POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Matinee #2 Server Time
30 Jul 2024 22:15:34 EDT (-0400)
  Matinee #2 (Message 11 to 14 of 14)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: clipka
Subject: Re: Matinee #2
Date: 18 Mar 2011 15:42:53
Message: <4d83b5bd$1@news.povray.org>
Am 18.03.2011 19:34, schrieb Ive:

> Thanks. What about the brightness? As sayd in my response to Robert this
> *is* one of the aspects I'm quite unsure.

I guess this isn't something I'll be saying often, but: Maybe try some 
gamma tweaking to increase the brightness contrast between lights and 
shadows.

Perception of relative brightness levels changes with ambient viewing 
conditions; those in a movie theater are quite extreme (the eye 
typically adapting to the bright light of the screen, causing shadows to 
appear even darker), so some deal of gamma adjustment seems justified to 
me in this case.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ive
Subject: Re: Matinee #2
Date: 18 Mar 2011 16:47:40
Message: <4d83c4ec@news.povray.org>
Am 18.03.2011 20:03, schrieb Trevor G Quayle:

> If you want to brighten it, make sure you do it while maintain the feel.  The
> main lighting on the character will be coming from the screen, so it should
> mainly come from that direction, preferably as an area light (this is why for my
> scene I created an image based, area light area, to simulate the actual screen
> reflected light).  You may have some secondary lighting coming from the theatre
> lights (ceilings and walls), but generally these would be low enough that the
> have no noticeable effect on the scene as a whole, but only localized bright
> spots at their locations.

Actually I'm using just 2 light sources: the projector lamp itself (with 
some really high intensity: rgb 125000) and a quite dim one within the 
projector cabin.
The scene illumination relies completely on GI and comes almost 
completely (there might be some minor radiosity-media interaction from 
the light-beam with the 'dust') from the screen where I did *not* use an 
image_map but instead the light from the projector is projected_through 
a small image with filter value set to 1 and located within the 
projector - kinda like the real thing.
The only *fake* is the skin of the kid that has its own light_group with 
a few reddish colored lights (kinda SSLT fake) to get a skin tone that 
does not look too natural but also does not look like plastic - to make 
it work with his cartoonish style.
But this is not so much *fake* at all because I'm pretty sure when such 
a shot is done for a *real* movie they would at additional spots and 
reflectors - lots of them ;)


> One other source of light would be from the projector beam (this is the next
> light I am going to add to my scene when I get back to it): the dust in the air
> would tend to scatter it a little.  This would be minor compared to the screen
> lighting, but could still have some general ambient effects on the scene, for
> example some possible minor lighting around the projector window, and minor
> directional area lighting on the chracter and seats.  I would probably keep this
> to 10% or less of the screen relative brightness, as you don't want it to
> overpower and be directly noticeable and competing with the main lighting, but
> just add subtle ambience and complement the main lighting.
>

Well, perhaps this volume light from the "dust in the air" is quite a 

still used because it simply helps in making this movie theater flair?
Yesterday I did see "Unknown Identity" in the theater and did actually 
watch out for the beam - but it was too faint to be visible.


> Overall good work.  Nice to see another POVer getting involved in th 'big boy'
> challenges to show em what we can do!

Hum, well, hopefully we do not make our favorite render engine look too 
bad among all this Maya, Mudbox and what not 'big boys' tools...


-Ive


Post a reply to this message

From: Ive
Subject: Re: Matinee #2
Date: 18 Mar 2011 17:07:28
Message: <4d83c990@news.povray.org>
Am 18.03.2011 20:26, schrieb clipka:
> Am 18.03.2011 13:05, schrieb Ive:
>
>> Criticism quite welcome - before I hit the run button for the final
>> render!
>
> Projector looks very realistic to me - unfortunately that generates a
> stark contrast to the cartoon-esque character.
>
> I'd personally prefer more "comfy" seat textile (if you know what I
> mean), though I'm not sure how to achieve that look.

And I do prefer more 'comfy' seats in the theater ;)  ...but I think 
this kind of cushion works well with the orange color that I do need for 
the 70ies flashback.

-Ive


Post a reply to this message

From: Robert McGregor
Subject: Re: Matinee #2
Date: 22 Mar 2011 23:20:01
Message: <web.4d8966914b0f308494d713cc0@news.povray.org>
Ive <ive### [at] lilysoftorg> wrote:
> Hum, well, hopefully we do not make our favorite render engine look too
> bad among all this Maya, Mudbox and what not 'big boys' tools...
>
>
> -Ive

I just looked through all the WIP renders in the challenge forum and your WIP
from last week with the full 1970s theater, ceiling lights with media, and
projected credits on-screen jumped right out at me as being a cut above; really
nice work! And the POV-Ray 3.7 RC3 blurb, nice!

-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.