POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : LanuHum Global Test image Server Time
30 Jul 2024 16:25:25 EDT (-0400)
  LanuHum Global Test image (Message 27 to 36 of 126)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 03:50:01
Message: <web.52ce625a20fca3a57a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:

>
> Not exactly: should be srgbf or srgbt as there are *four* parameters in
> the vector ;-)
>
> Thomas

Therefore I asked. Means, s - isn't adjustable parameter


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 03:59:12
Message: <52ce64e0$1@news.povray.org>
On 9-1-2014 9:48, LanuHum wrote:
> Therefore I asked. Means, s - isn't adjustable parameter

no indeed. It is /not/ adjustable.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 04:10:01
Message: <web.52ce66d220fca3a57a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 08.01.2014 15:25, schrieb clipka:
>
> > Here's my first result after getting the worst stuff sorted out (using
> > UberPOV of course).
>
> Further down the line, UberPOV gives me this.
>
> Which reminds me that I still have to make blurred reflections work
> properly with photons.

clipka, may I place your work on i.imgur.com?
I want that the picture was visible on the page our site.
While I placed the link


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 05:13:14
Message: <52ce763a@news.povray.org>
Am 09.01.2014 09:41, schrieb LanuHum:

> clipka, I noticed that in your work light on a floor in the room differs from
> light on a floor in a mirror. It is correct?

I'm perfectly sure there is no such difference. It does differ from your 
results, but that's because I adjusted the light source position to 
better match the images produced with other renderers.


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 05:15:10
Message: <52ce76ae@news.povray.org>
Am 09.01.2014 09:02, schrieb LanuHum:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>> Am 08.01.2014 15:25, schrieb clipka:
>>
>>> Here's my first result after getting the worst stuff sorted out (using
>>> UberPOV of course).
>>
>> Further down the line, UberPOV gives me this.
>>
>> Which reminds me that I still have to make blurred reflections work
>> properly with photons.
>
> What is the time left on a render?

This particular render took about 2.5 hours.


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 05:16:04
Message: <52ce76e4$1@news.povray.org>
Am 09.01.2014 10:07, schrieb LanuHum:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>> Am 08.01.2014 15:25, schrieb clipka:
>>
>>> Here's my first result after getting the worst stuff sorted out (using
>>> UberPOV of course).
>>
>> Further down the line, UberPOV gives me this.
>>
>> Which reminds me that I still have to make blurred reflections work
>> properly with photons.
>
> clipka, may I place your work on i.imgur.com?

You're welcome to do so.

> I want that the picture was visible on the page our site.
> While I placed the link

I don't understand what you're trying to say here.


Post a reply to this message

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 05:40:00
Message: <web.52ce7c6820fca3a57a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
> > I want that the picture was visible on the page our site.
> > While I placed the link
>
> I don't understand what you're trying to say here.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'toclipka.jpeg.jpg' (61 KB)

Preview of image 'toclipka.jpeg.jpg'
toclipka.jpeg.jpg


 

From: LanuHum
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 05:55:00
Message: <web.52ce7eca20fca3a57a3e03fe0@news.povray.org>
clipka, I asked for permission download you picture and paste it in imgur.com

Other question.
On the picture of uber, lux and my vase. It is possible to adjust it in the
official version Povray?


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download '3vases.png' (49 KB)

Preview of image '3vases.png'
3vases.png


 

From: clipka
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 07:20:22
Message: <52ce9406$1@news.povray.org>
Am 09.01.2014 11:39, schrieb LanuHum:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>>
>>> I want that the picture was visible on the page our site.
>>> While I placed the link
>>
>> I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
>

If I understand you correctly, you're saying that the image must be 
uploaded to i.umgur.com to be visible directly on that page.

I actually don't care whether that's necessary or not - if you intend to 
show it or otherwise reference it on that page, I'd like you to 
reference a copy located on some server related to that page anyway. 
Referencing the copy stored on the povray news server comes with the 
risk that some day the link might end up dead.

So yes, you do have my kind permission to upload the image to 
i.imgur.com for this purpose.


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: LanuHum Global Test image
Date: 9 Jan 2014 07:25:24
Message: <52ce9534$1@news.povray.org>
Am 09.01.2014 11:49, schrieb LanuHum:
> clipka, I asked for permission download you picture and paste it in imgur.com
>
> Other question.
> On the picture of uber, lux and my vase. It is possible to adjust it in the
> official version Povray?

Certainly.

I'm using the following statements for the vases:


#declare brown_shapes_finish = finish {
     specular 0.653
     roughness 0.01
     diffuse  0.815
     conserve_energy
     reflection {
         <1,1,1> * 0.6
         fresnel on
     }
}
...
#declare brown_shapes_tex =
texture {pigment {color srgbf <0.3959,0.1713,0.1713,1.0>} 
finish{brown_shapes_finish}}
...
#include "vase1_object.inc"
object {vase1_ob interior { ior 1.5 }}
...
#include "vase2_object.inc"
object {vase2_ob interior { ior 1.5 }}


BTW, I'm using the following light source, which seems to be much closer 
to the original light setup:

light_source {
     <-7.1,10,-5.16>*10000
     color srgb<1, 1, 1> * 2
     area_light x*1000,y*1000,17,17 adaptive 1 circular orient jitter
     photons { refraction on reflection on }
}


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.