|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John D. Gwinner" <joh### [at] cornelledu> schreef in bericht
news:420ec208$1@news.povray.org...
>
> With all that work on the ship it's a shame we can't see it, but the
framing
> suits this photo perfectly.
>
This is a picture of the ship under construction (in 2000) in a fairly
advanced stage.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> schreef in bericht
news:420f15fb$1@news.povray.org...
>
> news:420e0642@news.povray.org...
> > Hi all,
> >
> Hey! that's great!
Thanks a lot Marc!
> I don't know exactly why but your image has a painting or quality comics
> look. ( the faded colors maybe?)
I tend to end up mostly with rather faded colors. Must be an unconscious
preference :-)
but yes, I agree that it gives that impression.
> I'm very proud to see my sea can take part to your work :-)
Well! Only natural, as your sea is the best (IMHO) I have yet found.
> The only advice I can give is may be the foam is still not quite
convincing.
> Is it really necessary under this carribean blue sky?
Well, consider this to be the day following the storm. I have experienced a
few times things like this: clear skies and still rough seas.
There is still a problem with the foam. John Gwinner rightly stressed this
too. I have not found yet a way to make the foam stick preferentially to the
wave tops, although I use exactly the same function for the sea as for the
foam. Hmmm... work to do ;-)
>
> Tot ziens
Insgelijks!
>
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Remy Closset" <rem### [at] tiscalifr> wrote:
> No, I'm joking, it's a great image. Only something: a tempest with such a
> blue sky...
Happens often here in the Caribbean. There could be a storm 1000 km to the
north, and we would get the rough waves, but not the stormy weather.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote in message
news:420f17e4@news.povray.org...
> This is a picture of the ship under construction (in 2000) in a fairly
> advanced stage.
Nice - the prow looks a bit 'big' to me but I'm going to guess it's
accurate.
I understand what you mean about splines - I need to work with them a bit
more too, lots to learn there.
I vaugely remember foam all over the place when I was on a Navy ship long
ago, I just remembered it being on top too. Makes me want to go look at
some google images of the sea <G>.
If I remember right, the foam 'starts' on the wave crest, then the wave
moves and the foam doesn't, sorta. Then again, that was a while ago. I
should probably move these comments to the other thread.
== John ==
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:4216aa86$1@news.povray.org...
>
> If I remember right, the foam 'starts' on the wave crest, then the wave
> moves and the foam doesn't, sorta. Then again, that was a while ago. I
> should probably move these comments to the other thread.
>
> == John ==
You remember right :)
It is just tricky to simulate it... maybe a slightly translated version of
the function generating the waves?
But while foam forms at wave crest, it vanishes at the back of the wave as
the bubbles make their way to the surface.
I have to say I choosed crackle pattern to make a sea breaking on the shore
with swirls and upwells and not for open sea.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> schreef in bericht
news:4216ff32@news.povray.org...
>
> news:4216aa86$1@news.povray.org...
> >
> > If I remember right, the foam 'starts' on the wave crest, then the wave
> > moves and the foam doesn't, sorta. Then again, that was a while ago. I
> > should probably move these comments to the other thread.
> >
> > == John ==
> You remember right :)
> It is just tricky to simulate it... maybe a slightly translated version of
> the function generating the waves?
> But while foam forms at wave crest, it vanishes at the back of the wave as
> the bubbles make their way to the surface.
> I have to say I choosed crackle pattern to make a sea breaking on the
shore
> with swirls and upwells and not for open sea.
>
> Marc
>
Yes, that is something to look into. I shall do that once I have some
time.... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John D. Gwinner" <joh### [at] cornelledu> schreef in bericht
news:4216aa86$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Nice - the prow looks a bit 'big' to me but I'm going to guess it's
> accurate.
Yes, it is accurate. You have to remember that those ships were built for
transporting as much goods as possible.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |