|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ingo <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message
news:8EF7D872Cseed7@204.213.191.228...
> Inspired by Ken mentioning a pigment where the brick could be turbulated.
>
>
> Ingo
>
>
hey pretty neet. reminds me of the inside of some public schools.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ingo" <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message
news:8EF7D872Cseed7@204.213.191.228...
> Inspired by Ken mentioning a pigment where the brick could be turbulated.
>
I went and measured some bricks and a ceiling tile and canceled my
previous message. Something does look out of scale though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill DeWitt wrote:
>.... Something does look out of scale though.
:) You're right.
I, intentionally, made the structure of the stucco a bit to big. In Dutch I
would say "het wringt". Don't know the English idiom good enough, maybe
something like "it pinches"? Like a shoe that fits, but only for half an
hour. After that it isn't too small, but not comfortable any more.
As for the proportion of the bricks, it's different per country. When I
cross the bored to Germany, only a few Km, the face of a house looks
different only because they use a different brick size.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey this is great! Now for some water marks and it would be finished
"ingo" <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message
news:8EF7D872Cseed7@204.213.191.228...
> Inspired by Ken mentioning a pigment where the brick could be turbulated.
>
>
> Ingo
>
> --
> Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
> Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To me it looks like the depth between bricks and cement.
Otherwise I like it.
Peter
ingo wrote:
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
> >.... Something does look out of scale though.
>
> :) You're right.
> I, intentionally, made the structure of the stucco a bit to big. In Dutch I
> would say "het wringt". Don't know the English idiom good enough, maybe
> something like "it pinches"? Like a shoe that fits, but only for half an
> hour. After that it isn't too small, but not comfortable any more.
>
> As for the proportion of the bricks, it's different per country. When I
> cross the bored to Germany, only a few Km, the face of a house looks
> different only because they use a different brick size.
>
> Ingo
>
> --
> Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
> Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Enig wrote:
>To me it looks like the depth between bricks and cement.
>
That's a part I'm still working on.
My house is build in the early thirties and has a "knip-voeg" (Dutch).
It's a joint where the mortar stands out above the brick and
_
has a / \ shape. There are lots of other types of joints. When combined in
the right way on a big wall, great effects can be created. It's a pitty
these techniques are seldom used by modern architects.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like! Is the cement a hf? If you had a similar isosurface or something
covering the whole wall you could make very realistic mortar I think.
sig.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sigmund Kyrre Aas wrote:
>I like! Is the cement a hf?
Thanks. Bricks & cement is one HF and cement & stucco is one HF. I'll post
the source in p.t.s-f.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ingo" <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message
news:8EF890C04seed7@204.213.191.228...
> It's a joint where the mortar stands out above the brick and
> _
> has a / \ shape. There are lots of other types of joints. When combined in
> the right way on a big wall, great effects can be created. It's a pitty
> these techniques are seldom used by modern architects.
The problem is to find clients willing to pay for pure aesthetic (very rare
these days) AND mason(s) qualified enough to do this correctly (it is hard
enough to find a mason capable of doing correctly the most simple standart
joint).
*sigh*
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yep, couldn't agree more. Where I come from it's even worse..brick
buildings are still being made, but the result always seems to be the
standars shoebox-design with something on top and no
attension to details. too bad.
Peter
Philippe Debar wrote:
> "ingo" <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message
> news:8EF890C04seed7@204.213.191.228...
> > It's a joint where the mortar stands out above the brick and
> > _
> > has a / \ shape. There are lots of other types of joints. When combined in
> > the right way on a big wall, great effects can be created. It's a pitty
> > these techniques are seldom used by modern architects.
>
> The problem is to find clients willing to pay for pure aesthetic (very rare
> these days) AND mason(s) qualified enough to do this correctly (it is hard
> enough to find a mason capable of doing correctly the most simple standart
> joint).
>
> *sigh*
>
> Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |