 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] u washingtonedu> wrote:
>
> :\ I'm so out of my league in this forum. (Yeah, I imagined a number once...)
>
Well, truthfully recognizing a function like that is a bit more like
doing well in a mathematical version of Trivial Pursuit; fun, but not to
be confused with actually knowing anything deep about the topic at hand
(at least in my case).
Also, I like the pun.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
> >
> > :\ I'm so out of my league in this forum. (Yeah, I imagined a number once...)
> >
Yeah, I'm with you. I've been keeping Wolfram's open in another tab while
reading this thread. There's so much to learn and so little time...
--
Sam Bleckley
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
triple_r wrote:
> Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, not sure, maybe the absolute value of the Riemann zeta function?
>
> Correct!
I was going to suggest it because it looked familiar, but then I
looked at the image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
and decided that perhaps it's not that after all. The ridges looked too
evenly shaped.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> triple_r wrote:
>> Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, not sure, maybe the absolute value of the Riemann zeta function?
>> Correct!
>
> I was going to suggest it because it looked familiar, but then I
> looked at the image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
> and decided that perhaps it's not that after all. The ridges looked too
> evenly shaped.
I imagine that this image is from the x >= 0 half plane, and since the
structure that's most obvious in the wikipedia article is for x < 0 it's
reasonable that this image would look different. But yeah, I get your
point, that very same issue is why I was pretty unsure if my guess was
correct.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>
> I was going to suggest it because it looked familiar, but then I
> looked at the image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
> and decided that perhaps it's not that after all. The ridges looked too
> evenly shaped.
Yes, the real part is from 0 to 2, and the imaginary part from about 20 to 50.
Oh, and sorry for hijacking your thread--I enjoyed your quiz enough to try and
return the favor though.
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ramdom matrix?
I see a binary 2D matrix, checked in black squares to 0 allways and white
squares distributed randomly beetween 0 or 1.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"triple_r" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > What is this? Only two-word answers are accepted.
>
> Quick variation if I'm right, completely random if I'm wrong...
>
> - Ricky
Ricky, I liked your variation so much that I made a quick variation of it...
- Rob
"There is no spoon."
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rwmsackssprialguys.jpg' (215 KB)
Preview of image 'rwmsackssprialguys.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
> Ricky, I liked your variation so much that I made a quick variation of it...
Rob -
And I liked your variation on my variation so much that I made a quick variation
of it. One factor to unite them all...
- Ricky
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'prime2.jpg' (148 KB)
Preview of image 'prime2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Rob -
>
> And I liked your variation on my variation so much that I made a quick variation
> of it. One factor to unite them all...
>
> - Ricky
Haha! This is a "prime" example of how religious zealotry can "spiral" out of
control around "one" small thing, even the smallest of factors... Bravo!
"There is no spoon."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"triple_r" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
> > Ricky, I liked your variation so much that I made a quick variation of it...
>
> Rob -
>
> And I liked your variation on my variation so much that I made a quick variation
> of it. One factor to unite them all...
>
> - Ricky
Completely random, but this image reminded me of a very similar image I once
rendered. Mine has none of the psuedo-order of primes in it, though.
-smws
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'figuretest.png' (205 KB)
Preview of image 'figuretest.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
