrt(pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))))*pow(1-min(1,(sqrt(
pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))*.3)),2)+.9)#end#macro p(c)#if(c>1)#local l=mod(c,100
);g(2*div(l,10)-8,2*mod(l,10)-8)*p(div(c,100))#else 1#end#end light_source{
y 2}sphere{z*20 9pigment{function{p(26252423)*p(36455644)*p(66656463)}}}//M


Post a reply to this message

From: Jeremy M  Praay
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 13:18:17
Message: <402a71e9$1@news.povray.org>
Someone searching for the proper way to post attachments in these newsgroups
may come across this brief discussion.  If it was posted in off-topic,
people may be more repeat the same mistakes of the past.

He kept the attachments very small.  Personally, I don't see the problem,
any more than someone posting "Thanks" to someone else's "Nice Image!".

Just my 2 cents.

-- 
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com


"ABX" <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote in message
news:pmnk20l80po64rqfr21kkc2oimdkath86q@4ax.com...
> On 11 Feb 2004 11:39:16 -0500, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256com>
wrote:
> > Sorry, please tell me witch of following attachments (in following posts
> > below this one) is viewable to You (1,2,... ?)
>
> Rafal, this is not test group.
> Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.
>
> ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: ABX
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 13:52:28
Message: <33uk20lfkfj2l1lmvd9ee87kmarj4e1ql1@4ax.com>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:18:17 -0500, "Jeremy M. Praay"
<jer### [at] questsoftwarecom> wrote:
> Someone searching for the proper way to post attachments in these newsgroups
> may come across this brief discussion.  If it was posted in off-topic,
> people may be more repeat the same mistakes of the past.
>
> He kept the attachments very small.  Personally, I don't see the problem,
> any more than someone posting "Thanks" to someone else's "Nice Image!".

I completly agree with you about the way Rafal did it. The reason behind my
note was that readers learn bad habits by seeing wrong examples. If wrong
example has no note that it was indeed wrong than by repeating it becames
(still wrong) rule. Not every newbie realizes difference in bandwith between
small image and large image, between one post and four posts. Now, with four
answers, we used probably more space than Rafal did, but if it could stop some
person in the future to use that server/group for testing attachemnts with
100kB image then it was success :-)

ABX


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 15:02:29
Message: <402a8a55$1@news.povray.org>
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> Sorry, please tell me witch of following attachments (in following posts 
> below this one) is viewable to You (1,2,... ?)

Generally speaking, most news and mail agents can handle either a MIME 
attachment, or a uuencoded file *with no MIME headers*. Mail readers 
that see MIME headers saying "there's no attachment, this is just plain 
text" with a bunch of uuencode in the body will generally show the 
encoded text rather than decoding it.

If your posting software insists on putting in MIME headers, you should 
use MIME-standard posting mechanisms.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA USA (PST)
   I am in geocentric orbit, supported by
   a quantum photon exchange drive....


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Naylor
Subject: Re: test 1, [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 17:30:24
Message: <402aad00$1@news.povray.org>
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:

>yEnc encode, 8bit, mime 1.0
>  
>
I use Mozilla, this shows no attachment at all
Bill


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Naylor
Subject: Re: test 1, [ot] my work - 1 attachment - File 1 of 1 - yEnc "pov.jpg" 497 bytes (1/1)
Date: 11 Feb 2004 17:31:05
Message: <402aad29@news.povray.org>
I use Mozilla, this one shows text.
Bill


Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:

>=ybegin line=128 size=497 name=pov.jpg
>))=J*:tpsp*++**+*+**)*m*0=n/0/=n00/011024:44334>896:A>BBA>@@DGOIDEMF@@JVJMPQSTSCIWZWRZORSR)*m+111424=}44=}RD@DRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR



>)
>=yend size=497 crc32=8965025b
>  
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill Naylor
Subject: Re: test 2, [ot] my work - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 17:31:56
Message: <402aad5c$1@news.povray.org>
I use Mozilla, this one showed the image.
Bill

Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:

>MIME encode, 8bit, mime 1.0
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: [ot] my work - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 17:52:11
Message: <402AB1DB.7020506@hotmail.com>
I recently posted a work-around for those UU-encoded
attachments that Rafal is using in the
'A-114 Grid Media - 1 attachment' tread in pbs-f.
basically:
save file as *.uue (perhaps remove an extra .eml
extension later)
now you can read the file in e.g. winzip.

If you use some other zip (e.g. uudecode) util then
you may also have to delete all lines before the
line that begins with:
'begin 644 ....'

I came across this problem before and for me it is
a sign that the mailer is using a Mac.

It may be better if Rafal would use something that
is useable for other people also
	Andrel


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.