Warp wrote:
> triple_r wrote:
>> Kevin Wampler <wampler+pov### [at] uwashingtonedu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, not sure, maybe the absolute value of the Riemann zeta function?
>> Correct!
> 
>   I was going to suggest it because it looked familiar, but then I
> looked at the image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function
> and decided that perhaps it's not that after all. The ridges looked too
> evenly shaped.

I imagine that this image is from the x >= 0 half plane, and since the 
structure that's most obvious in the wikipedia article is for x < 0 it's 
  reasonable that this image would look different.  But yeah, I get your 
point, that very same issue is why I was pretty unsure if my guess was 
correct.

Post a reply to this message