 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:44d0efe4@news.povray.org...
> Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
>
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
>
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
>
My Precious!
Beautiful!
The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
BTW when will you make the saxophone?
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc" <jac### [at] wanadoo fr> wrote in message
news:44d0f2e8@news.povray.org...
>
> news:44d0efe4@news.povray.org...
>> Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
>>
> http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
>>
> http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
>>
> My Precious!
> Beautiful!
Thank you Marc.
> The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it right
in PoV ... ;)
>
> BTW when will you make the saxophone?
Heh... Oh, I wish...! :o)
(I'd love to see where they make them, and what they do to make them).
~Steve~
>
> Marc
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neato...
I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:44d10ec6@news.povray.org...
> Neato...
>
> I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
I agree
> OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
Indeed but you'd have to have a virtual finger to wear it ;-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>Neato...
>>
>>I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
>
> I agree
>
>>OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
>
> Indeed but you'd have to have a virtual finger to wear it ;-)
No problem - I'll give it to my virtual girlfriend. :-$ (It would look
silly on my anyway...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's nice, Steve. Do you find there is any interplay between the act
of modelling the decorations in mesh and modelling them in real life?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:44d634da$1@news.povray.org...
> That's nice, Steve. Do you find there is any interplay between the act of
> modelling the decorations in mesh and modelling them in real life?
Thanks Jim. Well, for me, no. I'm one of those designers that can
visualise a design, and then go ahead and make what I 'see' in my head. By
this, I mean that I very rarely draw a design, and then make it. Sad really,
as I was (hopefully!) a good line/shade artist with pencil/charcoal, etc.
when I was younger - I just don't do it now, (even for pleasure, where at
one stage, that was all I did), but since I bought one of these damn
comp's... ;) all I do now, is play with 3D. It's strange really, as I
never envisaged owning a computer - ever. Now I have one, (my first one),
that's sat beside me on the floor doing nothing, and a new monster black
tower thingy humming away in front of me. So I own two. And, you know, it's
really not 'me', but I love the challenge of a computer, and I think you
know where I'm coming from with this.
I digress. As for your original question Jim, making a 3D image just cant
compare with making the 'real thing'. There're too many physical procedures
to go through to complete a ring, (item), and then be satisfied with the
result/s compared to the 3D image.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 02/08/2006 14:58:
> "Marc" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> news:44d0f2e8@news.povray.org...
>>
>
> Thank you Marc.
>
>
>> The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
>
> But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it right
> in PoV ... ;)
First, find the best possible colour and apply it as fade_color to the interior,
not the surface.
Then...
Try changing fade_distance to a smaller value until it's OK. Also, having the
right ior and dispersion helps.
>
>
>
>> Marc
>>
>>
>
>
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe that ex-lovers are
really dying for you to telephone them at four in the morning.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:44d7d6e4$1@news.povray.org...
]
>> But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it
>> right in PoV ... ;)
> First, find the best possible colour and apply it as fade_color to the
> interior, not the surface.
> Then...
> Try changing fade_distance to a smaller value until it's OK. Also, having
> the right ior and dispersion helps.
Thanks Alain, I'll give that a try now that I'm near finishing my IRTC
image.
~Steve~
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
> WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe that ex-lovers
> are really dying for you to telephone them at four in the morning.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
