 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 20/02/2011 9:27 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Have you tried putting your models in a scene? I'd be interested in the
>> results.
>
> I guess the new parameterization will really make it a lot easier: It'll
> boil down to first picking a suitable pigment, and then just toying
> around with a single translucency parameter until it looks convincing.
Better and better :-D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"clipka" <ano### [at] anonymous org> schreef in bericht
news:4d618629$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Heh - thank /you/ people for encouraging me to pick up that work again :-)
Hail to the Chief! Great work indeed.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 20/02/2011 8:16 PM, Robert McGregor wrote:
> > Here are a couple of 10cm-long test rhinos, on left with no SSLT, on right
> > with SSLT base texture and layered texture with pigment at filter 0.6
> > (trying to match a reference photo), no radiosity. Not too bad I guess...
>
> Not too bad at all, at all. I've not thought of layering over SSLT.
Here's what I was using - curious to see what this looks like on your lamp:
// SSLT Units
#declare SSLT_UNIT_CM = 10;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_M = 10 * 100;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_IN = 10 * 2.54;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_FT = 10 * 2.54 * 12;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_YD = 10 * 2.54 * 12 * 3;
#declare SSLT_Samples = <16, 8>*8;
global_settings {
assumed_gamma 1
mm_per_unit SSLT_UNIT_CM*10
subsurface { samples SSLT_Samples.x, SSLT_Samples.y }
}
#include "rhino.inc" // the model is 1 POV-unit long
object { Rhino
texture {
pigment { rgb 1 transmit 0.1 }
finish {
// ivory?
subsurface { <0.70, 0.72, 0.57>, <0.000314, 0.00049, 0.00067> }
}
}
texture {
pigment { srgb<235,220,190>/255 filter 0.6 }
normal { agate 0.1 scale 0.15 }
finish {
specular 0.7 roughness 0.01
reflection { 0.05, 0.95 fresnel } conserve_energy
}
}
interior { ior 1.54 }
}
Cheers,
Rob
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/02/2011 1:29 PM, Robert McGregor wrote:
> Here's what I was using - curious to see what this looks like on your lamp:
I'll post a comparison when your material has finished rendering. From
what I can see your texture looks much better. Mine finished in 10
minutes and after 20 minutes yours is 18% finished.
I think it needs higher subsurface { samples }
In the meantime I posted the DFX mesh in povray.binaries.misc in the
thread Lamp with SSLT Figure, if you want to try it. (3 Megs)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 20.02.2011 18:35, schrieb clipka:
> Please don't get too excited yet though: The changes will not make it
> into 3.7.0; I expect to rush out a patch though as soon as a 3.7.0
> version is released with a non-beta license.
It's coming, it's coming! Dev team colleagues did agree to include it
even in the next 3.7.0 release candidate!
(jumps up & down in excitement)
I can't wait to see what you guys will make of it...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/02/2011 8:37 PM, clipka wrote:
> It's coming, it's coming! Dev team colleagues did agree to include it
> even in the next 3.7.0 release candidate!
>
Good news and well done :-D
> (jumps up & down in excitement)
>
> I can't wait to see what you guys will make of it...
With your artistic talent you shouldn't need to wait. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/02/2011 6:48 PM, Stephen wrote:
> I'll post a comparison when your material has finished rendering. From
> what I can see your texture looks much better. Mine finished in 10
> minutes and after 20 minutes yours is 18% finished.
I don't know what order these images will be posted but yours is the
lighter one. I think that for this model the agate pattern is
superfluous. But more discussion might be wasted with Clipa's news.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'v4lamp01a_inc00b_.jpg' (42 KB)
Download 'v4lamp01a_inc00brobs_.jpg' (40 KB)
Preview of image 'v4lamp01a_inc00b_.jpg'
Preview of image 'v4lamp01a_inc00brobs_.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 20.02.2011 18:35, schrieb clipka:
>
> > Please don't get too excited yet though: The changes will not make it
> > into 3.7.0; I expect to rush out a patch though as soon as a 3.7.0
> > version is released with a non-beta license.
>
> It's coming, it's coming! Dev team colleagues did agree to include it
> even in the next 3.7.0 release candidate!
>
> (jumps up & down in excitement)
>
> I can't wait to see what you guys will make of it...
Awesome! I'm really looking forward to it :)
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 21/02/2011 6:48 PM, Stephen wrote:
> I don't know what order these images will be posted but yours is the
> lighter one. I think that for this model the agate pattern is
> superfluous. But more discussion might be wasted with Clipa's news.
Just curious, how many POV-units is the model in your scene? After I rotated
VickiLamp and ran her through PoseRay it shows:
size dx,dy,dz=(0.192059,0.631494,0.42944)
So I just used scale 1.59 to make her 1 POV-unit tall. Assuming she's about a
foot tall as a lamp I changed my mm_per_unit to SSLT_UNIT_FT and got this result
after 13 min. (using the same samples of <16, 8>*8). The SSLT is subtle but
really makes a big difference when comparing left to right.
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sslt_vickilamp.png' (737 KB)
Preview of image 'sslt_vickilamp.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22/02/2011 4:22 AM, Robert McGregor wrote:
> Just curious, how many POV-units is the model in your scene? After I rotated
> VickiLamp and ran her through PoseRay it shows:
>
> size dx,dy,dz=(0.192059,0.631494,0.42944)
>
Good question, I make it 16.5, after scaling. But I said to my self if
it were standing straight it would be about 20 and the height 10 inches.
This gives mm_per_unit = 12.7 but for some reason I've been using
mm_per_unit 74.86
> So I just used scale 1.59 to make her 1 POV-unit tall. Assuming she's about a
> foot tall as a lamp I changed my mm_per_unit to SSLT_UNIT_FT and got this result
> after 13 min. (using the same samples of<16, 8>*8).
It took me about 40 mins to render her with your material 10 mins with mine.
Width = 800
Height = 600
Antialias = On
Sampling_Method = 1
Antialias_Threshold = 0.300
Jitter = Off
Antialias_Depth = 3
> The SSLT is subtle but
> really makes a big difference when comparing left to right.
It does indeed. :-D
I'm playing with the Stanford Bunny ATM.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
