 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 14-7-2013 14:07, Stephen wrote:
> On 14/07/2013 12:03 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
>>
>> I need to model a backpack now...
>>
>>
>> All the more reasons for me to get a grip on Blender. :-)
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>
> Goes together. I suppose that you are going to use Poser's cloth room.
>
Possibly. Not sure yet if I make it purely a prop or if I combine that
with the cloth room for the straps.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> On 14-7-2013 14:07, Stephen wrote:
> > On 14/07/2013 12:03 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I need to model a backpack now...
> >>
> >>
> >> All the more reasons for me to get a grip on Blender. :-)
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >
> > Goes together. I suppose that you are going to use Poser's cloth room.
> >
> Possibly. Not sure yet if I make it purely a prop or if I combine that
> with the cloth room for the straps.
>
> Thomas
see the backpack as being of the smaller type and either frame less or having an
internal frame.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15-7-2013 13:24, Stephen wrote:
> see the backpack as being of the smaller type and either frame less or having an
> internal frame.
Frame-less (or internal indeed). Something like the image. I have used
all sorts of packs, from one-strap canvas side-packs to the old
onion-shaped backpacks, and even thin nylon flimsy packs, not to mention
supermarket carrier bags ;-) It really depends on the project under way.
My preference is for the one shown on the image.
As far as Poser is concerned, the body can be as rigid as necessary
while only the straps need Cloth Room modelling to settle the whole
thing on the back of the figure, or that is how I imagine things presently.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fjallraven-20l-backpack.jpg' (146 KB)
Preview of image 'fjallraven-20l-backpack.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 15-7-2013 13:24, Stephen wrote:
> > see the backpack as being of the smaller type and either frame less or having an
> > internal frame.
>
> Frame-less (or internal indeed). Something like the image. I have used
> all sorts of packs, from one-strap canvas side-packs to the old
> onion-shaped backpacks, and even thin nylon flimsy packs, not to mention
> supermarket carrier bags ;-) It really depends on the project under way.
> My preference is for the one shown on the image.
>
Yes, your preference would be easier to model. My romantic image is of an onion
type with or without a bullwhip. ;-)
> As far as Poser is concerned, the body can be as rigid as necessary
> while only the straps need Cloth Room modelling to settle the whole
> thing on the back of the figure, or that is how I imagine things presently.
>
Very important IMO, not to have the straps looking as if they are made of wood.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16-7-2013 16:13, Stephen wrote:
> Yes, your preference would be easier to model. My romantic image is of an onion
> type with or without a bullwhip. ;-)
<grin> Those were hell to carry. Pulling you shoulder out of joint.
> Very important IMO, not to have the straps looking as if they are made of wood.
Absolutely.
Quick & Dirty: a first /portrait/ of my hammer.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology6.png' (270 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology6.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 16-7-2013 16:13, Stephen wrote:
> > Yes, your preference would be easier to model. My romantic image is of an onion
> > type with or without a bullwhip. ;-)
>
> <grin> Those were hell to carry. Pulling you shoulder out of joint.
>
>
> > Very important IMO, not to have the straps looking as if they are made of wood.
>
> Absolutely.
>
>
> Quick & Dirty: a first /portrait/ of my hammer.
>
>
> Thomas
Even this one is nice. The picture is a little bit small to really judge it. I
think the rust stains are a little bit to sharp. And for the backpack in the
original scene, why bother about the straps? The guy is only seen from behind.
If you will not reuse him with other pictures just put the backpack believable
at his back and forget about the cloth room.
Best regards,
Michael
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 13-7-2013 22:18, Samuel Benge wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> I am not going much places anymore these days...
> >
> > That's a shame! You've got to get out there sometime :)
>
> Oh well. I have done my lot of travelling over the world. Nowadays I am
> just content to watch other people going places. ;-)
No need to do much traveling, unless you live in a city. Seeing things firsthand
can produce fresh inspiration above and beyond that which is produced by merely
looking at images. The complexity of the natural world never ceases to amaze me.
> > That reminds me, just this week I was playing with Blender's smoke simulation. I
> > have now managed to get smoke from Blender to actually render in POV-Ray. <snip>
>
> All the more reasons for me to get a grip on Blender. :-)
Ain't nothing to it but to do it (c:
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16-7-2013 20:53, MichaelJF wrote:
> Even this one is nice. The picture is a little bit small to really judge it. I
> think the rust stains are a little bit to sharp.
Thanks Michael. There is more work to do on the model indeed as this is
just an in-between render just for showing progress.
> And for the backpack in the
> original scene, why bother about the straps? The guy is only seen from behind.
> If you will not reuse him with other pictures just put the backpack believable
> at his back and forget about the cloth room.
>
Yes, that might be a good idea indeed. I like to make complete models
but in this case I just might get away with your suggestion. I have no
immediate use of a backpack at this moment ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-7-2013 2:24, Samuel Benge wrote:
> No need to do much traveling, unless you live in a city. Seeing things firsthand
> can produce fresh inspiration above and beyond that which is produced by merely
> looking at images. The complexity of the natural world never ceases to amaze me.
Oh yes! I absolutely agree. I live in the country, with a mixed
landscape of cultivation, woods, and moors. I do a lot of bicycling
around, often with camera, at all times of the year. Having worked on
the geology in this area, I like to peel off the different layers in my
mind and reconstruct former worlds around me :-) Even in a 'flat'
country like NL, the geological past can be quite complex in some
places. No much use of a hammer though, hence the rust. ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 13/07/2013 14.13 wrote:
> Next, with the hammer and some flying dust.
>
> Thomas
A very neat image!
Perhaps needs some crow watching at the scene?
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
