"Ross" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message 
news:438f2026$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> The light may be too yellow.  I experimented with my digital camera and
> took
>
> I agree with the yellowness. A little too much for my taste. It looks like 
> a
> fun scene to tweak lighting on for hours and hours :)
>
> have you thought about a night-time variation? i know it wouldn't get the
> points across that you wanted to make, but it might look neat anyway.
>


Attached is a photograph I came across last year when researching a proper 
lighting for "The Three Blind Mice Return" (my POVComp entry).  It was 
largely the inspiration for this type of a scene.  (Also note the vertical 
framing.)

-- 
Jeremy M. Praay
www.beantoad.com

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'MALMANTILE.JPG' (62 KB)

Preview of image 'MALMANTILE.JPG'

"Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecom> wrote in message
news:438f3873@news.povray.org...
> "Ross" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message
> news:438f2026$1@news.povray.org...
> >>
> >> The light may be too yellow.  I experimented with my digital camera and
> > took
> >
> > I agree with the yellowness. A little too much for my taste. It looks
like
> > a
> > fun scene to tweak lighting on for hours and hours :)
> >
> > have you thought about a night-time variation? i know it wouldn't get
the
> > points across that you wanted to make, but it might look neat anyway.
> >
>
>
> Attached is a photograph I came across last year when researching a proper
> lighting for "The Three Blind Mice Return" (my POVComp entry).  It was
> largely the inspiration for this type of a scene.  (Also note the vertical
> framing.)
>

In the photo the wall itself looks yellow, with not as much yellow light.
Your wall looks white-ish with lots of yellow light. Or maybe the photo just
has a better radiosity setting that allows the wall to spread the color
better ;)

Post a reply to this message

"Ross" <rli### [at] everestkcnet> wrote in message 
news:438f43cf$1@news.povray.org...
>
> In the photo the wall itself looks yellow, with not as much yellow light.
> Your wall looks white-ish with lots of yellow light.

Hmmm... I fear that you are correct.  I kind of enjoy the yellowish, though. 
Maybe simply because I've gotten so used to it.  I used Jaime's light 
macros, so blame him.  ;-)  But seriously, it's pretty easy to adjust the 
temperature of "the sun" (Honestly, I don't fully understand what I'm doing 
with those macros).  In this case, I made it pretty low.

> Or maybe the photo just
> has a better radiosity setting that allows the wall to spread the color
> better ;)

He probably used God's "Let there be light" macro's, which I'm told, render 
very quickly.  ;-)

Post a reply to this message

"Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> wrote in message 
news:438f187d$1@news.povray.org...
> "dlm" <me### [at] addressinvalid> wrote in message 
> news:438e6faf$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> The composition is quite pleasing to my eye.
>> My only issues of concern were:
>>  the way-too-yellowness of the early morning light
>>  the absence of a skirting board
>>  the height of the dado rail on the wall (higher than ladder-back top 
>> makes it useless/unutilitarian)
>> To quote the Shakers - form follows function
>>
>
> Thank you for your response!
>
> The light may be too yellow.  I experimented with my digital camera and 
> took several photos that I used for comparison.  But in this case, I was 
> looking for a very yellow (almost orange) light.
Perhaps hellfire's aburning outside?


> The peg-board (if I had created one) would be much higher up, yes.  Dado 
> rails at this height were very common in the 1800's.  I'll have to check 
> some of my Shaker reference photo's, since I don't recall exacly why I did 
> it that way.  Maybe I had no particular reason.  I think the image needs 
> "something" in that space, however.

It certainly balances the composition.
And granted there are dado rails set at almost any old height in even in the 
same 19th century NY country home.
e.g. http://www.maplegroveny.org/resources/03History.pdf


But would Shakers have built a rail with such a large cross-section? And 
placed it at mantel height fit for an Irish pub - imagine a line of empty 
beer glasses perched on that... Perhaps I was thinking of the utility of a 
chair rail - to protect both wall and furniture, and 3 or 4 inches high.
There are some rather more spartan interiors to view at e.g. 
http://shakermuseumandlibrary.org/ourhistory.htm

If you do stretch your format vertically perhaps the more shaker-typical peg 
board would make sense.

DLM

Post a reply to this message

Quick portrait-style render.  I think I like this better.  But perhaps I 
shouldn't have cut-off the bottom of the table leg.

Also, I think I need to spend some time working on the floor now.  Their 
floors were not nearly so shiny and polished, and generally had larger, 
lighter colored boards.

Comments?

-- 
Jeremy M. Praay
www.beantoad.com

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'Shaker11.jpg' (46 KB)

Preview of image 'Shaker11.jpg'

"Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecom> schreef in bericht
news:438fcc47@news.povray.org...
> Quick portrait-style render.  I think I like this better.  But perhaps I
> shouldn't have cut-off the bottom of the table leg.
>
> Also, I think I need to spend some time working on the floor now.  Their
> floors were not nearly so shiny and polished, and generally had larger,
> lighter colored boards.
>
> Comments?
>
Yes, I like this better too. Now you might experiment with the crucifixion
shadow on a higher level, against the wall... But maybe that would become to
explicite.
There is an interesting  *conflict*  as it were, between the horizontal
shelf(?) and the projection of the window. As if spirituality was breaking
through down to earth materialism...
The shelf thing, is that where Shakers hung their furniture in order to
clean the floor? I have seen photographs were that was higher up the wall...

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote in message 
news:43904369@news.povray.org...
>
> Yes, I like this better too. Now you might experiment with the crucifixion
> shadow on a higher level, against the wall... But maybe that would become 
> to
> explicite.

Hmmmm... Interesting thought, but I'll probably keep it where it is in this 
image.  What I really didn't want to do was "beat you over the head" with 
the cross/crucifix.  In fact, if the majority of viewers never noticed it, 
that would be fine.  I often like putting things in my scenes so that if 
someone stares at it for 5 minutes, they may eventually exclaim, "Hey!  Did 
you see this?"

I _may_ create other versions, or other Shaker scenes.  I suppose it largely 
depends on how long my interest holds, among other things.  I've also 
thought it would be neat to produce (I don't know what it's called) a series 
of 3 pictures: the large central image, with the two smaller (tall) pictures 
on the side.  But I do not see this scene working well that way.  It would 
likely be a new scene.

> There is an interesting  *conflict*  as it were, between the horizontal
> shelf(?) and the projection of the window. As if spirituality was breaking
> through down to earth materialism...
> The shelf thing, is that where Shakers hung their furniture in order to
> clean the floor? I have seen photographs were that was higher up the 
> wall...
>

Last night, I looked over my Shaker books again.  Most rooms had the 
peg-board at about 6 feet up the wall, and some rooms also had the lower 
"dado rail" (it's a new term for me), which apparently is there to prevent 
the back of the chairs (or other furniture) from banging against the wall. 
As such, mine appears to be a little too high to be realistic.

I experimented with changing the height of the rail last night.  Also, the 
highest point of the wall that is visible is only around 5 feet high, so the 
pegboard could not be seen (if it existed).

Thank you for all of your input.  I really appreciate it.  I'm learning. 
:-)

Post a reply to this message

Ya know ...

I keep coming back and looking at this image.  I really like it allot.
I think it has a very warm, soothing feeling about it.  I'd like to
sit there and soak up the warm sunlight.  Very nice.


Kyle

Post a reply to this message

"Kyle" <hob### [at] gatenet> wrote in message 
news:2um1p1tlbmke5ghon9548ni775e27pkaqb@4ax.com...
> Ya know ...
>
> I keep coming back and looking at this image.  I really like it allot.
> I think it has a very warm, soothing feeling about it.  I'd like to
> sit there and soak up the warm sunlight.  Very nice.
>

Thank you.  :-)

I should have an updated version out later this week.  I'm tweaking again...

Post a reply to this message