"=Bob=" <robertUNDERSCOREdobbinsATmailDOTtdsDOTnet> schreef in bericht
news:41aa1930@news.povray.org...
> "Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote in message
news:41aa187b$1@news.povray.org...
>
> : > I tried this under Pov 3.6.1 and 3.5 and there's little or no
> : > difference (win98).
> :
> : strange...  I'll try it later today on my WinXP-computer, now first I'm
> : going to check if I really used identical settings.
>
> The difference might be 3.6.1 vs. 3.6

hmm, I have 3.6.1 apparently

I checked my settings, they were identical and did give those different
results, but when I removed +ua from my settings, 3.5 and 3.6 gave the same
result.

weirdness! :)

cu!
-- 
ZK AKA Gaeriel
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"I plan to live forever! ... or die trying..."

Post a reply to this message

"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote in message
news:41aa19f9$1@news.povray.org...

: hmm, I have 3.6.1 apparently
:
: I checked my settings, they were identical and did give those different
: results, but when I removed +ua from my settings, 3.5 and 3.6 gave the same
: result.
: weirdness! :)

I get the same result using that setting. You should
be sure to identify your settings and the full version
next time. I know I always miss something too, so
don't take that suggestion harshly. Just trying to
help. Have a great day!
=Bob=

Post a reply to this message

"=Bob=" <robertUNDERSCOREdobbinsATmailDOTtdsDOTnet> schreef in bericht
news:41aa1b73$1@news.povray.org...
> "Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> wrote in message
news:41aa19f9$1@news.povray.org...
>
> : hmm, I have 3.6.1 apparently
> :
> : I checked my settings, they were identical and did give those different
> : results, but when I removed +ua from my settings, 3.5 and 3.6 gave the
same
> : result.
> : weirdness! :)
>
> I get the same result using that setting.

ok, anybody else?  A non-windows user if possible? :)

> You should
> be sure to identify your settings and the full version
> next time. I know I always miss something too, so
> don't take that suggestion harshly.

Don't worry, I don't :)  I just thought, since I used exactly the same
settings, it doesn't matter what the settings are.  Guess I was wrong :-/
sorry for that

Anyway, the settings I used, apart from the default settings: +fn +ua +sp8
+ep4, using POV-Ray for windows v3.5 and V3.6.1

> Just trying to
> help. Have a great day!

you helped!

cu!
-- 
ZK AKA Gaeriel
http://www.povplace.be.tf
"Ah ha... The worst movie you ever saw? Well, my next one will be even
better! Hello?..."

Post a reply to this message

> ok, anybody else?  A non-windows user if possible? :)

I get pretty identical images for 3.5, 3.6 and 3.6.1 when using the 
default settings.

Using +UA, however, I get the effect you describe, i.e. the highlight in 
3.6 and 3.6.1 looks different.

System: Gentoo Linux 2.4.25, Official POV compiles


HTH,
Florian
-- 
camera{look_at-y*10location<8,-3,-8>*10}#local a=0;#while(a<999)sphere{
#local _=.01*a-4.99;#local p=a*.01-5;#local c=.01*a-4.995;<sin(p*pi)*5p
*10pow(p,5)*.01>sin(c*c*c*.1)+1pigment{rgb 3}}#local a=a+1;#end
/******** http://www.torfbold.com ******** http://www.imp.org ********/

Post a reply to this message

zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe news:41aa181b$1@news.povray.org

> It's not just what you did to me, but your general behaviour against
> other people, including me. It's your tone that's very unfriendly. 
> Your use of 
> 

Not just ;)  But anyway Thorsten's remarks are very helpfull usualy AFAIK.

-- 
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics

Post a reply to this message

"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256com> wrote in message
news:Xns95B070C67426Araf256com@203.29.75.35...
> zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe news:41aa181b$1@news.povray.org
>
> > It's not just what you did to me, but your general behaviour against
> > other people, including me. It's your tone that's very unfriendly.
> > Your use of
> >
>
> Not just ;)  But anyway Thorsten's remarks are very helpfull usualy AFAIK.

Oh, yes, most of the time he is helpful, but, well, not always very friendly :-/

Anyway, Thorsten, if I insulted you, I'm sorry, I was a little on the edge :-/

cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x)               // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf

Post a reply to this message