 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> Meant for print, but still very PiBIsh in my opinion.
>
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
> with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
> get the shading and level of complexity just right. Steven Pigeon's
> 'Radiosity Experiment' post re-kindled my interest in this subject.
> Thank you, Steven.
>
> Black border added in paint to show how this will sit high (although not
> so tight) in the (white) frame.
>
> -Shay
Wow; cool!
I'm trying to imagine what it would look like if you made the windows
reflective, added a little specular to them, and added sky_sphere {
pigment { wrinkles } } to the scene. :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
v. Nice
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] nospam net> wrote in message
news:4086cc3c$1@news.povray.org...
|
| Excellent work. It immediately captures the feel, makes you say,
| "Hmm. What new office building is. . . . wait a minute!" And
| your eye is drawn down to the improbabilities (architecturally
| speaking) and back up to examine more details. I really like
| this one!
Awesome! That's exactly what I wanted to get across. Thank you.
|
| Care to share a few details about the texture/settings?
Sure, but you'll likely be disappointed. The textures, as in all of my
recent pictures, are just pigments with either ambient 0 or 1. The
ambient 0 pigments in this picture are shaded with shadowless, parallel
lights. An additional, dim, shadowless but not parallel light "punches
out" the picture just a bit from the screen.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:40871abe$1@news.povray.org...
|
| I'm trying to imagine what it would look like if you made the
| windows reflective, added a little specular to them, and added
| sky_sphere { pigment { wrinkles } } to the scene. :-)
Gave it a shot just now. After a few lines, I had do conclude that I
just don't have the patience to find out.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dont you just want to shuv a light into the middle! :-) I keep getting
these urges.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <sah### [at] simcopartscom> wrote in message
news:4086c2e4@news.povray.org...
To me, that's looking forward in 'living style' Shay. Nice design,
'nice' image.
~Steve~
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi, Shay,
> An abstraction of a specific style of architectural drawing. I've messed
> with this off and on for a while, but have not until now been able to
> get the shading and level of complexity just right.
I like this image! The clean, bare look is appealing to me. I do
architectural renderings, too. Sometimes the test renders at q5 aa 0.6 in
quick_color look better than the fully textured versions. I'm going to post
some here over the weekend. Check 'em out!
Your picture is great the way it is...don't fool around with it any further.
--
Michael Brendan Hurley
http://www.geocities.com/mbrendanh/indxx02.html
mbh### [at] sabernet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Shay wrote:
> "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
> news:40871abe$1@news.povray.org...
> |
> | I'm trying to imagine what it would look like if you made the
> | windows reflective, added a little specular to them, and added
> | sky_sphere { pigment { wrinkles } } to the scene. :-)
>
> Gave it a shot just now. After a few lines, I had do conclude that I
> just don't have the patience to find out.
>
> -Shay
LOL -- you're sure not alone! Because computers have gotten so fast,
we've gotten used to rendering scenes quickly. Once we "punch-it" to the
next level, it's like the old days, all over again :-)
I used to render scenes on a Macintosh Quadra 9500 back in the day and
would time it so I could go out to lunch and come back and see something
-- and this was just regular raytracing!
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Brendan Hurley" <mbh### [at] sabernet> wrote in message
news:408842d3@news.povray.org...
|
| I'm going to post some (architectural renderings) here over
| the weekend. Check 'em out!
Thanks, I'll look for them.
| Your picture is great the way it is...don't fool around with
| it any further.
Nope, this is the final version. I'm going to render it for print this
weekend with rediculous AA settings in an attempt to save as much of the
black outlines as possible, but the code isn't going to change.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow: not only does it look cool, but it is a new idea.
Excellent!
--
to all the companies who wait until a large user base becomes
dependant on their freeware, then shafting said happy campers with
mandatory payment for continued usage. I spit on your grave.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
