St. wrote:
> Yellow and rose gold. It's the cross in my 'Before and After' image...
> 
>    ~Steve~

Hi Steve,

Whew, I thought Thunderbird would never let me reply! That's a very nice 
design, Steve. Those diamonds are also awesome. I'm guessing the leaves 
and berries are a height_field? Of course, after seeing the earrings, 
I'm not so sure.

One critique about the gold texture: the reflections need to be more 
contrasty, IMO. May I suggest no ambient, high brilliance (probably 
already has that) and high reflection (more than 0.5)?

Are you able to make designs of this kind in real life? I know you're a 
jeweler, that's why I ask :) It would be *very* cool to make my own 
jewelry (especially since we can find our own gold up here in the Gold 
Country!).

Nice work! Those earrings are a perfect match for the cross.

~Sam

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> Yellow and rose gold. It's the cross in my 'Before and After' image...
>
>    ~Steve~

Beautiful work Steve! Can I have a pair of the earrings please?

Post a reply to this message

"Samuel Benge" <stb### [at] THIShotmailcom> wrote in message 
news:4697c9ec@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> Yellow and rose gold. It's the cross in my 'Before and After' image...
>>
>>    ~Steve~
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Whew, I thought Thunderbird would never let me reply! That's a very nice 
> design, Steve. Those diamonds are also awesome.


  Heh, thanks Sam. I think I struck lucky with the diamonds. ;) Not so sure 
about them in the next image though.



I'm guessing the leaves
> and berries are a height_field? Of course, after seeing the earrings, I'm 
> not so sure.

  You would be right to be doubtful, they're all Wings models.


>
> One critique about the gold texture: the reflections need to be more 
> contrasty, IMO. May I suggest no ambient, high brilliance (probably 
> already has that) and high reflection (more than 0.5)?

    Hmm, I didn't have brilliance in the statement with those first two 
images, but I've tried it in the next image. Here's what I've used:

    T_Gold_2A
     finish{
      diffuse 0.3
      ambient 0.0
      specular 0.6
      brilliance .5
      phong .5
      reflection .5
      conserve_energy}}

   I'm not sure if it has made a difference or not, but what else could I 
change or add?




>
> Are you able to make designs of this kind in real life? I know you're a 
> jeweler, that's why I ask :)

    Well, I hope I can make them! :) These might be going in a catalogue 
soon. (I'd made the mistake of showing the bossman one of my printed 
renders, and he thinks it's a photograph, so he wants me to design something 
for the catalogue). I designed the earrings about two years ago, and the 
cross and brooch are new designs. The idea is to have sprinklings of 
diamonds on the new designs. Yes, I can make them.  :o)



It would be *very* cool to make my own
> jewelry

 All you need is a 3' x 2' bench in a 6' space, some hand tools, propane, 
and you're away.

(especially since we can find our own gold up here in the Gold
> Country!).

   Lucky you! Send some my way!  :o)

>
> Nice work! Those earrings are a perfect match for the cross.

     Thank you.

     ~Steve~


>
> ~Sam

Post a reply to this message

Now with a brooch, or, as some of you might call it, a pin. With this image 
I cranked it up and used +a0.0 +am2, and it took 6.5 hours! The first two 
images took just 30 mins. each with standard AA.


   ~Steve~

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'earrings_cross_brooch.jpg' (494 KB)

Preview of image 'earrings_cross_brooch.jpg'

"Janet" <par### [at] attnet> wrote in message 
news:web.4699bede3249039d82b5a4480@news.povray.org...
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>> Yellow and rose gold. It's the cross in my 'Before and After' image...
>>
>>    ~Steve~
>
> Beautiful work Steve!

  Thank you Janet!  :o)


> Can I have a pair of the earrings please?

    It's a possibility.  ;)


     ~Steve~


>

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:47:41 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>It would be *very* cool to make my own
>> jewelry
>
> All you need is a 3' x 2' bench in a 6' space, some hand tools, propane, 
>and you're away.

If it's that easy then why isn't everyone doing it :-)
I think that you forgot to mention talent and the ability to work with your
hands. Both of which you have.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:29:50 EDT, "Janet" <par### [at] attnet> wrote:

>Beautiful work Steve! Can I have a pair of the earrings please?

He does take commissions so be careful what you wish for :-)

Steve designed and made a fantastic opal ring for my wife, which she loves.

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message 
news:rvvj93h8jbsujcl6hk5gkpaeov1f5j5ufi@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:47:41 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>
>>It would be *very* cool to make my own
>>> jewelry
>>
>> All you need is a 3' x 2' bench in a 6' space, some hand tools, propane,
>>and you're away.
>
> If it's that easy then why isn't everyone doing it :-)

   Actually, I think everyone IS doing it! Too many designers out there now 
that the internet is available. It's a good challenge though. :o)


> I think that you forgot to mention talent and the ability to work with 
> your
> hands. Both of which you have.

     Heh, thanks, I try... :o)

    ~Steve~



>
> Regards
> Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:29:01 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>   Actually, I think everyone IS doing it! Too many designers out there now 
>that the internet is available. It's a good challenge though. :o)


Designers are ten a penny. 

>
>> I think that you forgot to mention talent and the ability to work with 
>> your
>> hands. Both of which you have.
>
>     Heh, thanks, I try... :o)

:-)

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:4699d59f@news.povray.org...
> Now with a brooch, or, as some of you might call it, a pin. With this 
> image I cranked it up and used +a0.0 +am2, and it took 6.5 hours! The 
> first two images took just 30 mins. each with standard AA.
>
>

What I had not seen earlier, is that you seem to have used a (subdued) 
celtic pattern as a basis, haven't you? In the brooch it shows more.
Excellent work, btw. You are a multi-talented fellow Steve.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message