triple_r wrote:
> Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
> 
>> Hmmm, not sure, maybe the absolute value of the Riemann zeta function?
> 
> Correct!

  I was going to suggest it because it looked familiar, but then I
looked at the image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
and decided that perhaps it's not that after all. The ridges looked too
evenly shaped.

Post a reply to this message