|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:44d634da$1@news.povray.org...
> That's nice, Steve. Do you find there is any interplay between the act of
> modelling the decorations in mesh and modelling them in real life?
Thanks Jim. Well, for me, no. I'm one of those designers that can
visualise a design, and then go ahead and make what I 'see' in my head. By
this, I mean that I very rarely draw a design, and then make it. Sad really,
as I was (hopefully!) a good line/shade artist with pencil/charcoal, etc.
when I was younger - I just don't do it now, (even for pleasure, where at
one stage, that was all I did), but since I bought one of these damn
comp's... ;) all I do now, is play with 3D. It's strange really, as I
never envisaged owning a computer - ever. Now I have one, (my first one),
that's sat beside me on the floor doing nothing, and a new monster black
tower thingy humming away in front of me. So I own two. And, you know, it's
really not 'me', but I love the challenge of a computer, and I think you
know where I'm coming from with this.
I digress. As for your original question Jim, making a 3D image just cant
compare with making the 'real thing'. There're too many physical procedures
to go through to complete a ring, (item), and then be satisfied with the
result/s compared to the 3D image.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|